On May 13, 9:25 pm, S...@pfffit.spam (Bruce Hutchinson) wrote:

Furiously scratching in the sand, mike3 <mike4...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 13, 1:14 am, Cyber Trekker <cybertrek...@array.net> wrote:

mike3 wrote:

On May 13, 12:19 am, PsychoticStereo <PsychoticSte...@yahoob.com>
wrote:

mike3 <mike4...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1179030274.285216.116790
@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:

""THE DISC IS HEXAGONAL IN SHAPE AND WAS SUSPENDED FROM A BALLON [sic]
BY CABLE, WHICH BALLON [sic] WAS APPROXIMATELY TWENTY FEET IN
DIAMETER. MAJOR CURTAN FURTHER ADVISED THAT THE OBJECT FOUND RESEMBLES
A HIGH ALTITUDE WEATHER BALLOON WITH A RADAR REFLECTOR, BUT THAT
TELEPHONIC CONVERSATION BETWEEN THEIR OFFICE AND WRIGHT FIELD HAD NOT
[unintelligible] BORNE OUT THIS BELIEF."" -- FBI Telex, 1947

Could Roswell just have been a balloon crash?

Nothing is impossible, only improbable.

Well, yes, but how would a non-balloon crash jive with this telex?

Simply this, it very much depends on whether the truth is being told in the
telex.

But the telex was sent on the 8th, not the 9th when the story was
supposedly changed to be a balloon. What exactly is going on here?

Ramey's explanation was issued late in the afternoon of the 8th-  too
late for most newspapers except for some evening editions on the west
coast.

So then maybe that was part of the change of story to the
balloon one, but once again then we are not left with any
sort of real proof that it was just a balloon. The problem is,
why hasn't the government disclosed the _real_ balloon
debris, etc. if that's what happened there? They crated
it all off, so they should have it. And why all the incredible
secrecy, anyway, if the balloon and instrumentation were
made from purely ordinary materials and technology?

hutch

If you add up all known religions and cancel the contradictions,
you are left with only one invariant universal message:
God needs *your* money.
  ----Uncle Al (Usenet)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -