On Mar 25, 1:06 am, Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA <scie...@zzz.com>
wrote:
Modern Man Traced To Mutant DNA - ET Intervention?
Greetings Dear Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA.
I hope all is going good with the technological
and intellectual and advanced abilities developments.
Apart from many other interesting websites and YouTube
videos I've been following Project Camelot including Leo
Zagami and the European illuminati idiot rants and stupid
lifestyle.
True or not, here goes ..........
Quote: "Leo Lyon Zagami, ex-member of the Comitato
Esecutivo Massonico - the Masonic Executive Committee
- of Monte Carlo, was, until recently, a high level
member of the Italian Illuminati. He is a 33rd degree
Freemason, and a senior member of the infamous P2
Lodge. He was the 'prince': prepared to take over
after the older Illuminati 'king', Licio Gelli. He is
of a Scottish-Sicilian Illuminati aristocrat
bloodline."
"unfortunately brainwashed against me by the Fethullah
Gulen Movement (a sectarian version of Islam close to
the Jesuits) and some people in the Norwegian
political and masonic establishment who obviously
advised my wife to distance herself asap from me and
my anti-NWO position if she wanted to get back in
their evil and sick political game, and Fatma
unfortunately wants to be a politician again."
All I can say is, what a lot of inbred mafia loony
narrow minded lost pathetic power war mongering
clueless time wasting brain washed dark lord frothing
wannabees.
Even the general public with spare time and the
internet these days have more brains and love and
understanding and potential.
And that's why the European illuminati idiots now
desire advanced mind control devices to zap the
masses.
Because the European illuminati idiots would go insane
if the public masses were more loving and intelligent.
And no wonder DARPA is inventing those advanced robots
...........
i.e. "Boston Dynamics Big Dog" (new video March 2008)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww
Put some Area51 extraterrestrial reverse engineered
weapons on that
and send 10,000 of them to Europe to clean up the old
inbred mafia scum
and planet Earth's people will be a cleaner more
thoughtful caring happier bunch.
I've met some really bad people in my time on Earth.
Thieves in Australia, Yakuza in Japan, and Russians
here in New Zealand.
They were mostly hopeless, power hungry, grotty,
selfish, inbred, careless, stupid, narrow minded,
uneducated, cultish, zombies.
But thought they were more important than everyone
except their family and a few gang friends, just
because
they stole a lot of money and got rich from theft or
drug sales, etc.
That's why I respect HVAC and Ugly Bob, they are
straight talkers and well educated.
and like good olde HVAC said ... "it's either us or
them".
and like good olde Ugly Bob ... "bomb the idiots".
But oh no, I'm not supposed to be talking like "send
the robots!!!"
Because the real me would build huge advanced
universities around the world
for the police to send certain types to, for good
education and care.
For example this is very inspiring ...
http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/19529-michael-moore-cut-this-scene-from-sicko-because-no-one-would-believe-it
With that attitude we can turn shit into gold.
Not be shits like the shits.
Anyway, the European illuminati idiot rants I read
just join dots and confirm the "Do You Wish That We
Show Up" message.
i.e. Quote:
"Many human beings have been in visual, auditory,
tactile or psychic contact with such ships, some of
which are under occult powers that "govern" you."
and ...
"For negative multidimensional beings that play a part
in the exercise of power in the shadow of human
oligarchy, discretion is motivated by their will to
keep their existence and seizure unknown. For us,
discretion is motivated by the respect of the human
free will that people can exercise to manage their own
affairs so that they can reach technical and spiritual
maturity on their own. Humankind's entrance into the
family of galactic civilizations is greatly expected."
Those mafia and narrow minded cults are stupid and
upset because they can't find peace and joy and broad
level headed thinking and love in their own minds.
And they are angry because they don't have some
abilities that they desire.
Thus they end up trapped and think the only way
forward is to dumb other people down.
Whereas some really excellent people have come out of
the USA military.
With the attitude of "lets not keep all this secret".
"let's bring it out and deal with it".
For example excellent men ...
Command Sargent Major Robert O. Dean.
Colonel Phillip J. Corso.
Many others, and some working with The Disclosure
Project, etc.
http://www.disclosureproject.org
Our future is to go into space with motherships.
With the correct attitude to care and study about the
Milky Way Galaxy.
We have to start right here on planet Earth.
No more mafia run companies, polluting, bad drugs,
cigarettes, booze, prostitution, crime, illegal waste
dumping, money greed, hurting people, and all the
things they do wrong for money to stay in power to do
more bad shit to make more money.
It a 3,000 year long same old stupid attitude.
