<mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 13, 9:25 pm, S...@pfffit.spam (Bruce Hutchinson) wrote:

mike3 <mike4...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Ramey's explanation was issued late in the afternoon of the 8th-  too
late for most newspapers except for some evening editions on the west
coast.

So then maybe that was part of the change of story to the
balloon one, but once again then we are not left with any
sort of real proof that it was just a balloon. The problem is,
why hasn't the government disclosed the _real_ balloon
debris, etc. if that's what happened there? 

Why on earth would "they" have kept a torn and shredded radar
reflector and the blackened, crumbling pieces of a neoprine balloon?  

They crated
it all off, 

Says who...?  to where?

so they should have it. And why all the incredible
secrecy, anyway, if the balloon and instrumentation were
made from purely ordinary materials and technology?

What "incredible secrecy"?  Please cite.


hutch

If you add up all known religions and cancel the contradictions,
you are left with only one invariant universal message: 
God needs *your* money.
  ----Uncle Al (Usenet)