Re: Debunkers are Delusional// Debunkers are a maniacal mix of misfits (PROOF!)

On Jul 22, 11:45�am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:a4288972-bb4f-40b1-a5a7-e4e5bd1ff8ff@q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:18 am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:dd94f80b-39a9-42be-9099-10035ef93029@l5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 6:45 am, "H." <hbo...@charter.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:51c12e75-ffcb-44a1-85b0-b6544bb3b2c4@m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 19, 12:01 pm, "H." <hbo...@charter.net>
wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A."<scie...@zzz.com> wrote in message

news:ca220248-d8a0-42b4-a9d0-c56a7b2748a3@o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 10:31 am, Cujo DeSockpuppet

<c...@petitmorte.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
<scie...@zzz.com> wrote
innews:b823a1de-31e1-4d40-852a-d6ac24acffd9@26g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:

On Jul 17, 1:29 am, Cujo DeSockpuppet
<c...@petitmorte.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
<scie...@zzz.com> wrote
innews:7

db85eb7-6456-462f-a902-c0d6b82a7...@i8g2000pro.googlegroups.com:

On Jul 16, 1:17 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet
<c...@petitmorte.net> wrote:

"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
<scie...@zzz.com> wrote
innews:4

b6f0af1-608d-4a24-bad9-7f1194868...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com:

Debunkers are DelusionalDebunkers are
Delusional
dic...@prodigy.net wrote

You're using Flyspecks as a reference?
Nigga,
puh-leeeeez!

Just like a debunker to deny the PROOF!!!

Let's see if I've got this straight, a kook
who
uses multiple
sockpuppets clumsily[1] cites the baseless
assertions of someone even
kookier and that's proof?

I may have to revise my opinion of your
kookiness
but you can't get
any fucking dumber.

Apparently you have been misled, once again!
Your
opinions do not
COUNT, debunkers are now officially listed as
SUB-HUMANS. Please
remove yourself and your ilk from these
newsgroups.

Make me.

This order cannot be rescinded.

Or enforced, you powerless wimp.

I am shocked that you disobeyed a direct order
from
no
less than the
General himself. I pray you to reconsider before
he
comes back from
his vacation. I know now you will follow the
order
to
turn yourself
over to the nearest FEMA Death Camp.

Now that you have taken up debunking, get in line
you
ignorant klutz.

We've been over this material #1) you are NOT
funny,
never have been,
never will be.
#2) your ability to debunk the reality of off-world
races on THIS
ISLAND EARTH has been an utter failure.

I noticed that you did not deny the debunking
charge
or
being an ignorant klutz.
H.

As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.
These newsgroups
are about the REALITY of extraterrestrials, and the
intelligence
agencies/Pentagon/aerospace firms ability to deal
with
that. Since
you were an ex-member of one of those, you ability to
debunk the FACT
of ET visitation, abductions, implants,
back-engineering of alien

screed deleted <<<<<

Of course you have no idea. You have no idea about
anything.
I have debunked visitation, abductions, implants and
back-engineering 2000% better than you have debunked
the moon landing.
BTW You are still an ignorant Klutz.


You couldn't debunk the Easter Bunny if the world
depended on it. �For
a spOOk, you are pretty much worthless, as a human, the
same
conclusion applies.

Old Worn Out Bullshit Deleted <<<<<


Goodbye you worthless ignorant klutz. �You are not
worth the trouble to try to use sensible conclusions
on.
So you win. � Have a great time in your total ignorance
you ex_spOOk.
H.

Oh BTW �PLONK


Don't go away mad, just go away, and take the rest of your worthless
debunkers and spOOks with you.  Simply put, your kind is not welcome
here with civilized, normal people.  Also, these groups are about the
reality of the ET presence, not some lame debunker excuses: weather
baloons, stealth blimps and time-compressed crash-test dummies.  Have
fun at the FEMA camp!!

