Re: The updating of this old joke was bound to happen

On Mar 30, 7:49�am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:cb7b016e-cf90-446c-abc1-5a4ff34caa75@y33g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 27, 12:15 pm, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:d3313357-3330-448a-83c9-b9cd10b3b29c@s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 8:24 am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:c7502331-6a22-48bd-b317-6a8f9358e833@s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 25, 6:32 am, "Hagar" <ha...@sahm.name>
wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in
messagenews:dc80bbcc-9665-4154-8e99-da9dbc045660@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 24, 1:12 am, Valentin Gregorievich
Mironov<valentingregorievichmiro...@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Mar 24, 4:25 pm, "Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers A.S.A."

< snip LipFlapper drivel >

Wrong! Debunkers NEED a very nice FEMA Death
camp!
Either you are
with us: honest researchers and concerned
Patriots
or you are with the
Truth-Terrorists: the debunkers and their
supporters, sympathizers,
and enablers.

Why can't Horry be like Obama, have his cake and
eat
it ....
You're such a narrow minded bitch ....
Your goodest Pal, Hagar

Everyday the debunkers are free is one day closer
to
the END OF PLANET
EARTH!! There is no question that in a scant few
days,
every country
will unite for one common cause: the elimination of
ALL
debunkers on
THIS ISLAND EARTH!!! There is a BRAVE NEW WORLD
coming
right on up
and ALL MANKIND is ready for the greatest challenge
in
our history!
But first the debunkers will have to be expunged
once
and for all.
Luckily for us, we know where most of the debunkers
are. Even on
these newsgroups we have most of their names:
Casanobrain, VD-VAC,
Hagar, Borsch and a few others. Please give up and
turn yourselves
in and march right over to the nearest FEMA camp in
your area!!

Howdy HoleFlapper,
It is too late. I tried to give up and become a
little
daisy twinky like you but I could not hack it.
Faggy
Daggies just ain't my bag. Besides you said You
didn't
want me to give up. You always did change your
ittybitty mind in mid stride even when you worked
for
the CIA. So HoleFlapper it is going to be total
WAR.
Be very, very careful as you might become a BugEye
Burger along with them little Grey Aliens that we
grow
on the Chicken Ranch down there in Texas.
We've been over the same material, but lets do it
once again, shall
we.
1) You already have been exposed as a spOOk

Exposed hell! I told you I was a spook. You must
have your head up your ass for not remembering.

2) UFOs are real and so are ETs, they walk on
Earth,
abduct people,
create crop pictographs, have underground and
underwater bases, work
with a certain element of the super-secret
military/corporate faction,
and have shared advanced technology.

You really are dense Holeflapper, I explained to you
that aliens are real. They landed their little
spaceship made up of rubber strips, tinfoil, a rather
tough paper and sticks as described by W.W.Brazel
(ranch owner) on June 14, 1947 in Roswell, New
Mexico.
The items were gathered up and described by Brazel:
The tinfoil, paper, considerable scotch tape and some
tape with flowers printed upon it, and sticks made a
bundle about three feet long and 7 or 8 inches thick,
while the rubber made a bundle about 18 or 20 inches
long and about 8 inches thick. In all he estimated
the
entire lot would have weighed maybe 5 pounds. Now it
is obvious to intelligent believers such as yourself
that the above described items could only be an
interstellar spaceship, especially with the use of so
much Scotch Tape. I wonder where they got so much?
That of course is when we back-engineered the 5 pound
spaceship. Our huge fleet of 5 pound spaceships are
coming to get you. Ho! Ho! Oh yes they are He! He!

3) Debunkers are worthless scum, thus you are a
worthless piece of
scum.

Of course they are, but they are so very much better
than folks such as yourself that it puts you
"believers" in a piss poor light. Debunkers may be
worthless but at least they are not stupid as you
are.

That's all.

Well fine Holeflapper, I'm glad you are done. Now
wipe
yourself, your shit stinks.
Ouch! �Touched a nerve there spOOk! �Ha-ha, again,
debunkers are
worthless. �The proof? �You!!


Being a Believer means never having to say show me, or
even
making a lick of sense!

You really ought to be ashamed to post such pathetic
replies.
But then Believers are such gullible fools.
--
Cap. Harry (Borsch Belt)


The update of an old joke, well, Borsch is an OLD JOKE.
Ha-ha.  I went to the toilet to take a dump, and a debunker came out,
so I flushed it down!!

"Science of Not Knowing" by John E. Mack, M.D.

Despite official skepticism and even cynicism in media, government,
and scientific circles, it must be evident to many Americans that
something extraordinary-at least from the standpoint of the Western
worldview-is going on. No conventional explanation for the thousands
of reported cases of encounters with alien beings has been sufficient,
and this remains true in spite of the fact that the experiencers
themselves would, with rare exceptions, welcome any explanation other
than that they are being visited without their permission by humanoid
creatures from another place.

Yet the debate that is devoted to the UFO abduction phenomenon remains
focused largely on the question of whether or not it is real in the
strictly physical sense. Some skeptics even claim or imply that,
insofar as the physical evidence for the reality of the phenomenon
does not meet standards of scientific proof, we can presume for
practical purposes that it does not exist at all.

But what if the phenomenon were subtle in the sense that it may
manifest in the physical world, but derive from a source which by its
very nature could not provide the kind of hard evidence that would
satisfy skeptics for whom reality is limited to the material? If so,
might we not be losing an opportunity to learn and grow as a species
by remaining so wedded to an epistemology of physical proof?

What if, instead, we were to acknowledge that the abduction phenomenon
is intrinsically mysterious and, ultimately, beyond our present
framework of knowledge? What if we were to admit our puzzlement before
this mystery?

Might not such an attitude of humility become, paradoxically, a way to
enlarge upon what could then be learned? Is it possible that adopting
an open attitude could result in greater knowledge not only about the
physical aspects of the phenomenon, but about numinous dimensions as
well?

And might not this opening of consciousness enable us to learn of
unseen realities now obscured by our too limited epistemology,
allowing us to rediscover the sacred and the divinity in nature and in
ourselves?