| Subject: Re: Debunkers = Scientists? Nope! |
| From: Bob Casanova |
| Date: 13/02/2009, 21:23 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:29:25 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr4e7@4ax.com>"
<earth@is.ending>:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:22:26 -0800 (PST), george <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:47 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:33:51 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr...@4ax.com>"
<ea...@is.ending>:
Debunkers are paid to do what they do.
Wrong again, Anonymous; I punch holes in deluded loons for
free.
But it would be nice if we got paid for such a valuable social action
You are paid to post to usenet.
That's a given.
Well, it seems you *can* be wrong all the time, Anonymous.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless