On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:55:10 -0500, www.freedomtofascism.com
<truth@r.us> wrote:

Logic is dualistic per definition.

Proof?

Sure. Something is either true or false.

Then you agree you lied souls.

NO

Why are you lying, when you know you're lying?

Why did you kill your mother when she found out that you're a lesbian?

Remember our friends are reading your mind. :->

You have no friends, nobody reads my mind.

There is no evidence that any human has something which never has been
proven to exist, ie a soul.  You can't prove the soul exists by citing that
someone is refuting your claim because there is no evidence for a soul.

Without your soul you would not exist let alone be conscious.

The soul is a religious myth and until you prove it exists it is relegated
to the realm of religious delusions not founded in reality.

So?
Existence is a religious myth until you prove that you (or anything
else) exist.  The realm of physical delusions is not founded in
reality.

The criteria for reality is that something can be weighed and measured.

That's not "the criterion" for reality but for your limited view of
it.
Hint: there is another half of your brain that you never seem to use.

You have yet to find a soul, let alone prove it exists.

I am surrounded by souls ... quadrillions of them.
And as to "existence": I am my best proof!.

C.

P.S.: You lack understanding of the greater part of everything. Such a
discussion is as useful as an argument over imaginary numbers with
a child just starting school.