NOTE: If some sections of this are too wide for your screen, please
click on Forward and hopefully that will correct them. -- kl,
pp Government of the USA in Exile Free Americans Reaching Out to
Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free Via
<p...@usa-exile.org<mailto:p...@usa-exile.org>> September 10, 2009
Dear Friends and Colleagues, Well, here we are now eight years into
this horrendous historical period engendered by the US-engineered
9/11 attacks.
The 9/11 Truth Movement is still growing--especially outside the
US. For example, please see below how effectively The 9/11 Hard
Evidence Tour [<thehardevidence.com>] is reaching mainstream
Australians.
Because the US Left/Liberal/Progressive Establishment has played
such a crucial role in the Bush-Obama Junta's assiduous 9/11 cover-up,
it is rapidly gaining a laughingstock reputation among its counterparts
in other nations. I suspect that by now Polish intellectuals are
circulating a series of How-Many-Noam-Chumpskies-Does-It-Take-To
jokes. Why I myself am curious how many Noam Chumpskies it takes
to change a light bulb.
Probably the best way we can observe this eighth anniversary (short
of a bunch of people shutting down the US Injustice Dept till it
releases all its 9/11 insider-trading info) is to reach out to folks
who've thus far lacked the confidence necessary to look 9/11 in the
eye.
To facilitate this I've pasted below quite a bit of 9/11 entry-level
info. Perhaps the most effective site for beginners is
<patriotsquestion911.com> Yours for 9/11 Truth, Keith Lampe,
Ro-Non-So-Te, Ponderosa Pine Transition Prez
PS: Good news from NYC (see directly below)!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Frank Agamemnon <honkys...@yahoo.com<mailto:honkys...@yahoo.com>>
Date: September 11, 2009 12:16:06 AM GMT-05:00 To:
honkys...@yahoo.com<mailto:honkys...@yahoo.com> Subject: Fw: Breaking:
City Concedes 30,000
From: NYC CAN <tedwal...@nyccan.org<mailto:tedwal...@nyccan.org>>
Subject: Breaking: City Concedes 30,000 To:
honkys...@yahoo.com<mailto:honkys...@yahoo.com> Date: Thursday,
September 10, 2009, 4:23 PM
[cid:43DA879F-07ED-46A2-ADBB-C0CC9B046016@local]
NYC CAN Breaking News Bulletin - FORWARD WIDELY September 10, 2009
City of New York Concedes 9/11 Coalition Has 30,000 Valid Signatures
To Put Referendum For 9/11 Investigation on November Ballot
New York b In a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New
York have conceded that the New York City Coalition for Accountability
Now (NYC CAN), a group comprising 9/11 family members, first
responders and survivors, indeed did submit over 30,000 valid
signatures to put the referendum for a new 9/11 investigation before
the voters of New York City this November.
In an earlier letter from the City Clerk dated July 24, 2009, the
City had claimed only 26,003 signatures were valid, 3,997 short of
the requisite 30,000. The Citybs concession that over 30,000 of the
52,000 signatures submitted were in fact valid paves the way for
lawyers from both sides to argue the legality of petition.
Asked whether he thought NYC CAN could overcome the Citybs challenge
to the legality of the petition, legal counsel to the petitioners,
Dennis McMahon, said, bAbsolutely. Although the City has an incredibly
successful record of shooting down ballot initiatives, we will be
arguing from a fresh perspective that reflects the unprecedented
events of 9/11. We believe the courts will see how critical an issue
this is, and be persuaded with our legal reasoning and point of
view.b A final determination on the legality of the petition will
be reached in time for the referendum to be included on the November
ballot should the petitioners prevail.
Representatives for NYC CAN, 9/11 family member Manny Badillo and
Executive Director Ted Walter, arrived at the Board of Elections
on the morning of Wednesday, September 9, to assist the court-appointed
referee in commencing a line-by-line review of the disputed signatures,
only to learn the refereebs review had been called off due to a
last minute concession by the City. Mr. Badillo immediately got on
the phone to inform others of the news.
bThe City conceded we have 30,000 valid signatures. Big victory.b
The Citybs concession comes as a result of the immense effort put
forth by 50+ volunteers who gave more than 1,000 hours over a two
week period from August 10 to August 25 to identify a total of 7,166
signatures that were wrongly invalidated by the NYC City Clerk and
Board of Elections. On August 27, NYC CAN filed the 631-page Bill
of Particulars cataloguing each of the 7,166 signatures it contended
were in fact valid. NYC CAN submitted another 28,000 signatures on
September 4 to guarantee the referendum will go on the ballot if
they win the court case, bringing the total signatures submitted
to 80,000.
[cid:0098100E-E26C-4002-96D4-132A0B5BD578@local]
631-page Bill of Particulars Filed on August 27
NYC CAN must deliver its memorandum of law in response to the Citybs
motion for summary judgment by Monday, September 21. The City will
be given an opportunity to reply before the refereebs decision is
made on Monday September 28. Fast-track appeals will likely follow
no matter who wins. A final decision will have to be made by
September 30.
If the referendum passes in November, it would lead to the creation
of a local, independent commission with subpoena power that would
be tasked with comprehensively reinvestigating the attacks.
www.NYCCAN.org
Thinkers think and talkers talk. Patriots ACT.
===================================================================================================================================
From: Jonathan Mark <fl...@mtdata.com<mailto:fl...@mtdata.com>>
Date: September 11, 2009 7:25:20 AM GMT-05:00 To: Flyby News
<i...@flybynews.com<mailto:i...@flybynews.com>> Subject: [911TruthAction]
NYC CAN 30,000 + updated links
Flyby News -www.FlybyNews.com<http://www.flybynews.com/> Editor -
Jonathan Mark September 11, 2009 -
Note - Please take positive actions this anniversary time for an
event that must be investigated.. or we can kiss science and our
planet, and our freedoms good-bye. 9/11 Truth is key for peace and
exposing the emperor with no clothes on. Be certain to read the
breaking news with NYC CAN winning a major legal battle. The NYC
legal system conceded that a coalition of families, responders, and
citizens, presented 30,000 valid petitions from NYC voters for the
referendum vote this November 3. I will have more on the events of
September 11 in NYC in a forthcoming FN issue. Meanwhile, note,
too, the film, "Dark Legacy: George Bush and the Assassination of
JFK" will be screened by Valley 9/11 Truth in Northampton, MA on
September 23rd. This film is highly recommended for those interested
in researching the connecting dots that show WWII never really
ended; but via treason and betrayal, fascists have infiltrated
governments in the descending free world. Take good care.. thanks
for your interest in Flyby News.. hang in there.. independence and
truth are critical for peace and justice, and integrity for humankind.
CRITICAL BREAKING NEWS
For Independent Investigations NYC CAN<http://nyccan.org/index.php>
NYC Coalition for Accountability Now <http://nyccan.org/index.php>10
September 2009 City of New York Concedes 9/11 Coalition Has 30,000
Valid Signatures To Put Referendum
<http://www.911blogger.com/node/21221>For 9/11 Investigation on
November Ballot <http://www.911blogger.com/node/21221>
________________________________ When I despair, I remember that
all through history the way of truth and love has always won.
There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem
invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS.
-- Mahatma Gandhi 1869-1948, Indian Political, Spiritual Leader
________________________________ We Demand Transparency
<http://wedemandtransparency.com/>A Conference for Peace, Truth, &
New Economics New York City <> September 11 - 13, 2009
War in Space & 9/11 <http://noliesradio.org/archives/3991>Jonathan
Mark on Fair & Balanced <http://noliesradio.org/archives/3991>Kevin
Barrett - NoLiesRadio - August 11, 2009
18 August 1999 Activists Stand Their Ground as Cassini Sails Away
<http://www.flybynews.com/cgi-local/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid9353052...,>Space
for Peace and September 11
<http://www.flybynews.com/cgi-local/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1247687...,>New
York Senator Supports New 9/11 Investigation
<http://torontochange.com/index.php?option=com_mamblog&task=show&actio...>9/11
Investigation Resource Archive
<http://www.flybynews.com/cgi-local/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1014738...,>04
September 2009 Court Says 9/11 Witnesses Can Sue Ashcroft
<http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20090904215125333>05 September
2009 9/11 FEMA Videographer Blows the Whistle
<http://911blogger.com/node/21114>06 September 2009 Presidential
adviser Van Jones resigning after coming under fire for signing
9/11 Petition.
<http://911blogger.com/node/21121>RECLAIMING AMERICA
<http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_203.shtml>Paranoid
Shift<http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_203.shtml>
<http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_203.shtml>CAMPAIGNS
Valley 9/11 Truth <http://valley911truth.org/>presents a film
screening:
Dark Legacy <http://www.jfkii.com>George Bush and the Assassination
of JFK <http://www.jfkii.com>Wednesday, September 23, 2009; 7:00
PM Media Ed. Foundation, Northampton,
MA<http://www.meetup.com/valley911truth/calendar/11331262/>
"Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again.
If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger
safe haven from which Al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans."
-- President Barack Obama Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in
Phoenix (8/17/09)
<http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-vfw18-2009...>"It
is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very
important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an
inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government."
- David Ray Griffin
"We're trying to change the paradigm of human democracy, of human
governance, and thatbs what this [NYC 9/11 Ballot
Initiative<http://nyccan.org>] is all about, changing the paradigm
of human governance right here in New York City by asserting that
you saw something wrong that took place, and you want to address
it through using the tool of the Initiative, the legislative power
of citizenry to go after that fundamental change."
-- Mike Gravel Former US Senator Democracy Now! June 17,
2008<http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/17/former_senator_mike_gravel_call...>
________________________________
Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus, and has supported
critical campaigns for a healthy environment, human rights, justice,
and nonviolence, since the launch of NASAbs Cassini space probe in
1997.
=====News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era====>
= = = = =www.FlybyNews.com<http://www.flybynews.com> = = = = =
====================================================================================================================================
From: C Loverain <kisshote...@hotmail.com<mailto:kisshote...@hotmail.com>>
Date: September 10, 2009 9:05:05 PM GMT-05:00 To: 911Truth Australia
<aus911tr...@yahoogroups.com<mailto:aus911tr...@yahoogroups.com>>
Subject: "Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President Obama"
8th Anniversary, folks!
Do whatever you can to wake up more citizens, please!!
Thank you.
________________________________
[cid:18C19D27-36EF-4152-A7BF-DA82969AE0D5@local]<http://www.youtube.com/>
Watch this!!!
Charlie Sheen asking President Obama to open a new 9/11 investigation.
[cid:685A729E-B193-49DC-9D2C-2A00FD4F2281@local]<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyKR2-A0KPU&feature=email>
Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President
Obama<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyKR2-A0KPU&feature=email>
TheAlexJonesChannel<http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel> 10
September 2009http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyKR2-A0KPU
http://www.infowars.com/twenty-minutes-with-the-president/
Charlie Sheen addresses the President about 9/11 in a special video
message, shortly after releasing his "20 Minutes with the President,"
specifically addressing 20 key points that need to be answered by
a truly independent investigation.
Sheen's message is a call to action, not only for President Obama
to address the pertinent issues, but for activists everywhere to
pressure their representatives and leaders, wherever they may be,
to 'be on the right side of history' and take back the country
through peaceful revolution and true grassroots dissent.
READ MORE:
Twenty Minutes with the President -http://www.infowars.com/twenty-minutes-with-the-president/
Charlie Sheen Requests Meeting With Obama Over 9/11 Cover-Up -http://www.infowars.com/charlie-sheen-requests-meeting-with-obama-ove...
=======================================================================================================================================
Audio: The Truth behind 9/11 GRNH, David Ray Griffin Interviewed
by Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research<http://www.globalresearch.ca/>, September 10, 2009
THE GLOBAL RESEARCH NEWS HOUR ON RBN THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2009
MP3 Files: Hour
1<http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Chossudovsky/2009/09/Chossudovsky_1...>
[cid:CDC91A8E-17F6-4B58-881C-5979CC6ACF9E@local]
GUEST: David Ray Griffin is a distinguished professor of theology,
best-selling author and America's foremost analyst of 9/11 on which
he has written ten book, exposing in detail the lies underlying the
official narrative. In this program, which coincides with the
commemoration of the tragic events of September, 11 2001. David Ray
Griffin will provide a review of 9/11 issues, unanswered questions
and implications.
Jacques Marcille of Montreal 911 Truth will also be providing
insights on 911 Truth and media disinformation.
HOST: Michel Chossudovsky
click to download (58 Minutes)
MP3 Files: Hour
1<http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Chossudovsky/2009/09/Chossudovsky_1...>
=================================================================================================================================
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23460.htm
Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond
By Alan Sabrosky
September 10, 2009 "Information Clearing
House<http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/>' -- The attacks
on September 11, 2001 have been a defining moment for America. The
political and psychological impact on Americans of a concerted and
visible attack in America was enormous -- indeed, it is an interesting
"coincidence" that the attacks occurred on the one day of the year
whose mention reinforces a public sense here of danger and emergency:
9-1-1.
A significant development in the 1990s was the formation of the
neo-conservative think tank known as PNAC (Project for a New American
Century), whose members prepared position papers for the Israeli
government and for a future US Administration sharing their views.
That happened in 2000 with the election of George W. Bush, and a
contemporary writer summarized the tip of the neo-conservative
iceberg in his first Administration this way:
The "outsiders" from PNAC were now powerful "insiders," placed in
important positions from which they could exert maximum pressure
on US policyb&PNAC had a lock on military policy-creation in the
Bush Administration.
Especially significant in terms of subsequent events was the
acknowledgement in one of PNAC's own documents that their program
for America (and Israel) would not readily be accepted by the
American people. What this meant, PNAC opined in 2000, was that
"the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary
change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and
catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor."
9/11 Reconsidered
On September 11, 2001, the PNAC people in and out of government --
and by extension AIPAC and Israel -- "coincidentally" got the event
they needed, barely eight months after coming into office. Most
people are familiar with the basic details of that day -- two
commercial aircraft crashing into the two tallest buildings in New
York City's World Trade Center (WTC), a third striking the Pentagon,
and a fourth ending up in a Pennsylvania field. Few people will
forget the images of the burning buildings, their collapse, the
casualties, and the sense of shock and tragedy that ensued.
The official 9/11 Commission's work and report were at best an
incomplete exercise. Many people dismiss the findings of the
Commission, and that includes its co-chairs. Many others who utterly
distrust the 9/11 Commission report, dismiss the US Governmentbs
explanation of it, and point to both an official cover-up and an
binside job,b include veteran fighter pilots, EMTs (Emergency Medical
Technicians), air defense experts, experienced commercial pilots,
demolition experts, architects and civil engineers b none of them
professions that inherently attract and retain the gullible and
credulous.
Several things are very clear to me from a careful assessment of
both official and critical evaluations of the 9/11 attacks. First,
the striking aircraft alone simply could not have brought down
either of the two buildings in the manner in which they fell, much
less a third building which was not hit by a plane (I expect the
one intended to do that as a "cover" had ended up in that Pennsylvania
field), given the available physical evidence and a wealth of expert
testimony. This means the attackers had assistance on the ground,
and it had to have been active before the attacks occurred: preparing
buildings for controlled demolition is not something done haphazardly
in the midst of chaos.
Second, only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets,
access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on
the ground: our CIA and Israel's Mossad. Only one had the incentive,
using the bwho benefitsb principle: Mossad. And that incentive
dovetailed perfectly with the neo-conbs agenda and explicitly
expressed need for a catalytic event to mobilize the American public
for their wars, using American military power to destroy Israelbs
enemies. Only the unexpected strength of the Iraqi resistance kept
Syria and Iran from being attacked in the second Bush Administration.