Fortunately the internet is helping.
Sir Arthur CB Doctor Who Leflaffers ASA ...........
1.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=eJ78ZnSUSH4
2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BfNqhV5hg4
_____________________________________
* * * * * Copy and Paste * * * * *
Internet History
1969 - Birth of a Network
The Internet as we know it today, in the mid-1990s, traces it origins
back to a Defense Department project in 1969. The subject of the
project was wartime digital communications. At that time the telephone
system was about the only theater-scale communications system in use.
A major problem had been identified in its design - its dependence on
switching stations that could be targeted during an attack. Would it
be possible to design a network that could quickly reroute digital
traffic around failed nodes? A possible solution had been identified
in theory. That was to build a "web" of datagram network, called an
"catenet", and use dynamic routing protocols to constantly adjust the
flow of traffic through the catenet. The Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) launched the DARPA Internet Program.
1970s - Infancy
DARPA Internet, largely the plaything of academic and military
researchers, spent more than a decade in relative obscurity. As
Vietnam, Watergate, the Oil Crisis, and the Iranian Hostage Crisis
rolled over the nation, several Internet research teams proceeded
through a gradual evolution of protocols. In 1975, DARPA declared the
project a success and handed its management over to the Defense
Communications Agency. Several of today's key protocols (including IP
and TCP) were stable by 1980, and adopted throughout ARPANET by 1983.
Mid 1980s - The Research Net
Let's outline key features, circa-1983, of what was then called
ARPANET. A small computer was a PDP-11/45, and a PDP-11/45 does not
fit on your desk. Some sites had a hundred computers attached to the
Internet. Most had a dozen or so, probably with something like a VAX
doing most of the work - mail, news, EGP routing. Users did their work
using DEC VT-100 terminals. FORTRAN was the word of the day. Few
companies had Internet access, relying instead on SNA and IBM
mainframes. Rather, the Internet community was dominated by
universities and military research sites. It's most popular service
was the rapid email it made possible with distant colleagues. In
August 1983, there were 562 registered ARPANET hosts (RFC 1296).
UNIX deserves at least an honorable mention, since almost all the
initial Internet protocols were developed first for UNIX, largely due
to the availability of kernel source (for a price) and the relative
ease of implementation (relative to things like VMS or MVS). The
University of California at Berkeley (UCB) deserves special mention,
because their Computer Science Research Group (CSRG) developed the BSD
variants of AT&T's UNIX operating system. BSD UNIX and its derivatives
would become the most common Internet programming platform.
Many key features of the Internet were already in place, including the
IP and TCP protocols. ARPANET was fundamentally unreliable in nature,
as the Internet is still today. This principle of unreliable delivery
means that the Internet only makes a best-effort attempt to deliver
packets. The network can drop a packet without any notification to
sender or receiver. Remember, the Internet was designed for military
survivability. The software running on either end must be prepared to
recognize data loss, retransmitting data as often as necessary to
achieve its ultimate delivery.
Late 1980s - The PC Revolution
Driven largely by the development of the PC and LAN technology,
subnetting was standardized in 1985 when RFC 950 was released. LAN
technology made the idea of a "catenet" feasible - an internetwork of
networks. Subnetting opened the possibilities of interconnecting LANs
with WANs.
The National Science Foundation (NSF) started the Supercomputer
Centers program in 1986. Until then, supercomputers such as Crays were
largely the playthings of large, well-funded universities and military
research centers. NSF's idea was to make supercomputer resources
available to those of more modest means by constructing five
supercomputer centers around the country and building a network
linking them with potential users. NSF decided to base their network
on the Internet protocols, and NSFNET was born. For the next decade,
NSFNET would be the core of the U.S. Internet, until its privatization
and ultimate retirement in 1995.
Domain naming was stable by 1987 when RFC 1034 was released. Until
then, hostnames were mapped to IP address using static tables, but the
Internet's exponential growth had made this practice infeasible.
In the late 1980s, important advances related poor network performance
with poor TCP performance, and a string of papers by the likes of
Nagle and Van Jacobson (RFC 896, RFC 1072, RFC 1144, RFC 1323) present
key insights into TCP performance.
The 1987 Internet Worm was the largest security failure in the history
of the Internet. More information can be found in RFC 1135. All things
considered, it could happen again.
Early 1990s - Address Exhaustion and the Web
In the early 90s, the first address exhaustion crisis hit the Internet
technical community. The present solution, CIDR, will sustain the
Internet for a few more years by making more efficient use of IP's
existing 32-bit address space. For a more lasting solution, IETF is
looking at IPv6 and its 128-bit address space, but CIDR is here to
stay.
