Re: Skeptics or Debunkers?
Subject: Re: Skeptics or Debunkers?
From: garymatalucci@gmail.com
Date: 07/03/2009, 10:57
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic

On Mar 6, 11:07 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote innews:38321ea2-eeed-4706-9d6d-a0f786146dfd@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:



On Mar 6, 10:10 am, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote
innews:8
7555582-5f72-4ef7-a186-0bad68788...@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com:

UFO Enigma Editorial: Skeptics or Debunkers?

<Saucerhead babble flushed>

How about posting something credible...

Your kind has no place amongst us civilized people. Debunkers are now
officially considered as non-people.  I trust you will govern yourself
accordingly under this new edict.  Essentially, you and your cult must
leave now, that goes for you, Hagar and Casanobrain.  Others will be
added to the no-post list when we choose to.  ---transmission ended--

Make me leave. You can't, Artie/Gary.

Let us just say the brief moments the debunkers have left before the
entire globe declares an all-out war against the debunkers should be
used wisely.  But if the debunkers wait too late, not even I will be
able to save you jerks.  Govern yourself accordingly.

Sir Artiø