Thus, the evidential trail for 9/11 and the wars in Afghanistan &
Iraq run from PNAC, AIPAC and their cohorts; through the mostly
Jewish neo-cons in the Bush Administration; and back to the Israeli
government. None of the denials and political machinations can alter
that essential reality. Terms such as treason, betrayal and deceit
do not overstate the case against them.
Finally, we need to take a hard look at why the mainstream media
(MSM) have paid more attention to Sarah Palinbs wardrobe than they
have to dissecting blatant falsehoods, discrepancies and inconsistencies
in the US Governmentbs treatment of 9/11 and its aftermath. And the
reason is that on this issue, all are on the same side, and the
official line is the one they all prefer b ballb meaning the PNAC
alumni who took over the Bush Administrationbs national security
apparatus and their counterparts in the Obama administration, AIPAC
and the rest of the numerous Jewish PACs, the MSM owners and Israel.
The depiction of the media management in America in 2002 is especially
informative, and has not changed significantly since then:
CEOs and Directors of companies change as often as Boards of Directors
vote. But if we could bfreeze frameb the CEOs of the largest US
Media companies in mid 2002, we would find that ten Jewish American
men ran the vast majority of US television networks and other media
companies including movies, radio, and publishing at that time. Not
much has changed today.
Looking Ahead
Today we are getting the same line on Iran, from the same type of
people -- Obama himself tries to be more independent, but most of
the key staff and national security people in his Administration
do not differ greatly on Israel and the Middle East from those of
his predecessor. And the Congress has shown itself to be even more
of AIPAC's lap-dog than the preceding Congress, an exercise in
self-serving cowardice that admittedly has taken some doing.
But AIPAC and company are riding a tiger in America, and if they
ever slip, the resulting convulsion will be catastrophic for them
and for Israel. The open unfolding of the 9/11 tragedy and its
ensuing wars that is now occurring can be that slip. The human cost
to America to date is some 60,000 people, military and civilian,
killed or wounded on 9/11 and in Iraq and Afghanistan together,
with more to come once we go to war with Iran (or get dragged into
it following an Israeli attack on Iran). Much of the deliberately
misdirected rage that followed 9/11 has given way to endurance and
grief.
But grief is a close cousin to rage, and an enraged America is not
pretty, as anyone familiar with our history can appreciate. Americans
are often deceptive without meaning to be. To much of the world,
they often come across as naive, bumbling innocents in the world
of global politics. And on a day-to-day basis, there is much truth
to that.
But an enraged America is a very different character. You have only
to look at what happened in WWII to German and Japanese cities,
towns and villages, where America slaughtered literally millions
of German and Japanese civilians -- most of them women and children
-- knew it was doing it, and cared nothing at all. The goal was to
crush, and restraint was not a word used much at all.
If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just
how much of their suffering -- and the suffering we have inflicted
on others -- is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its
advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the
press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this
about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking
like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israelbs
own great fault.
Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine
Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. He can be
contacted at docbr...@comcast.net<mailto:docbr...@comcast.net>
===================================================================================================================================
From: Christopher Bollyn
<bollyn.bo...@yahoo.com<mailto:bollyn.bo...@yahoo.com>> Date:
September 10, 2009 6:12:29 AM GMT-05:00 To: RALPH OMHOLT
<skydrif...@comcast.net<mailto:skydrif...@comcast.net>>,
jfet...@d.umn.edu<mailto:jfet...@d.umn.edu> Subject: We Are Not
Afraid
Dear Ralph and other readers,
I am pleased to let you know that my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception
that Changed the World<http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book>,
can be read and printed from my websitewww.bollyn.com<http://www.bollyn.com/>..
The direct link to the book is:http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book
The best way to print the chapters is to access them through the
links in blue text in the Table of Contents. Each chapter has a
print friendly icon in the top right corner.
On Labor Day, I wrote a preface for my
book<http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book>, entitled "We Are
Not Afraid." It is essential for Americans and Europeans to shake
off the deceptions and irrational fears that prevent us from taking
constructive political action to straighten out the ship of state.
Nobody can do anything if they give in to fear.
"We Are Not Afraid" is at the top of my website at:http://www.bollyn.com/home#article_11425
With many thanks and all the best wishes,
Christopher Bollynwww.bollyn.com<http://www.bollyn.com>
We Are Not Afraid September 7, 2009
We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant
facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values.
For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and
falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.
- President John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962
"If we act like cowards we will be treated like cowards."
- Dr. Steven E. Jones, discoverer of super-thermite in dust from
the pulverized World Trade Center
Eight years have passed since the terror atrocities of September
11, 2001, heinous false-flag terror crimes which took the lives of
thousands of innocent people and led to drastic changes in the
United States and around the world. Although the terror attacks
have yet to be properly investigated and prosecuted by the federal
government, we now have scientific evidence that proves that the
official explanation is nothing but a pack of lies, a massive
deception foisted on the public by corrupt government officials and
the controlled media. Most significantly, this deception was
promoted by officials and media owners who knew it to be false.
The U.S. Department of Justice, for example, oversaw the destruction
of many tons of structural steel - crucial evidence from the crime
scenes.
