| Subject: Re: Can we all agree to eliminate ALL DEBUNKERS once and for all/History of debunking |
| From: Bob Casanova |
| Date: 06/07/2008, 22:18 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,sci.skeptic |
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 00:22:08 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA <science@zzz.com>:
Bob Casanova wrote:On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 04:52:25 -0700 (PDT), the followingInability to understand the post to which you thought you were responding, noted.To Casanobrain: Inability to debunk any facts
Confirmation of inability to understand English noted. For the comprehension-challenged (that's you), this means that my post didn't attempt to "debunk any facts". <snip>-- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless