Re: The updating of this old joke was bound to happen

On Apr 2, 7:14�am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:85b58c89-753d-4c3d-84fb-ab2fd2e33ec6@q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 30, 7:49 am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:cb7b016e-cf90-446c-abc1-5a4ff34caa75@y33g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 27, 12:15 pm, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:d3313357-3330-448a-83c9-b9cd10b3b29c@s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 8:24 am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net>
wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:c7502331-6a22-48bd-b317-6a8f9358e833@s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 25, 6:32 am, "Hagar" <ha...@sahm.name>
wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in
messagenews:dc80bbcc-9665-4154-8e99-da9dbc045660@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 24, 1:12 am, Valentin Gregorievich
Mironov<valentingregorievichmiro...@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Mar 24, 4:25 pm, "Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers A.S.A."

< snip LipFlapper drivel >

Wrong! Debunkers NEED a very nice FEMA Death
camp!
Either you are
with us: honest researchers and concerned
Patriots
or you are with the
Truth-Terrorists: the debunkers and their
supporters, sympathizers,
and enablers.

Why can't Horry be like Obama, have his cake
and
eat
it ....
You're such a narrow minded bitch ....
Your goodest Pal, Hagar

Everyday the debunkers are free is one day closer
to
the END OF PLANET
EARTH!! There is no question that in a scant few
days,
every country
will unite for one common cause: the elimination
of
ALL
debunkers on
THIS ISLAND EARTH!!! There is a BRAVE NEW WORLD
coming
right on up
and ALL MANKIND is ready for the greatest
challenge
in
our history!
But first the debunkers will have to be expunged
once
and for all.
Luckily for us, we know where most of the
debunkers
are. Even on
these newsgroups we have most of their names:
Casanobrain, VD-VAC,
Hagar, Borsch and a few others. Please give up
and
turn yourselves
in and march right over to the nearest FEMA camp
in
your area!!

Howdy HoleFlapper,
It is too late. I tried to give up and become a
little
daisy twinky like you but I could not hack it.
Faggy
Daggies just ain't my bag. Besides you said You
didn't
want me to give up. You always did change your
ittybitty mind in mid stride even when you worked
for
the CIA. So HoleFlapper it is going to be total
WAR.
Be very, very careful as you might become a
BugEye
Burger along with them little Grey Aliens that we
grow
on the Chicken Ranch down there in Texas.
We've been over the same material, but lets do it
once again, shall
we.
1) You already have been exposed as a spOOk

Exposed hell! I told you I was a spook. You must
have your head up your ass for not remembering.

2) UFOs are real and so are ETs, they walk on
Earth,
abduct people,
create crop pictographs, have underground and
underwater bases, work
with a certain element of the super-secret
military/corporate faction,
and have shared advanced technology.

You really are dense Holeflapper, I explained to
you
that aliens are real. They landed their little
spaceship made up of rubber strips, tinfoil, a
rather
tough paper and sticks as described by W.W.Brazel
(ranch owner) on June 14, 1947 in Roswell, New
Mexico.
The items were gathered up and described by Brazel:
The tinfoil, paper, considerable scotch tape and
some
tape with flowers printed upon it, and sticks made
a
bundle about three feet long and 7 or 8 inches
thick,
while the rubber made a bundle about 18 or 20
inches
long and about 8 inches thick. In all he estimated
the
entire lot would have weighed maybe 5 pounds. Now
it
is obvious to intelligent believers such as
yourself
that the above described items could only be an
interstellar spaceship, especially with the use of
so
much Scotch Tape. I wonder where they got so much?
That of course is when we back-engineered the 5
pound
spaceship. Our huge fleet of 5 pound spaceships are
coming to get you. Ho! Ho! Oh yes they are He! He!

3) Debunkers are worthless scum, thus you are a
worthless piece of
scum.

Of course they are, but they are so very much
better
than folks such as yourself that it puts you
"believers" in a piss poor light. Debunkers may be
worthless but at least they are not stupid as you
are.

That's all.

Well fine Holeflapper, I'm glad you are done. Now
wipe
yourself, your shit stinks.
Ouch! Touched a nerve there spOOk! Ha-ha, again,
debunkers are
worthless. The proof? You!!

Being a Believer means never having to say show me,
or
even
making a lick of sense!

You really ought to be ashamed to post such pathetic
replies.
But then Believers are such gullible fools.
--
Cap. Harry (Borsch Belt)


The update of an old joke, well, Borsch is an OLD JOKE.
Ha-ha. �I went to the toilet to take a dump, and a
debunker came out,
so I flushed it down!!

I doubt that you ever went "to the toilet", because you
are full of shit.


That is sooooo clever Borsch!

A group of CIA-connected scientists was assembled in secret to
evaluate UFOs. CIA documents reveal that five members of the
Scientific Advisory Panel, who were all well-known skeptics, were
given several poor UFO cases to examine and came to the conclusion
that "there was no evidence of a direct threat to national security in
the objects sighted. Flying saucer reports were overloading emergency
reporting channels with false information, clogging up communication
lines, causing alarm, and realistically even if they were real there
was little we could do about them."  Furthermore, the government was
losing the confidence of the people. Our science and aircraft seemed
to be confronted by far superior technology.

The  "Robertson Panel" spent all of twelve hours in a round-table
discussion, analyzing only about a handful of UFO cases.  The Panel
concluded that, "UFOs are not a threat to national security...but
continued reporting of UFOs is a threat."  Their recommendation: The
Government should take immediate steps to strip UFOs of their "aura of
mystery," through a program of public education.  The final report
even used the term, "DEBUNKING."

The Robertson Panel discussions and recommendations centered around
the main problem of eradicating belief in these unidentified flying
objects. Ways of using the news media and movies to discredit UFOs
were discussed and placed into action.  This resulted in the reduction
of public interest around the reality of flying saucers, which even
today still evokes a strong psychological reaction. Such propaganda
techniques included addressing actual UFO cases, which might have been
puzzling at first but later explained away as natural phenomenon.

The panel also discussed various insidious methods that were often
implemented to execute this debunking program.  It was felt strongly
that psychologists familiar with mass psychology should be called in
as advisers to assist with the nature and extent of this program.
These national programs resulted in the National Policy.  The end
result was to debunk any valid sighting, even if it resulted in the
embarrassment of pilots and/or government employees. UFO reports were
denied, debunked and those who saw them were soundly and mercilessly
ridiculed.

Timothy Good in his book Above Top Secret writes: Another sinister
recommendation of the panel was that civilian UFO groups should be
watched "because of their potentially great influence on mass thinking
if widespread sightings should occur. The apparent irresponsibility
and the possible use of such groups for subversive purposes should be
kept in mind." The panel concluded that "the continued emphasis on the
reporting these phenomena does, in these parlous times, result in a
threat to the orderly functioning of the protective organs of the body
politic," and recommended:

a. That the national security agencies take immediate steps to strip
the Unidentified Flying Objects of the special status they have been
given and the aura of mystery they have unfortunately acquired.

b. That the national security agencies institute policies on
intelligence, training, and public education designed to prepare the
material defenses and the morale of the country to recognize most
promptly and to react most effectively to true indications of hostile
intent or action.

Shortly thereafter every effort of the government went into debunking
UFOs even if it would mean embarrassing its own people. It soon became
known the best way to destroy your military career was to report a
UFO. Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, Chief of the Aerial Phenomena Branch
at the Air Technical Intelligence Center, said that the CIA ordered
the Air Force to debunk sightings and debunk witnesses.   "We're
ordered to hide sightings when possible," he told Major Keyhole, "but
if a strong report does get out we have to publish a fast explanation--
make up something to kill the report in a hurry, and also ridicule the
witness, especially if we can't figure out a plausible answer, even if
we have to discredit our own pilots."

