| Subject: Re: Bush failed to take out Osama bin Laden when he had the chance |
| From: "Gandalf Grey" <gandalfgrey@infectedmail.com> |
| Date: 23/12/2006, 03:49 |
| Newsgroups: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.philosophy,alt.politics,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.slack,alt.society.liberalism |
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message
news:co7po25aiklbvh7gfrtr3vfgh3vtmo03n6@4ax.com...
"Stevie Nichts" <nix2nichts@yahoo.com> wrote:
gjohns01@eudoramail.com wrote:
But here's betting the same right wing accusers don't line up to talk
about this one.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/france_binladen_dc
A documentary says French special forces had Osama bin Laden in their
sights twice about three years ago but their U.S. superiors never
ordered them to fire...
---
A documentary says French special forces had Osama bin Laden in
their sights twice about three years ago but their U.S. superiors
never ordered them to fire.
The French military, however, said that the incidents never
happened and the report was "erroneous information."
---
The frenchies would have tried to surrender to bin Laden.
Which would actually be more than Osama bin Bush did....NOTHING.