On 7 Apr 2007 06:29:55 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA"
<science@zzz.com>:

<snip unsupported assertions>

Strange; there doesn't seem to be anything left...

Bob Casanova wrote:

On 6 Apr 2007 02:09:06 -0700, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA"
<science@zzz.com>:

...leave us real researchers alone.

You wouldn't know real research if it bit you in the ass.
Here's a hint: *Real* research involves examining data, not
asserting preconceived notions and twisting or ignoring
inconvenient facts.

HTH. HANL.

No, on second thought, continue the sort of life you already
have: insecure, irritating and bombastic. And keep your
persecution complex and delusions of adequacy; they're *so*
cute in a supposed adult.

Toodle-ooo...

The above is worth reiterating.
-- 

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
                          - McNameless