The debunking included spying on UFO witnesses and the infiltration of
UFO organizations by the CIA and FBI.  Various effective civilian UFO
organizations have been rendered impotent, and sometimes inactive,
after ex-CIA members have joined their board of directors, the best
example being the ousting of Major Donald Keyhoe from NICAP (National
Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena.).  APRO (Aerial
Phenomena Research Organization) head Jim Lorenzen was also put under
CIA surveillance in 1953, after the recommendations of the Robertson
Panel.  New federal policy resulting from the Robertson Panel includes
Military Policy Orders AFR 200-2 and JANAP 146, which simultaneously
criminalizes the release by any military personnel of UFO-related
information, but makes the reporting of all sightings to immediate
superiors MANDATORY.  The debunking strategy likewise included the
silencing of military personnel through intimidation. Even retired
military personnel risked losing their pension benefits if they talked
about their experiences with UFOs.  That ban continues to this day.

    For three decades, the Military have publicly scoffed at UFOs but
it has been another matter behind the scenes.  A secret order issued
to Air Force base commanders in 1960 stated UFOs should be treated as,
"serious business...directly related to national security."  Public
pressures spurred Congress to hold hearing about UFOs in the
mid-1960's and the Air Force decided enough is enough.  It
commissioned what was to be the ultimate UFO study, directed by Edward
Condon of the University of Colorado.  Condon was a respected
scientist but was hardly impartial about UFOs.  Before the study even
began, he said in a speech that "The Government should get out of the
UFO business, there's nothing to it."  He later wrote, "The authors of
UFO books should be horsewhipped."  There is even evidence that the
studies conclusion were written before the project even began.  To the
surprise of few, the committee declared that further study of UFOs
would be a waste of time.  The Air Force used this as its reason to
finally end Project Bluebook.  UFO researchers have long suspected
that Bluebook was merely for public consumption, that another secret
UFO program existed to handle the most sensitive cases.

     The CIA responds to UFO requests in this fashion: "There is no
CIA program to actively collect information on UFOs, nor has there
been one since the 1950's."  This statement flies in the face of
numerous reports, squeezed out of the Agency by Freedom of Information
lawsuits.  A series of internal memos dated 1976, made repeated
references to "UFO Research"- "UFO Studies"- "CIA-UFO Experts"-and
"Agency personnel who are monitoring the UFO phenomenon."  The
reluctance to admit an interest in UFOs dates back to at least 1952,
an internal letter from CIA Weapons Chief states "It is strongly urged
that no indication of CIA interest reach the press or public, in light
of their alarmist tendencies."

     Officially, CIA and other government agencies say their lack of
interest is because UFOs pose no threat to national security.  Yet,
UFOs have made alarming intrusions at our most sensitive military
bases.  As the Washington Post reported, "UFOs visited five separate
nuclear missile launch sites near the Canadian border during a two-
week period in 1975, one right after the other."  In a least one case,
UFOs tampered with the launch codes of ICBM missiles.  Fighter planes
were unable to catch the UFOs, which makes the government explanation
that those UFOs were "mystery helicopters" seem specious.  Mystery
helicopters that can out-race F-16's visiting nuclear missile bases?
If this isn't national security, what is??  Oddly, the government has
used the national security excuse to withhold UFO data.  Stan Friedman
fought all the way to the Supreme Court to get UFO documents from the
National Security Agency, and all he got was a summary of the
documents which was over 80% blacked out.

This "explaining away" real UFO cases continues to this day with the
multiple phony accounts of the Roswell extraterrestrial crash given by
the Air Force.  Within the span of a single day (July 8, 1947), two
stories were made public: the first one, the correct story as it turns
out, was that a flying disc had been recovered.  A few hours later
General Ramey issued a statement that the wreckage was just that of a
weather balloon's radar reflector.  27 years after that in 1993, in
response to the potentially damaging GAO Roswell report, the Air Force
released its now infamous super-secret Project Mogul balloon excuse.
This is the most popular excuse favored by UFO debunkers. Four years
after that in 1997, came the now laughable time-compressed crash-test
dummy explanation which tried to explain the 4 to 5 alien bodies that
were witnessed at the crash site by multiple military and civilian
observers.