Subject: Re: Bush failed to take out Osama bin Laden when he had the chance
From: "Rev. 11D Meow!" <doik@plugh.corn>
Date: 23/12/2006, 04:06
Newsgroups: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.philosophy,alt.politics,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.slack,alt.society.liberalism

uh?

since when did
revealing reality
ever do much
a bunch
about freein'
this week's
geek munch
quota,
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


Dove Nipples




"Gandalf Grey" <gandalfgrey@infectedmail.com> wrote in message 
news:UG1jh.2842$w91.2625@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...

"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message 
news:co7po25aiklbvh7gfrtr3vfgh3vtmo03n6@4ax.com...
"Stevie Nichts" <nix2nichts@yahoo.com> wrote:

gjohns01@eudoramail.com wrote:

But here's betting the same right wing accusers don't line 
up to talk
about this one.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/france_binladen_dc

A documentary says French special forces had Osama bin 
Laden in their
sights twice about three years ago but their U.S. superiors 
never
ordered them to fire...

---
A documentary says French special forces had Osama bin Laden 
in
their sights twice about three years ago but their U.S. 
superiors
never ordered them to fire.

The French military, however, said that the incidents never
happened and the report was "erroneous information."
---

The frenchies would have tried to surrender to bin Laden.

Which would actually be more than Osama bin Bush 
did....NOTHING.