it's kinda scary...  the thought of 'ufologists' banning outright any 
dissenting views.  It is their organization, and they've the right to ban 
those nasty naysayers.. but is it really the smart thing to do?  Should they 
perhaps ban also the true believers who get their info from psychic contact 
with their handlers on Zeta Reticuli?

Ufology (yeah, i know, it 'doesn't exist') needs more skeptical thinkers. 
Not outright debunkers, but thinkers who will call into questions some 
popular ideas and reports.  This simply activity would cut down on much of 
the 'noise' washing over the phenomenon and would allow others to not only 
learn how they're being misled, but to concentrate sincere efforts on 
worthwhile cases and events rather than wasting time on what can only be 
called 'woowoo'.

"Devin LaRue" <devinlarue@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:e43bc3c6-8e5b-445a-bcfe-16d83be5aee5@40g2000prx.googlegroups.com...

This is a good article by Gustavo Fernandez, translated by Scott
Corrales.

http://www.paranoidsonline.com/2008/11/when-ufologists-become-skeptics.html