On Feb 8, 1:27 pm, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:
"Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA" <scie...@zzz.com>
wrote in messagenews:553e652e-b421-4cc7-b131-4fdf31e47307@g3g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 8, 9:32 am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:
"Hagar" <hs...@surewest.net> wrote in message
news:Ydadnc1dDohPkhLUnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@giganews.com...
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message
news:2292fd40-35f5-43bc-b7b7-3ca82e3f6545@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
I must insist that every debunker LEAVE THE USENET
immediately and
wait for further instructions!
Those instructions are coming over the
secret-channel now.
Wait, here it is: +++All debunkers, NO EXCEPTIONS,
must report to your
nearest FEMA camp for processing!+++
Wow! I knew this wonderful day would come! Hooray
for America , home
of the Brave.
Now then, there is a little matter to finish.
Attention: Casanobrain,
Borsch, Hagar, VD-VAC, CUJO and others, please
make
your way to these
FEMA camps as soon as possible. Thank you for your
cooperation!!
End of scheduled transmission!!!
*********************
Corrected version:
We must insist that all idiots LEAVE THE USENET
immediately
and wait for further instructions from nurse
Cratchett!
Those instructions are coming over the
secret-channel
now.
Wait, here it is: +++All idiots, NO EXCEPTIONS,
must
report
to the nearest nut house for processing!+++
Wow! I knew this wonderful day would come! Hooray
for America , home of the Brave.
Now then, there is a little matter to finish.
Attention: Casanobrain,
Borsch, Hagar, VD-VAC, CUJO and others, please make
sure
the USENET Groups are kept free of the likes of one
Artio CB
LipFlapper and Co. Shoot to kill, take no
prisoners.
Thank you for your cooperation!!
End of scheduled transmission!!!
Transmission received and acknowledged.
Am engaging super kook anti-idiot missile
immediately.
Holeflapper et all should be expunged ASAP.
Ha-ha, you are so NOT funny Borsch.
So, just how serious is the UFO problem? Are aliens
really
among us? If so, what do they want?
Extraordinary amount of BS expunged. <<<
Actually the aliens do not want anything.
spOOk blather eliminated!
For those new to the Usenet, Borsch has been outed as a spOOK, most
likely the NSA, his role here is to disrupt these groups. On that
mission he has failed miserably again and again. Too bad Borsch.
UFO Danger Zone. Terror and Death in Brazil -- Where Next?
by Noah's Dove (noahdove@lightspeed.bc.ca)
UFO Terror and Death in Brazil
by Bob Pratt
Horus House, Qual. soft, 345pp.
This is it -- the UFO book of the year -- and it'll curl your
toenails!
Bob Pratt has spent 18 years investigating UFO cases in Brazil, and
has
backed up his investigation with eleven trips there for first-hand
field
work. What he found was so unlike UFO activity elsewhere in the world
that it screams out to be brought to the world's attention. To quote:
"UFOs have been particularly grim news for people living in the small
towns and forests of central and northeastern Brazil. Their
encounters
have often lead to injury and even death..." This work ought to
shatter
the fantasies shared by so many in comfortably civilized countries --
that these alien beings are basically benevolent or benign in their
intentions, and they might even guide humanity to a true New Age of
peace, brotherhood and harmony. Try to tell that to the descendants
of
those who have been massacred at the hands of aliens in Brazil! Try
to
read this book and walk away from it with your precious conceptions
about the UFO experience intact. My bet is, you'll be staggered by
the
implications raised here. This is the first book to document genuine
danger from UFO encounters.
Related Homicide in Brazil: The Complete Story By G. Cope Schellhorn
If this case is authentically UFO-related - and at this time I have no
reason to believe it is not - then all of us are going to have to
reevaluate
to one degree or another our tentative conclusions as to the possible
specific intentions, moral perspectives and general agenda that some
of our
extraterrestrial visitors may have.
There have been rumors of homicidal, UFO-related, human mutilation
cases for
some time now but hard evidence has been lacking. Until, perhaps, now.
Brazilian ufologist Encarnacion Zapata Garcia and Dr. Rubens Goes have
recently presented a series of sensational photographs, obtained from
police
files which mimic the wounds of countless UFO-related animal
mutilation
cases that have been reported in Europe and North, Central and South
America
since the 1960s. On first glance they would seem to be ufology's worst
nightmare.
