On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:50:53 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:31:58 -0700, OMG <> wrote:

I feel soooooo sorry for you the " sky is falling 
types ". 

The test of any intelligent species is its ability to provide for its long
term survival.

You lose, dumbass. 

You've got about a third of the life-supporting atmosphere you had 100 years
go. Your atmosphere will only hold out for about 50 more years, after that,
please do choke to death sucking in carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. Okee
dokee?

I am certain that answers your question.

Here ya go:

http://www.truehealth.org/oxydecl.html

The Decline of Atmospheric free Oxygen

Since we have begun to measure in 1989, there has been a steady decline of
free oxygen in our atmosphere. And while this is nothing more than expected,
since every molecule of additional carbon dioxide locks up two oxygen atoms,
the free oxygen decline is greater than the carbon dioxide lock-up.  

The greater than expected overall free oxygen decline is proof that the
Earth's photosynthetic capacity has declined. And since there has been no
measurable decline in plankton, and consequently, in marine photosynthesis,
as long expected and measured due to the increase of hard UVB radiation at
surface level, the decline points straight at the only other source of free
oxygen - the forests and green cover of the continents.

This is entirely as I had fully expected and predicted (see ON THE RECORD in
the climate section) - based upon the law of Progressive Complexity.
However, in 1985 there were no indications whatsoever of any decline in the
free oxygen content of our atmosphere, and my initial predictions were
dismissed out of hand. Here then are three graphs from "Seasonal and
interannual variations in atmospheric oxygen and implications for the global
carbon cycle", by Ralph F Keeling & Stephen R. Shertz, at the National
Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, as published in
"Nature", Aug. 27. 1992.

  
 Taken at La Jolla, California, the upper curve shows the decline in
atmospheric oxygen, and the lower curve shows the increase in atmospheric
carbon dioxide over the period from January 1989 to January 1992. The axes
are scaled (5 per meg=1p.p.m. so that the two factors are directly
comparable (mol O2 to mol CO2). Most significantly, the observed annual (as
opposed to seasonal) decline in atmospheric oxygen at La Jolla is about
double the rate as would be expected from carbon dioxide lock-up alone. 

  
Taken at Cape Grim in the Southern hemisphere, the overall atmospheric free
oxygen decline is an astonishing 95 times greater than expected from the
increase in carbon dioxide (~96 per meg versus ~ 1 p.p.m). This is also as
fully expected since most of the continental landmass by far - and the free
oxygen regeneration capacity of their forests - lies in the northern
hemisphere. The free oxygen decline in the northern hemisphere will begin to
match that of the southern hemisphere as the forests of the northern
hemisphere are further decimated.  

  
 Taken at Alert Bay, in the arctic circle of Northern Canada. The large dips
and peaks of the seasonal variations in the northern hemisphere closely
match the seasonal variation caused by the cessation of free oxygen
regeneration by the deciduous component of terrestrial forests over the
winter months. In the southern hemisphere, the seasonal dips and peaks of
atmospheric free oxygen are caused primarily by the seasonal flux and flow
of marine photosynthesis, and the temperature-driven seasonal up welling and
down draft of cold water.  

----------------------------------------------------------------

HAARP and the heavy ionization of the upper atmosphere causing O2 to combine
irrevocably with fossil fuel carbon aloft. 

A. S. Schlachter, K. H. Berkner, W. G. Graham, R. V. Pyle, P. J. Schneider,
K. R. Stalder, J. W. Stearns, and J. A. Tanis, "Charge State Dependence of
Electron Loss from Hydrogen by Collisions with Heavy, Highly-Stripped
Ions,"  paper 2T 7, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 25 , 868 (1980).

"These German scientists from the Max Planck Institute of Nuclear Physics in
Heidelberg go on to say that their measurements "have for the first time
detected in the upper troposphere large positive ions with mass numbers up
to 2500"

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2652


Duh.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=HAARP+heavy+ionization+of+upper+atmosphere&btnG=Search






-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com