On Sep 8, 4:11 pm, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 7, 2:40 am, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
Name my sockpuppets, Artie/Gary/Frager. You should have plenty of
experience knowing how sockpuppets operate.
Be nice, now. Kolnick/"Frager"/Fluffernutter is probably quite busy
asking *his* sockpuppets how he can "ban" you.
-Chris Krolczyk
To Chris Crack-pot; your kind are no longer wanted or needed here with
civilized, decent people. Please crawl back to your cave and inform
the members of your cult that your silly little games have come to an
end. There are nice folks at your nearest FEMA camp to give you your
regiment of seven flu shots. Please roll up your sleeve and let us
help your kooky whacky cult!!
Here is an article to "help" the cult of debunkers and their ill-bred
ilk. (Of course we mean inter-bred, but that should be obvious to
even the most casual observer!)
Victim Mentality In Abductees
Victim Mentality In Abductees: An Unacceptable Concept.
An Essay by Ann Druffel, (California), FSR Consultant
In August 1998 my most recent book, HOW TO DEFEND YOURSELF AGAINST
ALIEN ABDUCTION, was published by Three Rivers Press, a “How To”
division of Random House, followed closely by a U.K. edition in
November 1998 from Piatkus Publishers Limited. Better publishers could
not have been found - the finest editors and class-act books which
covered twenty-five years of personal research on the UFO abduction
phenomenon. For a year afterward, and continuing full speed today, the
book receives publicity on radio and TV. It has been reviewed
favourably in numerous UFO and parapsychology journals, and in
newstand magazines in the U.S. and the U.K.
In spite of the fact that the new concept presented in the book is of
supreme importance to the UFO field, certain influential UFO
researchers have remained strangely silent. This is in stark contrast
to favourable reviews by top objective researchers - Dwight Connelly
in MUFON UFO JOURNAL, Jennie Zeidman in INTERNATIONAL UFO REPORTER,
Tim Owens and Paul Norman in AUSTRALIAN UFO NEWSLETTER, Gordon
Creighton in FLYING SAUCER REVIEW among others.
During a magic 2.5 hours with Art Bell on COAST TO COAST, I fielded
intelligent questions from numerous listeners and will presently
appear on DREAMLAND with Whitley Strieber. All this demonstrates the
interest in the subject of “resisters” who successfully tell the
abduction phenomenon, whatever it is, to go away and quit bothering
them.
Many abduction researchers in various countries have sent letters of
agreement and encouragement, and my data base of “resisters” grows
rapidly as many abductees continue to share their experiences,
containing approximately 100 cases to date. Yet a few top abduction
researchers continue to ignore the new concept and message in the
book, namely, that stout-hearted witnesses and abductees can and do
fend off so-called “UFO aliens”, and even permanently rid themselves
of the visitations.
In conversation at the annual Laramie Conference last year with a well-
known author and abduction researcher, he told me that he came across
“resisters” in his case load but did not elaborate how he handled this
information. I know for a fact that other researchers come across
resisters, but these cases somehow never make it into print. Do these
particular researchers dismiss “resisters” because they don’t fit in
with their own hypotheses? If so, I feel that this attitude is
unscientific. In science, don’t we work with all data that comes to us
from rational, honest sources and not try to “screen out” what is
unacceptable to us?
Curious as to why certain researchers have been ignoring the new
concept and message in HOW TO DEFEND YOURSELF AGAINST ALIEN ABDUCTION,
I recently sent friendly letters, copies of the book and related bio/
resume/bibliographical material to four of those who had been so
silent, with a simple request for feedback and input. None of the four
responded. Their silence was so deafening that it allowed valuable
insight to seep into my brain information which seems so startling
that I feel impelled to share it with you. Namely: Certain factors in
the UFO field apparently do not want instances of successful
resistance to come out. If they ignore the book and its new concept,
will they perhaps not be tempted to try to advise their own
traumatized abductees that resistance may be possible?
