On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:32:31 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr4e7@4ax.com>"
<earth@is.ending>:

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:40:48 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:42:27 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr4e7@4ax.com>"
<earth@is.ending>:

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:56:11 -0500, "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr4e7@4ax.com>" <earth@is.ending> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:34:41 -0500, "Message-ID:
<bf5km41latboe7ief3dajgohhnu2hgr4e7@4ax.com>" <earth@is.ending> wrote:

Debunkers are paid to do what they do.

Message-ID: <q158p45oemgt7bj8e0fnao0clg4rrvebhj@4ax.com>

But at the same time their misuse of technology killed them.

Message-ID: <b4s1p4ldpfdtn479lih8kdpj9hug5lkpio@4ax.com>

<crickets>

<crickets>
"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do
that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about
American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the
Americans know it."  - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001

Anyone can fabricate fake quotes. Or do you have a cite?

Cite given, you moron.

So you don't know the meaning of "cite", either. Here's a
hint, Sparky: It's not adding a tag which says "So-and-so on
such-and-such a date"; it's a reference to where the
purported quote can be read, an unbiased news site, for
instance ("Real Christians" and Muslim apologists need not
apply); CNN, Reuters and AP are good references. You think
everyone should take your unsupported word for it? Dream
on...

No,
didn't think so...

"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do
that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about
American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the
Americans know it."  - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001

-- 

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
                          - McNameless