Bob Casanova wrote:

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:58:33 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers ASA <science@zzz.com>:

Bob Casanova wrote:

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:07:15 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers ASA <science@zzz.com>:

Bob Casanova wrote:

On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:54:24 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by "Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com>:

This is getting pretty redundant...

Yeah, and that's one of your *minor* problems.

...wrong decision...OFFICIAL notice...hard-core specti-bunker...

"Specti-bunker"? A hole in the ground with corrective
lenses?

Run away! Run away!

Debunkers...FACTS...debunkers...facts...stupid!!!

So, Artie/Gary, what about the Famous Specti-Bunkers (TM)?
Any relation to the Fuehrerbunker?

Casanobrain, Report to the closet FEMA camp now!  Debunkers are not
fit to remain in our civilzied society.