"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote in news:Hqa2h.26798
$gO3.10286@newsfe7-win.ntli.net:

http://www.enterprisemission.com/datashead.htm

You can see whatever you like to see, in a pile of rocks,
amongst shadows, with blurry photographs.

I wouldn't be confident about anything sighted on an Apollo mission.
In that there is a lot of questions remaining unanswered as to whether
NASA faked their moon landings?
The Lunar Rover, like the LEM is a remarkable piece of hardware, too
unbelievable to believe it functioned so well?
The same with the Hasselblad cameras that were used. According to
"What Happened on the Moon" - these cameras were still standard, just
with oversized controls. They were not sealed nor shielded from the
radiation and extreme temperatures on the moon, nor that they were to
be used in a vacuum. How did the film ever manage to function in that
alien environment?
Oh, if you watch "The Secret NASA Transmissions" - it is normal for
astronauts not to mention anything strange before them - they won't
describe or even notice anything strange in their immediate environment,
even if it shows up so obviously on video footage.
They literally have to bump into it, or fall over it - before they
will acknowledge it. (Shows the difference between Apollo and the
Shuttle missions - NASA becomes dumb and dumber)

Harvey