What is more disturbing is that Brazilian urologists and police have
intimated that there may be at least a dozen or more cases similar to
the
recently uncovered Guarapiranga reservoir case. If this is true, it is
somewhat doubtful that any of this potential new material will ever
see the
light of day, given the official attitudes now prevailing in Western
power
circles. But we can be grateful for fortuitous disclosures, and the
Guarapiranga case and it's accompanying photographs seem to be just
that. A
great stroke of luck, albeit a dismaying one. Obviously if the
Guarapiranga
data is legitimate, then it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain
the
position that all visitors are demonstrating a relatively friendly
attitude
toward humans, regardless of what their specific agenda(s) may be. The
Guarapiranga situation indicates that there is at least one group of
alien
visitors to the planet who have a complete disdain for human
sensibilities,
who, in fact, could care less about the value of human life.
When I learned of the Guarapiranga case through Brazilian ufologist
A.J.
Gevaerd, who first published the related photos in his magazine UFO,
my
interest was stimulated and I quickly made plans for a trip to Brazil.
In
Sao Paulo I met Encarnacion Garcia at the home of well known ufologist
Claudeir Covo and talked with her later at length. Then I traveled to
Campo
Grande and questioned Gevaerd. He was kind enough to supply me with
second
generation photographs (the best available) of the Guarapiranga
reservoir
victim having himself become thoroughly convinced that the evidence
supporting the case was authentic and that the case was UFO-related. I
came
to the same conclusion because all other alternatives were neither
supported
by facts nor good logic, whereas the similarities to numerous cattle
mutilations which I had studied in the United States were startling,
exactly
paralleling what I have seen many times before.
The specifics of the case are as follows:
Encarnacion Garcia learned from her friend, Dr. Rubens Goes, that he
was in
possession of some rather "odd" photos which had been given to him by
his
cousin, police technician, Rubens Sergio. These were official photos
of a
body that had been found near Guarapiranga reservoir on the 29th of
September, 1988, of an unnamed male who was, however, later
identified. The
name of this man has been withheld from all media investigators,
including
UFO investigators, at the request of his relatives.
After studying the photos, Encarnacion Garcia was impressed with how
similar
the wounds of the body were to those found on the carcasses of so many
UFO-related mutilated animals, knowledge which the original
investigating
police officials and medical doctors involved with the case did not
possess.
Surprisingly, Dr. Cuenca, head of the primary investigation, offered
his
files on the case. This is the stroke of luck which I previously
mentioned
and for which we can all be thankful. These included the all-.
important
autopsy description to which I will momentarily refer.
The initial police report, however, was not extraordinary in nature
except
for the recognition that the body, although extremely mutilated, had
not met
with unusual violence; that is, there were no signs of struggle or the
application of bondage of any kind.
It was the autopsy report itself which was most revealing, especially
when
we compare the remarks made there with what we have learned from
animal
mutilation cases elsewhere. It is imperative to remember, as I have
stated
previously, that the individuals conducting the autopsy had no
knowledge of
similar animal mutilation cases. This makes the official remarks of
the
report all the more revealing in retrospect.
Encarnacion Garcia received copies of seven photos. I have included
the five
most revealing ones here with a description and commentary. The work
of the
perpetrators of this atrocity: the kinds of cuts made, the precision
of the
cuts, the removal of whole internal organs through small apertures,
the lack
of bleeding, the failure of the body to smell or decompose rapidly -
all
these are hallmarks of UFO-related animal mutilations. These
peculiarities
would seem to rule out Satanists, revenge- seekers or casual
mutilators and
go beyond even the capacities of a modern Jack the Ripper.
photo #I: Face and upper torso photo. The body was in perfect
condition.
Rigor mortis had not set in and it was estimated that the victim had
been
killed approximately 48 to 72 hours previously. There were no signs of
animal predation or putrefaction which might be expected. Strangely,
there
was no odor to the cadaver. Bleeding from the wounds had been minimal.
The
black coloration found in the face area and in other places within the
photo
is partly due to low light exposure when this photo and others were
taken.
It is also partly due to coagulated blood in the wound areas.
As can clearly be seen, flesh and lips have been excised around the
mandibles, as is common in cattle and other animal mutilations, the
autopsy
report noted that "the eyes and ears were also removed and the mouth
cavity
was emptied." Removal of these body parts, including the tongue as
here, is
common enough in animal mutilation cases.