Perhaps they do not believe that resistance works and so don’t want
abductees to even consider it for fear they will “fail” and emerge
doubly traumatized? Or do they perhaps sincerely believe that
experiencers have no right to resist? What other reasons would prevent
researchers from learning vital, new information about a phenomenon on
which they have laboured for decades?
All four “silent” researchers I refer to are Americans working mainly
with American abductees. I do not know if any researchers in the U.K.
share these thoughts, but practically nothing has been written in
overseas journals, either, about successful resistance. Do researchers
truly feel that the abduction phenomenon is so overpowering that it is
able to overthrow the principles of freedom on which democracies and
republics worldwide were founded - the same principles of freedom from
fear and oppression which guide our everyday lives?
Do these researchers really believe that self-determination, right of
privacy and other principles of individual freedom no longer apply? Do
they truly think that we are now in the hands (or claws) of whitish,
frail, large-eyed humanoids whose source is, at best, uncertain? What
kind of nonsense is this? I think it is “nonsense” being fed to us by
the phenomenon itself, whatever it is.
Where in the great works of history, philosophy, and theology does it
say that other orders of beings can tamper with us, guide our
destinies or are responsible for us in any way? Say what you will,
authors like Von Daniken and Sitchin are not the equivalent of Plato,
Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Muhammad, Buddha and other world thinkers,
(not to mention one other who is held to be far greater than any of
these! -G.C.).
The theories put forth by these top-profile abduction researchers are
conspicuously contradictory, but they do not seem to recognize this
among themselves. There is a “oneness” among them which is difficult
to understand. Some of them theorize (or are actually convinced) that
extraterrestrial creatures are hybridizing humans against their will
so that they can take over our planet.
Others theorize (or are convinced) that these creatures are somehow
responsible, in the great order of things, for evolving the human race
and bringing us to “higher spirituality”? These gentler thinkers do
not explain why the creatures first traumatize victims with unpleasant
interactions, then eventually lead the abductees to “love” them.
According to this theory, the creatures’ painful interference is
really “good” for the human race, and abductees should go along with
it because the creatures “know what is best for us.”!
TWO SEPARATE PHENOMENA? The data is overwhelming that unidentified,
possible extraterrestrial, craft seem to be monitoring mankind. These
demonstrably physical UFOs reported by credible witnesses constitute a
serious scientific question which has regrettably been covered up by
governments and ignored by official Science.
THE REAL “UFOs”. However, in my considered opinion, UFO phenomena can
be separated into two separate groups: Craft-like UFOs which are
caught on radar, chased by jet pilots, and sometimes photographed,
appear to be physical in our earth’s space-time, but in these cases
little or no interaction with any “occupants” is noted.
So-called “alien abductions”, on the other hand, generally take place
in altered states of consciousness and are retrieved in large part
through hypnotic regression.
Claims of “genetic manipulation”, “missing foetuses”, “implants” and
“alien-military co-operation” lack solid, scientific proof of
extraterrestrial involvement, although I concede that some so-called
“implants”, “scars” and the like might be due to the creatures’
ability to materialize temporarily into our space-time.
But the proliferation and escalation of abduction claims seem more
likely caused by (1) telepathic leakage during hypnosis between
witnesses and hypnotist/researchers; and (2) psychological deception
by the phenomenon itself.
The logical question to all this is: Why is the trauma necessary? If
these creatures are really “in charge of us” why don’t they approach
us with kind logic from the beginning?
Another logical question: As an American, I have to ask: Whatever
happened to our individual rights of self-determination and liberty?
The same question can be logically asked by citizens of many other
countries. To me, both theories in the UFO field outlined above
consider these creatures to be “in charge of us”.
This idea contradicts the principles of freedom of the individual. It
flies in the face of the American “Declaration of Independence”, the
English “Magna Carta”, the French Revolution and every other instance
in which a nation of free-thinking peoples have emerged from rag-tag
armies of revolutionaries or serfs.
If any reader thinks I am emphasizing “human rights” too much,
consider this: Police detectives who investigate horrible cases of
rape, for example, do not think of our “inalienable rights.” They are
simply outraged by the immoral act that has been perpetrated upon the
victims.
Alien abduction scenarios are basically the same as rape and other
criminal attacks. The fact that they take place in an altered state of
consciousness does not matter here. Abduction scenarios are very real
to the experiencers; they constitute a type of altered reality, the
effects of which extends into their physical lives.
The nine resistance techniques described in HOW TO DEFEND YOURSELF_
enable traumatized experiencers to break the altered state of
consciousness in which abduction scenarios occur. Once the altered
state is broken and the person returns to full waking consciousness,
the creatures vanish and the scenario ends.
My book gives multiple examples of actual documented case studies
which illustrate in detail the way in which the techniques are used
successfully, and it also describes the psychological concepts and
personality traits which seem to be involved in successful resistance.
I might gratefully add that Dr. Edgar J. Mitchell, U.S. astronaut and
sixth man to walk on the Moon, endorses my book on the cover thus:
“This is a very powerful book because it shows the deep psychological
component of the UFO experience. Druffels’ research does us all a
great service.” As the founder of the Institute of Noetic Sciences and
author of THE WAY OF THE EXPLORER, Dr. Mitchell’s statement was
gratefully received.
THE JINNS, SIDHE, FAIRIES, ELEMENTALS, etc. HOW TO DEFEND YOURSELF
AGAINST ALIEN ABDUCTION also presents a working hypothesis to explain
why resistance techniques work so well against entities which present
themselves as technologically superior extra-extraterrestrials. The
hypothesis is this: Abductees are possibly interacting with
interdimensional beings which have been described in philosophical,
historical and regligious writings, and in folklore and legend, from
every major culture of the world and in minor cultures as well.
These beings reportedly delight in harrassing and deceiving human
beings, often in a sexual manner. Specific examples are the “jinns”
described in the Koran, the Celtic “Sidhe” or “faery folk”, the
“incubi” of Europe, the “Old Hag” in Newfoundland and the “elementals”
in Buddhist cultures.
They are also known by many other names in many different languages.
They are described in Malaysia and Indonesia, in Iceland, by the
aboriginals of Australia and by various Native American tribes.
Because these beings reportedly have the ability to shapeshift, it is
surmised that they have now taken on a form which would logically
frighten even modern, technically-advanced human beings.
The creatures reported in folklore and legends, *as well as in present-
day accounts*, have at least eight characteristics in common with our
so-called “UFO alien abductors”. All of them reportedly:-
1. Materialize and de-materialize;
2. Harass human beings, frequently in a sexual manner;
3. Reportedly “steal” human babies and/or unborn foetuses;
4. Distort the witnesses’ perception of time;
5. Pass through solid matter;
6. Enter temporarily into Earth space-time, sometimes leaving physical
traces;
7. Shape-shift into various forms and sizes including, at times,
animals;
8. Exist normally on what is described as a “hidden plane” which co-
exists alongside our normal earthly space-time.
All these world cultures have developed means to resist these
creatures, and many of their techniques are similar to the techniques
used by the seventy-two (72) resisters described in my book. So why
shouldn’t abductees in modern cultures be able to fend them off as
well? The answer? -They can, and they do.
It is crucial that adequate attention be given to the concept of
successful resistance. “Resisters” are able to live happy, productive
lives, free of the trauma and other negative effects caused by their
prior experiences.
The concept of resistance is spreading: Several research sources are
speaking about it on the Internet, and letters from a few researchers
who have begun to teach resistance techniques to abductees are passing
over my desk. I would hope that a continuing dialogue on the subject
will be started in FLYING SAUCER REVIEW to counteract the silence of
the few colleagues aforementioned.
HOW TO DEFEND YOURSELF AGAINST ALIEN ABDUCTION gives detailed case
examples and practical pointers to persons experiencing abduction
trauma and lets them know that they are not helpless victims. Free
people around the world should not have to feel that they are victims
of anyone or anything.
Human beings are neither: (1) victims being taken over against their
will; nor (2) frail creatures who need help in being evolved.
Human beings everywhere can, with bold assurance, fight against
anything we need to fight against, and win!
--
Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA)