Subject: Re: Question for UFO skeptics
From: Sir Gilligan Horry
Date: 11/04/2007, 02:57
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo


New Best UFO Videos Free Downloads Online !!!
=========================================

HERE ......... (and join up as a friend) ........


http://360.yahoo.com/profile-FJjJtIo8erTHyfy5T0fQ



ALSO COPIES HERE .........

http://groups.google.com/group/aliens-ufos-proof-evidence-research-facts/files



PASS THEM ON PLEASE !!!  :)



=========================================

http://360.yahoo.com/profile-FJjJtIo8erTHyfy5T0fQ

http://groups.google.com/group/aliens-ufos-proof-evidence-research-facts/files

http://ufovideo.blogspot.com

http://free-ufo-videos.blogspot.com

http://groups.myspace.com/AliensUFOsBestVideosFree

http://www.disclosureproject.org

http://www.geocities.com/extraterrestrial_ufos/

http://ufos.conforums.com

http://www.eboards4all.com/167995/

http://download-ufo-files.atspace.com

http://alienufophoto.top-site-list.com

http://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org

http://com2.runboard.com/bufos35

http://www.ufovideocoordinator.com

http://www.cseti.org/crashes/016.htm


















=========================================















=========================================




On 9 Apr 2007 21:42:55 -0700, "mike3" <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hi.

I have a question for any UFO skeptics that may be here. What is the
rationale for considering UFOs an "extraordinary claim" for which the
probability of being true is so nearly zero that it's best not to do
any serious and deep scientific investigations, anyway? Is it because
the supposed lack of evidence? If so, then why believe in, say, string
theory, which by the way has absolutely NO evidence (or at best, very
little) to directly prove that it actually is true, unlike general
relativity and quantum mechanics (which it purports to unify)? Why is
that considered a more "likely" or "reasonable" avenue of inquiry as
opposed to UFOs despite the fact that there is very little if any
direct evidence to substantiate it?