On one hand, the government and media have intentionally pushed a
fabrication that a band of Islamic terrorists hijacked airplanes
and flew them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, causing
the complete destruction and pulverization of two 110-story towers
and a 47-story building in lower Manhattan. Using this deception,
the federal government and its agents have created a police state
in the United States and forced Americans and other Western nations
to participate in an utterly fraudulent "War on Terror," waging
illegal wars of aggression and occupation in the Middle East, Central
Asia, and Africa. Untold thousands have died in these illegal wars
of aggression.
On the other hand, we have scientific evidence that the Twin Towers
were blown up with an advanced form of super-thermite, chips of
which were found in five different samples of the dust from the
demolished towers by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University.
This crucial discovery, published as a peer-reviewed paper in March
2009 with other scientists, completely disproves the official version
that the Twin Towers fell as a result of fires caused by the plane
crashes. This discovery also explains the explosive destruction
and pulverization of the immense steel-frame and concrete buildings.
As Professor Jones says, "The data doesn't lie."
Rather than addressing the evidence that the World Trade Center was
demolished with explosives, however, the new administration of
President Barack Obama continues to use the 9-11 deception to
increase the war effort in Afghanistan, occupying a nation that had
nothing to do with the terror attacks in the United States. Neither
Osama Bin Laden nor the Taliban had anything to do with the demolition
of the World Trade Center, which the evidence proves was carried
out using an advanced form of Thermite created using nano-technology.
Nor did the airplane crashes themselves cause the towers to collapse.
The plane crashes were merely part of the deception, meant to provide
a plausible explanation for the pre-planned explosive demolitions
that followed.
This is why 2009 is such a crucial year for 9-11 truth. A modern
republic like the United States cannot continue for very long as a
free nation with a government and media that lie to the people about
the murder of thousands of its citizens and illegal wars supposedly
waged on their behalf. This is clearly a state in the process of
a revolutionary change. The American people will not tolerate a
police state using such outrageous lies to rob them of their money
and freedom.
"We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant
facts," President John F. Kennedy said in 1962. "For a nation that
is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an
open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." So, who is
really afraid of unpleasant facts and the truth of 9-11? It is not
the people, but the culprits of the terror atrocity and the subsequent
cover-up who fear the truth.
My work provides some of the unpleasant but essential facts about
9-11. It represents eight years of work and is dedicated to the
truth and the people who died on that day. It is unacceptable that
their deaths, and the suffering of their families, have been exploited
to deceive the world and wage illegal wars.
Christopher Bollyn Labor Day, 2009
This is the preface to the author's online book, Solving 9-11: The
Deception that Changed the
World<http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book>.
====================================================================================================================================
http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html
[cid:F63D79E7-18CE-46A2-8A1E-ADE055084598@local]
Click one of the following boxes to select a section
200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and
Government Officials<http://patriotsquestion911.com/>
700+ Engineers and
Architects<http://patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html>
200+ Pilots and Aviation
Professionals<http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html>
400+ Professors Question
9/11<http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html>
230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media
Professionals<http://patriotsquestion911.com/media.html>
LINKS<http://patriotsquestion911.com/#Links>
Recent Additions to This Page (Please also check the other five
pages.)
Jose Sanchez
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#JSanchez>Maintenance worker
World Trade Center, 14 years experience Added November 12, 2008
Valerie Lucznikowska
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#VLucznikowska>Aunt
of Adam P. Arias, Euro Brokers WTC, South Tower, 84th floor Added
November 11, 2008
Sandy Dahl <http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#SDahl>Wife
of Jason Dahl, Pilot United Airlines Flight 93 Added November 11,
2008
JoAnn and Tom Meehan
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#JTMeehan>Parents of
Colleen Ann Barkow Cantor Fitzgerald WTC, North Tower, 105th floor
Added November 11, 2008
Ephraim Resnick, B EE, PE
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#EResnick>WTC survivor
Neighborhood resident and Retired Licensed Professional Engineer
Added October 7, 2008
Deputy Chief Raymond Downey
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Downey>WTC victim
Special Operations Command, FDNY Added June 6, 2008
Father John Delendick
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Delendick>WTC survivor
Chaplain, FDNY Added June 6, 2008
Bob Pugh <http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Pugh>Pentagon
eyewitness Freelance photographer Added June 5, 2008
Jamie McIntyre
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#McIntyre>Pentagon
eyewitness CNN Senior Pentagon Correspondent Added June 5, 2008
Father Lawrence Lucas
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#LLucas>Deputy Director,
Ministerial Services NYC Corrections Department Added June 5, 2008
Jeff Birnbaum <http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Birnbaum>WTC
Survivor President of Broadway Electric Supply Added May 30, 2008
Evalle Sweezer <http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Sweezer>WTC
Survivor Office Worker. WTC North Tower Added May 30, 2008
Michelle Scott <http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#MScott>WTC
Survivor Office Worker. WTC North Tower Added May 30, 2008
Salvatore Giambanco
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#Giambanco>WTC Survivor
Maintenance Employee, World Trade Center Added May 30, 2008
Felipe David <http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#FDavid>WTC
Survivor Aramark Co. Employee, World Trade Center Added May 30,
2008
CREDIBLE CRITICS OF THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11
41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge
the Official Account of 9/11 b Official Account of 9/11: bTerribly
Flawed,b bLaced with Contradictions,b ba Joke,b ba Cover-upb May
18, 2009 English
PDF<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans.pdf>
English HTML<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans.html>
Danish
PDF<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans_Danish.pdf>
French
PDF<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans_French.pdf>
German
PDF<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans_German.pdf>
Greek
PDF<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans_Greek.pdf>
Norwegian
PDF<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans_Norwegian.pdf>
Polish PDF
<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans_Polish.pdf>
Swedish
PDF<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans_Swedish.pdf>
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive
Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11 b More than
800 Architects and Engineers have joined call for new investigation,
faulting official collapse reports June 17, 2009
PDF<http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_200...>
Respected Medical Professionals Launch New 9/11 Truth Group b
Announces Online Petition Calling for New Investigation Feb. 24,
2009 MS
Word<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Article%20Medical%20Professionals%20An...>
Article on
OpEdNews<http://www.opednews.com/articles/Respected-Medical-Professi-by-Alan-M...>
Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of
9/11 b Official Account of 9/11 bImpossibleb, bA Bunch of Hogwashb,
bTotal B.S.b, bLudicrousb, bA Well-Organized Cover-upb, bA White-Washed
Farceb Jan. 14, 2008 PDF
Version<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Article%20Military%20Officers%20Challe...>
Article on
OpEdNews<http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080112_twenty_five_u...>
Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account
of 9/11 b Official Account of 9/11 "Flawed", "Absurd", "Totally
Inadequate", "a Cover-up"
Jan. 5, 2008 PDF
Version<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Article%20State%20Dept%20911.pdf>
Article on
OpEdNews<http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_080104_eight_u_s__st...>
Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11
Investigation b Official Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash",
"Fatally Flawed"
Dec. 13, 2007 PDF
Version<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Article%20Federal%20Engineers%20and%20...>
Article on
OpEdNews<http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071211_seven_senior_...>
Eight Senior Republican Administration Appointees Challenge Official
Account of 9/11 b "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False"
Dec. 4, 2007 PDF
Version<http://patriotsquestion911.com/Article%20Republican%20Appointees%20Ch...>
Article on
OpEdNews<http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_071202_seven_senior_...>
9/11 Survivors and Family Members Question the 9/11 Commission
Report
An estimated 2,973 people were killed in the 9/11 attacks. The
death toll at the World Trade Center included 60 police officers
and 343 firefighters, 87 passengers aboard American Flight 11, 60
on United Flight 175, and over 2,000 occupants and neighbors of the
WTC. The death toll at the Pentagon included 125 people from the
Pentagon and 64 passengers on American Flight 77. And 44 people
lost their lives on United Flight 93.
Many 9/11 survivors and many 9/11 victim family members have expressed
significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Several even
allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11.
The public statements of many survivors contradict the Commission
Report. And the words and actions of some of the victims on that
terrible day are in conflict with the Commission Report. This page
of the website is a collection of their statements. The website
does not represent any organization and it should be made clear
that none of these individuals are affiliated with this website.
Listed below are statements by more than 230 9/11 survivors, victims
and family members that contradict or are critical of the 9/11
Commission Report. Their collective voices give credibility to the
claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed.
These individuals cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible
believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their statements are based
on their intimate familiarity with and intense study of the events
of 9/11. Their criticism of the Commission Report is not inherently
irresponsible or illogical, In fact, it is based on their desire
to honor the victims of that terrible day by finding the truth and
bringing to justice those responsible for these terrible acts.
If you are a 9/11 survivor or family member who has concerns about
the 9/11 Commission Report and would like your comment added to
this website, please contact me.
Thanks, Alan Miller alan.miller (at) PatriotsQuestion911 (dot)
com
Contact Your Local 9/11 Truth Group Listed
Here!<http://www.911truth.org/page.php?page=grassroots_contacts>
Demand a New 9/11
Investigation!<http://patriotsquestion911.com/#NewInvestigation>
WTC STAFF, OCCUPANTS, AND NEIGHBORS
[cid:1A3877BB-A6EC-435C-BA8F-E95CCD4CA1F2@local]
William Rodriguez
William Rodriguez b WTC survivor. An American Building Maintenance
employee for twenty years, responsible for inspection and maintenance
at the World Trade Center, who held the master key for the stairs.
He was the last person to leave the building on September 11 and
has been credited with saving many lives. For his efforts, he
received the National Hero Award from the Senate of Puerto Rico.
Founder, Hispanic Victims Group.
* Article 6/24/05: Regarding an explosion in the sub-basement of
the World Trade Center North Tower on 9/11, prior to any airplane
impact. "When I heard the sound of the explosion, the floor beneath
my feet vibrated, the walls started cracking and it everything
started shaking," said Rodriguez, who was huddled together with at
least 14 other people in the office. ... [Editor's note: At this
point, Mr. Rodriguez was in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower,
approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's impact point at floors
93 to 98.]
"Seconds after the first massive explosion below in the basement
still rattled the floor, I hear another explosion from way above,"
said Rodriguez. "Although I was unaware at the time, this was the
airplane hitting the tower, it occurred moments after the first
explosion."
But before Rodriguez had time to think, co-worker Felipe
David<http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#FDavid> stormed
into the basement office with severe burns on his face and arms,
screaming for help and yelling "explosion! explosion! explosion!"