As Encarnacion Garcia rightly recognized, if a comparison of the
victim with
animal mutilation cases is made, "You can see they are the same - and
that
is also the conclusion of experienced doctors." The doctors drew their
conclusion only after they had been shown photographs of similar
animal
mutilation cases, cases with which they were not previously familiar.
The autopsy report states: "There has been a removal of extensive
tissue
along many parts of the face, head and neck of the victim... There has
also
been extraction of ocular tissue, eyes, auditive internal and external
organs (ears) and entire parts of the head. The tongue and several
muscles
were also extracted."
The kinds of cuts on the cadaver are what we have come to expect in
UFO-related animal mutilation cases. Of primary interest is their
precision.
The "surgery" (or butchery, if you will) was done with agility and
care and
probably with speed. The lack of profuse bleeding suggests the use of
a
laser-like instrument producing acute heat, thus cauterizing almost
immediately the edge of the wounds. This is a speculation on my part,
however, :although there are numerous precedents. Many of the cases
studied
by Dr. John Altshuler in the United States exhibit this kind of high
heat,
rapid surgery. Whether it would still be possible to test fragments of
the
flesh from the victim's wound areas is doubtful. Suffice it to say the
wounds appear to be exact replicas of cases studied by Dr. Altshuler,
Tom
Adams, Bob Pratt, Ted Oliphant, Linda Howe, Colman VonKeviczky and
myself.
Photo #2: (Above) Face and upper torso with arms outstretched. Perhaps
it is
best to begin here with several quotes from the autopsy report. "The
axillary regions on both sides showed soft spots where organs had been
removed. Incisions were made on the face, internal thorax, abdomen,
legs,
arms, and chest." As Garcia observed, the doctors stated that these
wounds
were quite uncommon. The report also observes, "Shoulders and arms
have
perforations of 1 to 1.5 inches in diameter where tissue and muscles
were
extracted. The edges of the perforations were uniform and so was their
size.
The chest had shrunk due to the removal of internal organs."
In other words, internal organs were removed or sucked somehow through
these
small circular incisions. Why such a technique? Some doctors today are
using
a similar method to remove diseased tissue and organs from their human
subjects - but this kind of procedure injures those organs in the
process.
Did the "surgeons" who worked on this victim care whether the organs
were
injured or not? What kind of specimens were they looking for? What
kind of
research is this? Wouldn't it be easier and more medically expedient
to
abduct a human specimen and study it live, including its anatomy and
physiology, in a properly equipped laboratory? It would appear that
the
perpetrators of this act did not care if the man's life was lost nor
did
they care if the body were found. Here we have strong indication of a
total
disregard for the specimen and, by extension, for human life in
general. The
body was left as trash. What does this say about the perpetrators and
their
attitudes?
The photo clearly shows the symmetrical holes in the man's arms. One
arm
clearly shows the sunken area near the perforation clearly,
demonstrating
where muscle has been extracted. The shrunken chest area also
indicates a
similar process of internal extractions. It is significant that the
police
and medical examiners were convinced the holes found in the head,
arms,
stomach, anus and legs were not produced by bullet wounds.
Photo #3: Close up of the left side of the victim's head. Here we see
that
the ear is cleanly excised. As the report states, "auditive internal
and
external" matter was removed The photo does not show the small holes
discovered in the cranium. These were detected, however, by the
medical
examiners. How much, if any, of the brain tissue was removed is not
stated.
Photo #4: Close up of lower torso including thighs. The stretcher,
pants and
cord that are visible belonged to the rescue team. The autopsy report
continues, "You also find the removal of the belly button leaving a
1.5 inch
hole in the abdomen and a depressed abdominal cavity showing the
removal of
the intestines." Brazilian doctors who later viewed the evidence were
left
nonplused by the hole in the umbilical area where, it appeared, "a
great
amount of internal organs were extracted. The edge of the hole was
perfect
and shows a precision cut. Also, the abdominal area of the body was
very
shrunken because of organ removal." The original autopsy report notes
that
"the scrotum was also removed by a 3 x 1.5 cm. elliptical incision."
Strangely, the penis itself was left intact although it appeared to
have
been stretched to about twice its normal length. Why excise the
scrotum
without taking the penis? Human logic is defied by such actions. We
are
aware, however, of the great similarity here with other animal
mutilation
cases, particularly female cattle where it is not unusual to see anus,
teats, vagina and uterus extracted. But why exactly this is done is as
big a
mystery as who the exact perpetrators are, although there is enough
strong
circumstantial evidence to implicate UFO involvement.
The hole in the left leg duplicates in size the umbilical hole and the
arm
hole previously discussed. In the words of the autopsy report, "It was
an...
elliptical incision of about 3 x 1. 5 cm...The penis was stretched and
had
no signs of being cut. The testicles were extracted with a precision
cut."
Rather startling is the lack of pubic hair, as if the victim had been
readied for surgery.
Early on in the investigation, Brazilian official investigators
considered
the possibility that the castration of the victim was an act of
revenge.
They soon rejected this theory, however, because it could not account
for
the remaining wounds and the other peculiarities related to the body.
What
is more, revenge seekers who castrate usually excise the penis, not
just the
scrotum.
Photo #5: Victim lying on his stomach. The autopsy report specifies:
-"Removal of the anus and a hole between the second and third
toes...The
anal orifice of the victim was extracted with a large incision about 3
by 6
inches in diameter. The rectum and other internal parts of the human
discharge system were also removed. It is probable that even some of
the
internal organs of the man could have been removed through this
incision."
What is most compelling about the anal incision and the extraction of
anal
and digestive tract tissue is that it is a carbon copy of the surgery
we
have seen in so many UFO-related animal mutilation cases. Are we
supposed to
believe a revengeful human or a group of Satanists are capable of such
precise, difficult, surgical techniques/procedures which leave even
medical
professionals perplexed as to how they could have been done? I think
not.
Has the Brazilian and/or American government staged a little
demonstration
at the Guarapiranga reservoir to frighten UFO investigators and the
general
public into fearing all extraterrestrial contact? In other words, are
we
faced with a gruesome, carefully orchestrated display of
misinformation?
Possibly, but probably not, and my reasons for believing this are
several.
First, it would seem a fortuitous turn of events that ufologist
Encarnacion
Zapata Garcia had the right friend(s) in the right places at the right
time.
If our government, and presumably the Brazilian government, has kept a
lid
on similarly sensational material in the past - and I have no doubt
there is
more than ample evidence supporting such a contention - here we have
an
accidental bubble that has, against all odds, escaped the pot. It is
our
good fortune, you might say.
The photos are definitely causing a stir; causing many people,
including
some UFO investigators, to do some new thinking. But the powers that
control
lids will be carefully double-checking in the near future to make sure
the
pot is as secure as possible. Thus I would not get my hopes up that
additional homicidal, UFO-related human mutilation cases and graphic
photographs accompanying them will surface in the near future.
If we discard the possibility of the Guarapiranga case as a piece of
misinformation, we are left with several intriguing alternatives. Is
this
the infrequent act of a rogue extraterrestrial group which from time
to time
enjoys indulging themselves in a pathological blood sport at the
expense of
humans? Perhaps. More likely, I think, we are indirect witnesses to an
intentionally contemptuous act by a group or species of
extraterrestrial
origin who would like to give other visiting species a bad name and,
as a
bonus, harness mankind into a greater fear-mentality than already
binds it.
But these are only speculations and we will have to wait until a
future time
for a greater truth when more thorough revelations, and evidence that
supports them, become available.
Do we have any precedents to the Guarapiranga case? Yes, we do. At
least one
good example and the rumors of possibly another. The case of Sgt.
Jonathan P
Louette, who was stationed at White Sands Missile Test Range in 1956
and
whose mutilated body was found on the Range three days after an Air
Force
major had witnessed his abduction by a "disk shaped" object, bares a
striking resemblance to the Guarapiranga situation. Louette's genitals
had
been removed, his rectum cored out with surgical precision and his
eyes
excised in a manner quite similar to the incisions made upon our
Guarapiranga victim. And then there is the rumor of the Texas
mutilation
case which occurred - and was quickly hushed up - in the mid '60s. I
have
had verification of the legitimacy of this by two intelligence agency
personnel, one active and one retired, but have not had time to
investigate
further.
At present, the rumors of human body parts found on at least one
crashed UFO
in the 1940s, body parts found in a barn in the state of Oregon
several
years ago or the rumor of a mutilated Vietnam War B-52 crew will have
to
remain just that - rumors, until the lid accidentally, albeit
infrequently,
comes ajar again and we have some solid evidence. But there is no
denying
that the Guarapiranga reservoir case has taken us far beyond rumor.
