On 12 May 2007 23:02:33 -0700, mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 12, 10:34 pm, Sir Gilligan Horry <G...@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:
...

Yes, Stephen has the same ideas as me, about desalinization plants for
clean water for everyone. But I'm more cautious about giving 7 billion
people all clean water, free energy, etc .... because I know how
volatile people are.
Most people just can't be good.
They often get silly ideas.

So you'd rather have 7 billion people run out of food and water

I didn't say that.
You are putting words in my mouth.

I watch all the documentaries on TV.
Recently DWTV was talking about Spain and their water shortage.
And the corruption there.
i.e.
People just living and cheating for today
with no care about the future.


And look at Africa.
Even with all their AIDs, and starvation, and wars, and malaria, and
everything, they are over populated.

You'd think with all those people they would have enough labor force
to build huge universities for education and care of their country.

The only way you can give them all clean water to bathe and drink all
day is with cold fusion or other free energy devices.

Then what ?
1 billion people in Africa with no care or love or honesty or
goodness?
And getting angry and having a riot sometimes.

Look what Argentina did recently with their water and freedom and
limited education......
they went and genetically modified most all of their soya beans to
feed the masses and make some dollars, but the soya beans have turned
into a rampant uncontrollable disaster. (you read up about it)

I could sit here giving you hundreds of other examples.

The only way to fix those and similar problems is to have a new type
of united nations with full access and regular updates on major media
stations to the world.
With websites where the general public can contribute data.

Instead we have FOX News and BBC talking about Iraq everyday.

and
starve to death when the oil runs out (see www.dieoff.org for more
information)? Which is worse? At least if we give out the technology
we have a CHOICE as to whether or not we nuke ourselves with it.

You are talking loose.

You are too trusting.

And too "oh give it a go, 50 / 50".


If I was the boss at Area51 for example and I had free energy.
I would secure it first, and not give it to the Una Bomber for
example.
Then I would study all the groups on Earth by using Echelon and
Mother.

Then at the correct time, I would have a huge free energy device in
Area51 feeding electricity to the world after sharing several
documentaries at the cinemas to everyone first.

I would tell people about it carefully in the documentaries.

Then say, the people of the world can keep warm, or keep cool.
And all people can get it cheaply, so that you don't have to do
terrible things to others to get a few dollars to pay for your energy
bills and gasoline.

And at the same time talk very seriously about over population
and ecology.

Talk to the people and bring out their intelligence.

Anyway, that is not all of it.

It's a huge job.

But fun !!

Wars are ALL fought by choice. Whereas if we keep going with this
unsustainable crap we'll CERTAINY deep six ourselves. Maybe not
extinction, but we'll definitely hit a big wall.

Most all the general public I know are in 'La La Land'.

They just don't care.

Or they are too worried to think.

People _can_ be good, it's whether or not they _want_ to be good
that counts.

Now you are talking my language.

Anyway, we are all doing our bit.

I enjoy every single day thanks to this internet.

Keep in touch.