| Subject: Re: I'm new here, whom do I Killfile?//spOOks and Debunkers, of course!! |
| From: Bob Casanova |
| Date: 16/01/2009, 21:25 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:56:37 -0000, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Mavisbeacon"
<Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme>:
"Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA" <science@zzz.com> wrote in message
news:6b0e1009-fcd9-4b54-b228-3b05bbbc7645@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
I'm new here, whom do I Killfile?//spOOks and Debunkers, of course!!
A "Friend of the Usenet" wrote:
I'm new here and I am very interested in the facts relating
to extraterrestrials. I am really not concerned with what
skeptics have to say, because I know that it isn’t true. I really need
to know who should I killfile and who I should listen to? Thanks in
advance!
Signed, A Friend of the Usenet
Dear friend of Usenet,
consider killfiling :
-anyone who does not put in their actual name or a handle which they have
used elsewhere on Usenet. anyone who it appears is not accustomed to
posting to Usenet and is using a temporary name is probably a troll.
- anyone who crossposts a request for "facts" to paranormal and alien groups
and sci.skeptic
- anyone who claims "here" is a place or refers to it as one group and
crossposts
- anyone who posts to a skeptic group and actually says why they are
posting is because they are not interested in any reply from that group.
-likewise anyone who posts groups interested in ET's and who states they are
not interested in replies from people interested in ET's
Plus, anyone styling him/her/itself "Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers ASA".
Oh, wait, you already covered that in most of your
suggestions.
Never mind...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless