| Subject: Re: Bush failed to take out Osama bin Laden when he had the chance |
| From: "Rev. 11D Meow!" <doik@plugh.corn> |
| Date: 23/12/2006, 04:06 |
| Newsgroups: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.philosophy,alt.politics,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.slack,alt.society.liberalism |
uh?
since when did
revealing reality
ever do much
a bunch
about freein'
this week's
geek munch
quota,
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Dove Nipples
"Gandalf Grey" <gandalfgrey@infectedmail.com> wrote in message
news:UG1jh.2842$w91.2625@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in message
news:co7po25aiklbvh7gfrtr3vfgh3vtmo03n6@4ax.com...
"Stevie Nichts" <nix2nichts@yahoo.com> wrote:
gjohns01@eudoramail.com wrote:
But here's betting the same right wing accusers don't line
up to talk
about this one.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/france_binladen_dc
A documentary says French special forces had Osama bin
Laden in their
sights twice about three years ago but their U.S. superiors
never
ordered them to fire...
---
A documentary says French special forces had Osama bin Laden
in
their sights twice about three years ago but their U.S.
superiors
never ordered them to fire.
The French military, however, said that the incidents never
happened and the report was "erroneous information."
---
The frenchies would have tried to surrender to bin Laden.
Which would actually be more than Osama bin Bush
did....NOTHING.