David had been in front of a nearby freight elevator on sub-level
1 about 400 feet from the office when fire burst out of the elevator
shaft, causing his injuries.
"He was burned terribly," said Rodriguez. "The skin was hanging off
his hands and arms. His injuries couldn't have come from the airplane
above, but only from a massive explosion below. I donbt care what
the government says, what scientists say. I saw a man burned terribly
from a fire that was caused from an explosion below.
"I know there were explosives placed below the trade center. I
helped a man to safety who is living proof, living proof the
government story is a lie and a cover-up. ...
"I disagree 100%with the government story," said Rodriguez. "I met
with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially
discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to
bring down the north tower.
"And I contacted NIST previously four times without a response.
Finally, this week I asked them before they came up with their
conclusion that jet fuel brought down the towers, if they ever
considered my statements or the statements of any of the other
survivors who heard the explosions. They just stared at me with
blank faces and didn't have any answers."http://www.arcticbeacon<http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/28031.htm>
* Editor's note: Despite hundreds of eyewitness reports of
explosions throughout the Twin Towers by doomed victims, survivors,
emergency service personnel, reporters, and bystanders, the 9/11
Commission Report contains virtually no mention of them and entirely
ignores them in its conclusions. Graeme
MacQueen<http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html#MacQueen>'s
analysis of oral histories of 9/11 taken from 503 FDNY survivors
reveals more than 100 FDNY personnel reported explosions in the
Twin Towers.
* * Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. b& As Americans of conscience,
we ask for four things:
* An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot
Spitzer * Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
* Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
* The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry."http://www.911truth.org/article.php<http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633>
* * Signatory 11/19/04: Complaint filed with the Attorney General,
State of New York for a new independent grand jury investigation
of 9/11.
"We, the complainant signatories below, petition the Attorney General
of New York, on behalf of millions of New Yorkers who also call for
a fearless independent inquiry; for the sake of residents, workers,
and business owners in New Yorkbmost particularly in and near "Ground
Zero"; and also on behalf of other Americans who have lost employees,
friends, and family members as well as health, business, and personal
assets and civil, privacy, and other rights in the events of September
11, 2001 and their aftermath.
We approach your office as concerned citizens desiring to bring to
light the truth about the events of 9/11."http://www.justicefor911.org<http://www.justicefor911.org/Complainant_Signatures_111904.php>
* * Personal website:http://www.911keymaster.com/
[snip]
===========================================================================================================================================
From: Paul Krassner
<paulkrass...@roadrunner.com<mailto:paulkrass...@roadrunner.com>>
Date: September 9, 2009 10:44:22 PM GMT-05:00 Subject: Fwd: 9-11
From: "Jay Levin" <jayle...@roadrunner.com<mailto:jayle...@roadrunner.com>>
Date: September 9, 2009 5:09:43 PM PDT Subject: 9-11
here is the article that ran today in silicon valley metrohttp://www.metroactive.com/metro/09.09.09/cover-0936.html
the santa babara piece has mostly the same good stuff with a local
punt and some couple other grafs in and out. will send it next week
when it runs.
cheers
jay Explosive Theory
Eight years after 9/11, a growing organization of building trades
professionals suspect
that there was more to the event than the government will admit
By Jay Levin and Tom McKenzie
JUST A FEW YEARS ago Ed Munyak, a fire protection engineer for the
city of San Jose, seemed like a lonely, out-there figure, a
sometimes-target because of his outspoken position on the events
of Sept. 11, 2001. These days, hundreds of other building trade
professionals have joined him in challenging the official narrative
about the collapse of three buildings at New York's World Trade
Center (WTC) on that fateful, traumatic day.
Munyak, of Los Altos Hills, is a mechanical and fire engineer whose
job is to review building plans to ensure they comply with the
California Building and Fire Code. In 2007, after speaking out on
his own for a few years, Munyak signed on with a then-fledging
organization called Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth (AE911
Truth), founded by Bay Area architect Richard Gage.
Today, far from being isolated, Munyak now counts as allies 804
professional architects and building engineers from around the
country. Collectively, they have joined Munyak's call for an
independent technical investigation of the causes of the WTC buildings
collapse. In doing so, they reject the federal government's conclusions
that two airplanes alone brought the buildings downbwithout the aid
of pre-planted explosives.
Munyak and his fellow AE911 supporters recently received acknowledgement
from the FBI's counterterrorism division, which concluded that the
organization's core evidence deservesband will getbFBI scrutiny.
In a letter, Deputy Director Michael J. Heimbach assessed AE911's
presentation as "backed by thorough research and analysis."
Munyak and his professional allies insist that they are not conspiracy
theorists, and they refuse to speculate on the "why" or "who" of
9/11. Munyak described their basic position in an interview with
Metro.
"Buildings do not fail from fire related causes in the way that
World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7 failed. Steel frame or composite steel
buildings, modern high-rise buildingsbthey just do not collapse
catastrophically like that. It's impossible.
"Only if you sever columns in some other way will those buildings
collapse. It takes too much energy, and that energy was not there
even with adding in all that jet fuel. It defies all engineering
analysis and theory that those buildings collapsed in that manner.
It just doesn't make any sense."
Apparently reinforcing this position, a team of three scientists
working at technical laboratories in the United States and Denmark
reported in April that analysis of dust that they say was gathered
at the World Trade Center found evidence of the potent incendiary/explosive
"super thermite," used by the military.
