On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:44:04 +0100, UseNetOnly@t-online.de wrote:

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:20:02 -0500, www.freedomtofascism.com
<truth@r.us> wrote:

Logic is dualistic per definition.

Proof?

Sure. Something is either true or false.

Then you agree you lied souls.

Why are you lying, when you know you're lying?

Remember our friends are reading your mind. :->

There is no evidence that any human has something which never has been
proven to exist, ie a soul.  You can't prove the soul exists by citing that
someone is refuting your claim because there is no evidence for a soul.

The soul is a religious myth and until you prove it exists it is relegated
to the realm of religious delusions not founded in reality.

The criteria for reality is that something can be weighed and measured.

You have yet to find a soul, let alone prove it exists.

C.

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com