Obama: More Polished Than the Last Puppet By Cindy Sheehan

Okay, so the United States of America has had a new puppet regime for
six months now. I was never so much into giving Obama a �chance� and I
think it�s way past time to call Obama and his supporters out, like we
called Bush and his supporters out. Our Presidents are merely puppets
for the Robber Class and Obama is no exception. I am observing very
little �change� in actual policy, or even rhetoric from an Obama
regime. Granted, his style and delivery are more polished than the
last puppet, but especially in foreign policy, little has changed.
Evidently we elect Presidents based on empty rhetoric and if we can
find someone who can say very little using many words, that�s better.
I knew a year ago when Obama and his ilk were blathering on about
�change� that they didn�t mean positive �change� for us, but it�s a
shame Obama�s voters didn�t ask him to be a little more specific or
demand some good �change.�

Besides foreign policy where he is a complete disaster, it appears
Obama�s jobs program is little more than adding tens of thousands of
troops to an already bloated military, instead of bringing troops home
from anywhere. Billions will go to the money trap of the Pentagon to
invest in recruiting, where the budgets of peace groups who do counter
recruitment are tanking. This is the 3rd week in July and already it�s
the deadliest month for US and coalition troops deaths in Af/Pak. Who
would ever have thought when violence is surged, then deaths would
surge, also? I think I�ve seen this movie before.  The blueprint for
this disastrous administration came early when O appointed nothing but
neocons to his foreign policy team. The Secretary of State and the
National Security advisor have even both admitted that the Council on
Foreign Relations/Henry Kissinger are calling the shots.

Sec. Clinton at a speech at the new HQ for the Council on Foreign
Relations: I have been often to, I guess, the mother ship in New York
City, but it�s good to have an outpost of the Council right here down
the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the
Council (Council of Foreign Relations), so this will mean I won�t have
as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should
think about the future.

National Security Advisor, James Jones, who also VERY coincidentally,
I�m sure, was on the boards of directors of Chevron and Boeing, had
this to say earlier this year: As the most recent National Security
Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr.
Kissinger. Jones was also giving a speech to the Council on Foreign
relations at the time. Kissinger is a fabulous role model for war,
don�t you think. How many deaths will Kissinger be forced to atone for
when he goes to the same place as McNamara? Wherever prosperous war
criminals go to when they die? As an early, ardent and unapologetic
supporter of the Bush Pre-emptive Wars of Aggression Doctrine, Sec.
Clinton showed her true colors early on in her tenure as an elected
official and, of course, Jones is a war profiteer. Added to this mix
is George Bush�s SecDef, Robert Gates, and these are just the main
players. Contrary to his �promise� Obama has appointed former
lobbyists to key positions in the Pentagon.

We all know all of these things, but the more things �change� the more
they stay the same. Apparently the OBots are co-opting the excuses of
the BushBots to justify their savior�s surge in Afghanistan and
Pakistan and broken promise after broken promise in Iraq.

The other day Howard Dean, on DemocracyNow!, told Amy Goodman that
although Iraq was bad, we need to stay in Afghanistan because, first
and foremost, for the women: And if we leave, women will experience
the most extraordinary depredations of any population on the face of
the earth. I think we have some obligation to try and see if we can
make this work, not just for America and our security interests, but
for the sake of women in Afghanistan and all around the globe. Is this
acceptable to treat women like this? I think not.

Laura Bush earlier this year:  �There�s still a risk to women in
Afghanistan. I hope the people of the United States will stay
committed. We don�t want to see Afghanistan go back to what it was
before.�

I have been on my Myth America Book Tour for three months now and
almost everywhere I go, an older white male will stand up and say:
�Cindy, we really need to stop allowing Iraq to distract us.
Afghanistan always was the place we needed to focus our attentions!�
And besides the other neocon reasons given for why US troops need to
decimate that country further and kill more innocent women and
children is: you guessed it: For the women! So, we are literally
sending in the cavalry to rescue the poor women of Afghanistan, and
the patriarchal state apparatus and its zombie adherents don�t care
how many women we have to kill to save them. Disgusting.

I give Obama an �F� for his first six months. There has been nothing
to like from his continuing the Bush failed economic policies to
excluding single-payer advocates from the table. Not to mention
reinforcing and protecting Bush Crimes. The good news is: He�s got
plenty of room for improvement!
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article23121.htm