The
evidence is unmistakable and it is sobering. On the one hand, it
points
stunningly in a UFO-related direction. On the other hand, I believe it
would
be wise of us to draw a tentative conclusion if other less violent
cases
have not already led us to do so. We should not, in most cases,
generalize
about our extraterrestrial visitors; neither about their motives ,
morals
nor research agendas. And one addendum also seems advisable: In an age
when
almost anything has come to seem possible, if not probable, either
cosmically or here on earth, the wisest course might be to let our
extraterrestrial visitors demonstrate their friendliness before
jumping to
conclusions about their philanthropy and opening the door too wide.
After
all, Little Red Riding Hood, nine times out of ten, is no match for
the wolf
at the door.
We have seen in the past, especially in Brazil, many cases where Human
beings have been attacked by UFOs and their occupants. This is an
undeniable
reality that many researchers do not want to face. The Fenomeno Chupa-
Chupa
or "Suck-Suck" phenomenon which occurred in the Amazon and
northeastern part
of the country in the '70s and '80s produced hundreds of injured
people and
ultimately some fatalities. These mostly impoverished people were
usually
attacked by small probes (3-6 inches in diameter), probably unmanned,
little
UFOs which emitted strong, burning beams of light. Many of the victims
suffered not only burns but a significant loss of blood (thus the
"suck-suck" appellation) during their encounters. Some, such as Luiz
Fernandes Barroso, suffered appreciable mental as well as physical
incapacitation. Barroso's mind was reduced to that of a two-year-old
long
before his death.
In North America, reports of brutal manhandling by UFO occupants are
much
rarer. If homicidal, UFO-related human mutilations have taken place
they
have either gone unrecognized for what they really are or have been
adeptly
covered up by official intervention. Whatever the truth may be, the
Guarapiranga reservoir case and the startling photos which accompany
it
should give us pause for thought. I, like ufologist editor A.J.
Gevaerd,
came to the conclusion after reviewing the evidence that UFO-related
mutilators were most probably the perpetrators of the abominations
revealed
by the photographs of the Guarapiranga reservoir victim. And I believe
Gevaerd is probably right when he says most extraterrestrial visitors
seem
neutral in their attitudes towards Earth and earth humans, some are
friendly
and some could care less. We had better learn, I think, to discern the
differences. It might in the long run save our world culture and our
very
lives.
corson@bellsouth.net (corson@bellsouth.net) adds this:
I will tell you this. Much as I try to be non violent, if one of these
Greys
comes near me or my children, I will reach down past my acid fortified
brain
and into my heart that they cannot control and smash their oversized
heads into
the nearest hard surface. James T. Kirk knew how to really roundhouse
an alien,
remember him fighting the Gorn? We will not be enslaved (except to
ourselves
apparently). We apparently are of interest to these drones because we
are
ensouled and they want to be but don't have a belly button (can you
make the
connection?) We also have the fastest emotional switchplate in the
galaxy,
capable of going from pure compassion into hate in an instant.
Superluminal DNA
braiding through glandular based compassion also is theoretically
linked to the
birth of new stars through magnetic wormhole resonance setting up the
fractal
phi wave concrescence disk to develop ecospheres as large as stellar
systems. I
think they may be interested in our sphincters, as such, as they are
analogically synonymic with the structure of this magnetic wormhole
tunneling
and they think maybe they can extract energetic dynamics from the
morphogenetic
components of the DNA at those sites.
Kundalini, the serpent, rises up the
spine to feed the winged, folded over birdbrain, and causes glandular
superluminal braiding of DNA, something they are trying to accomplish
with
these drones. The Draco have been using the monatomic gold to repair
their
mortal coils and have become disensouled and technologically immortal.
They
also take our blood and sex organs to try and absorb whatever the
energetic is
that ensouls us. There is semisubstantiated rumor that they were
feeding off
the pituitaries of the victims at the Nazi death camps. The deal is
this to me.
They do not seem to be self policing, they have no compassion and
therefore are
not ensouled but cloned golems and are worthy of no respect or trust.
The
Apaches were hanging sheep carcasses in the woods for the "devils"
when I was
at the Rainbow Gathering of the Tribes south of Four Corners an FBI
(full
blooded indian;)told me. He was from Big Mountain and they saw
frequent darting
lights there, and said the carcasses were to placate the devils and
keep them
away from the children. They need to keep their fucking meathooks off
of our
children! They are royalty! Or we will get together some knights under
the
banner of St. George and slay the little bastards and any other
attendant
dragons that aren't raingods. Just my heartfelt rant about this state
of
affairs.