On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:35:49 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr4e7@4ax.com>"
<extraterrestrial.saucer@groom.lake>:

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:44:55 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:15:32 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr4e7@4ax.com>"
<extraterrestrial.saucer@groom.lake>:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:48:14 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:

[Re: This idiot's question about whether we know what
gravity is yet, and my answer that there is no general
theory of gravity]

But if you
have there's a Nobel waiting for you.

Friday, October 12, 2007
Nobel Peace Prize - Global Farce
http://principalchair.blogspot.com/2007/10/nobel-peace-prize-global-farce.html

Uh-huh...

The Nobel Peace Prize isn't awarded for physics. Do at least
*try* to grasp reality.

<snip free-association, probably drug-induced>

Projection noted, you psychopath.

And the nerve is again scraped raw...

So you think the Nobel Peace Prize *is* awarded for advances
in physics? Uh... OK.

All truth passes through three stages. 
First, it is ridiculed. 
Second, it is violently opposed. 
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. 

Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860) 

http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/schopenhauer 

Unfortunately for you, idiocy is stopped at line 2, and
remains there.
-- 

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
                          - McNameless