Crisis aside, the World Wide Web (WWW) has been one of Internet's most
exciting recent developments. The idea of hypertext has been around
for more than a decade, but in 1989 a team at the European Center for
Particle Research (CERN) in Switzerland developed a set of protocols
for transferring hypertext via the Internet. In the early 1990s it was
enhanced by a team at the National Center for Supercomputing
Applications (NCSA) at the University of Illinois - one of NSF's
supercomputer centers. The result was NCSA Mosaic, a graphical, point-
and-click hypertext browser that made Internet easy. The resulting
explosion in "Web sites" drove the Internet into the public eye.
Mid 1990s - The New Internet
Of at least as much interest as Internet's technical progress in the
1990s has been its sociological progress. It has already become part
of the national vocabulary, and seems headed for even greater
prominence. It has been accepted by the business community, with a
resulting explosion of service providers, consultants, books, and TV
coverage. It has given birth to the Free Software Movement.
The Free Software Movement owes much to bulletin board systems, but
really came into its own on the Internet, due to a combination of
forces. The public nature of the Internet's early funding ensured that
much of its networking software was non-proprietary. The emergence of
anonymous FTP sites provided a distribution mechanism that almost
anyone could use. Network newsgroups and mailing lists offered an open
communication medium. Last but not least were individualists like
Richard Stallman, who wrote EMACS, launched the GNU Project and
founded the Free Software Foundation. In the 1990s, Linus Torvalds
wrote Linux, the popular (and free) UNIX clone operating system.
The explosion of capitalist conservatism, combined with a
growing awareness of Internet's business value, has led to major
changes in the Internet community. Many of them have not been for the
good.
First, there seems to be a growing departure from Internet's
history of open protocols, published as RFCs. Many new protocols are
being developed in an increasingly proprietary manner. IGRP, a
trademark of Cisco Systems, has the dubious distinction as the most
successful proprietary Internet routing protocol, capable only of
operation between Cisco routers. Other protocols, such as BGP, are
published as RFCs, but with important operational details omitted. The
notoriously mis-named Open Software Foundation has introduced a whole
suite of "open" protocols whose specifications are available - for a
price - and not on the net. I am forced to wonder: 1) why do we need a
new RPC? and 2) why won't OSF tell us how it works?
People forget that businesses have tried to run digital
communications networks in the past. IBM and DEC both developed
proprietary networking schemes that only ran on their hardware.
Several information providers did very well for themselves in the 80s,
including LEXIS/NEXIS, Dialog, and Dow Jones. Public data networks
were constructed by companies like Tymnet and run into every major US
city. CompuServe and others built large bulletin board-like systems.
Many of these services still offer a quality and depth of coverage
unparalleled on the Internet (examine Dialog if you are skeptical of
this claim). But none of them offered nudie GIFs that anyone could
download. None of them let you read through the RFCs and then write a
Perl script to tweak the one little thing you needed to adjust. None
of them gave birth to a Free Software Movement. None of them caught
people's imagination.
The very existence of the Free Software Movement is part of the
Internet saga, because free software would not exist without the net.
"Movements" tend to arise when progress offers us new freedoms and we
find new ways to explore and, sometimes, to exploit them. The Free
Software Movement has offered what would be unimaginable when the
Internet was formed - games, editors, windowing systems, compilers,
networking software, and even entire operating systems available for
anyone who wants them, without licensing fees, with complete source
code, and all you need is Internet access. It also offers challenges,
forcing us to ask what changes are needed in our society to support
these new freedoms that have touched so many people. And it offers
chances at exploitation, from the businesses using free software
development platforms for commercial code, to the Internet Worm and
the security risks of open systems.
People wonder whether progress is better served through
government funding or private industry. The Internet defies the
popular wisdom of "business is better". Both business and government
tried to build large data communication networks in the 1980s.
Business depended on good market decisions; the government researchers
based their system on openness, imagination and freedom. Business
failed; Internet succeeded. Our reward has been its commercialization.
For the next few years, the Internet will almost certainly be content-
driven. Although new protocols are always under development, we have
barely begun to explore the potential of just the existing ones. Chief
among these is the World Wide Web, with its potential for simple on-
line access to almost any information imaginable. Yet even as the
Internet intrudes into society, remember that over the last two
decades "The Net" has developed a culture of its own, one that may
collide with society's. Already business is making its pitch to
dominate the Internet. Already Congress has deemed it necessary to
regulate the Web. The big questions loom unanswered: How will society
change the Internet... and how will the Internet change society?