On 31 Mar 2007 23:51:07 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA"
<science@zzz.com>:

HAGAR, Okay, one more time.  I am qualified to see and understand the
proof regarding ET visitors, and you simply ARE not.

Well, Hagar *does* seem to be rational, so I guess you're
correct.

HANL

<snip>
-- 

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
                          - McNameless