"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:nWL3h.5734$yz3.4163@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net: 

In news:i_G3h.9472$rn6.4283@newsfe1-win.ntli.net,
Amanda Angelika <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> typed:

I suppose it could be the wreckage of a Russian space craft, if those
are however human remains they would have to have been fairly recent,
there was to my knowledge no failed Russian manned moon landing, but
who knows perhaps it was carried out in secret and was never reported
because it failed, but if it isn't of earthly origin then it must be
ET. --
Amanda

Actually I have done a bit more checking on this and now think it is
possible that's not an android at all but is none other than Yuri
Gagarin himself

Gagarin apparently died on the 27th March 1968 in a MiG-15UTI on a
routine training flight near Kirzhachat. However what if that was a
cover story and in reality he had been sent to the Moon?

At the time the race was on to put a man on the Moon. The Russians had
been working to put a man on the moon since 1959 see:
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/R/Russian_manned_Moon.html

They would have most likely chosen Gagarin for such a mission because
he had been the first man in Space and was the Russian's best known
cosmonaut, so why not the first man on the Moon?

It is highly likely IMO they would have kept such a mission secret and
would have only announced it if it had been a success. It was never
announced because it failed and Gagarin was killed.

It is interesting to note there seem to be objects in this photograph
http://www.enterprisemission.com/images/data/5.jpg that seem to have
red paint on them Consistent with Soviet markings. Secondly there are
parts there that could be consistent with a Soviet Zond Lander module
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/Z/Zond.html although heavily
wrecked and melted there are clear metal brackets on the piece of
wreckage in the foreground and other very mechanical looking parts

The other striking thing about it is although the skull looks more
like android than a human skull. It is highly likely that the space
helmet or other head gear would have melted in the searing heat of the
crash leaving parts of it melted and fused onto the skull.
http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/Images/StarChild/space_level2/gagarin_bi
g.gif Although there does appear to be a small fragment of the helmet
laying quite near to the skull. IMO there is also a passing
resemblance in the physiognomy of the skull with Gargarin himself.

Of course I don't know if any of this is true, but if so it proves
NASA went to the Moon but  shows the US were probably not the first.
In a strange sort of Ironic way, it was perhaps fitting that the last
men on the moon paid tribute to the first.

Note - it is nice to be a healthy skeptic.

Because everyone does lie to us.
Politicians do (left, right and centre) - religious people do.
The only way to know anything (whether it is truthful) is to see the
supporting evidence - then there is no doubt about it.

Harvey