The re-investigation movement received attention this week after
it percolated into the high ranks of the Obama administration.
The President's green jobs advisor, Van Jones, resigned on Sept. 5
amidst a controversy over his statements about Republicans and his
endorsement of a 2004 statement by the group 9/11 Truth.org, when
he was head of an Oakland non-profit organization.
The letter, signed by more than 100 official-version doubters,
called for "immediate public attention to unanswered questions that
suggest that people within the [Bush] administration may indeed
have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for
war."
[cid:1BBFD37C-E11A-4F37-9998-0E9901976BE3@local]
BLOWN THEORY: 9/11 Truthers point to photographs and videotape as
evidence that explosives were used to destroy the twin towers.
Patriotic Duty
San Jose architect Thomas Lyman Chamberlain, another member of AE911
Truth, calls the official account of the 9/11 events "a fraud."
"In light of the human life and liberties being taken based on that
fraud," Lyman wrote on the AE911.org site, building industry
professionals "have a patriotic duty to invoke their credentials
on behalf of the victims and the integrity of our nation."
Chemical engineer T. Mark Hightower of San Jose, a member of the
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and of the
American Institute of Chemical Engineers, agrees. "It is clear that
the buildings had help to bring them down," he says.
AE911 Truth has grown rapidly, igniting a struggling grassroots
movement of hundreds of other "9/11 Truth" organizations, and
spearheading a growing assault on the official story. In recent
years, other single-profession 9/11 Truth groups have launched or
gained momentum, including those comprised of airline pilots,
firefighters, veterans, medical professionals, scholars, lawyers,
religious leaders and former government employees.
Also individually calling for a new inquiry are two dozen retired
U.S. military brass and eight former U.S. State Department officials,
along with a number of Republicans who have served in high federal
positions since President Reagan, including former Assistant Treasury
Secretary Paul Craig Roberts and former Reagan administration
Assistant Defense Secretary (and retired Marine Corps colonel)
Ronald D. Ray.
Activists around the country attribute AE911's professional credibility
and its unwavering focus on the WTC as the fuel that has galvanized
the movement. David Ray Griffin, the retired Santa Barbara philosophy
professor and theologian who is perhaps the leading intellectual
force within the Truth groupsbwith seven 9/11 books to his credit,
including The New Pearl Harborbnotes that it "is possible many of
these organizations wouldn't even have formed without AE911 first
being there."
"AE911 represents the biggest boost yet to the credibility of the
9/11 truth movement," Griffin says. "It is clear there are far more
architects and engineers who have spoken out against the official
story than have publicly supported it."
[cid:A8A7DD0D-FA8E-4638-B364-710ACA882774@local]
FALLOUT: The government's theory about what destroyed WTC Building
7, which was not hit by a plane, does not satisfy members of AE911
Truth.
Building a Case
The local members of AE911 Truth and their allies elsewhere make
these arguments:
b" Crucial elements of the key government study on the step-by-step
events that occurred in the collapse of the WTC buildings don't
stand up to analytical scrutiny. The study was undertaken by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the U.S.
Commerce Department agency responsible for building and other safety
codes and standards.
b" An airplane crash and subsequent fire aren't sufficient cause
to bring down the towers, not even when combined with the presumed
dislodging of fireproofing that protected the core steel beams in
the areas in which the two planes struck. (This dislodging, NIST
asserts, made the steel vulnerable to softening by fire and brought
on the collapsebthe first ever of a steel-framed building hit by
fire.)
b" NIST never tested for explosive residues despite evidence,
including many eyewitness accounts from first responders and people
who escaped the buildings, that explosives and incendiaries were
present.
b" The collapse of the three buildings resembles two different
types of controlled demolitions, and not the bending or toppling
of a heated building section that might result from a fire.
Following the collapses, NIST assembled a panel of more than 300
staff and external experts and spent three years and $20 million
on what it claims is the most exhaustive technical study ever of a
building collapse.
Released in 2005, the initial NIST report concluded that the twin
towers, which NIST agrees could not normally be brought down by
fire alone, collapsed because of a combination of factors, most
crucially the dislodging of fireproofing by the planes' impacts.
This allowed certain beams to soften sufficiently to force an inward
bending of perimeter-supporting steel beams, putting so much pressure
on the fire-weakenedband in some cases severedbcenter steel columns
(three severed in one tower and five in another out of 47 in each)
that they collapsed in the areas where the planes had struck.
NIST also stated that there was more than enough "mass plus
acceleration" of the upper stories of the twin towers as they fell
to force a collapse of the lower structure straight down at nearly
free fall speed, with each floor adding its weight and the force
of its fall to the pressures on the floors belowba theory it argues
is supported by elaborate computer models.
NIST's report on the third building to collapse, WTC7, released in
August 2008, argues that mass computer modeling of existing evidence
also fails to support an explosives theory. The report concludes
that WTC7 was brought down by seven hours of fires combined with
falling debris from the towers that weakened an entire building
section and forced the collapse of a key support column, allowing
the building to cave in on itself.
(The NIST towers report should not be confused with the 9/11
Commission Report, which came out a year earlier with a wildly
inaccurate technical analysis that not even NIST accepts.)
Poll numbers reflect varying levels of disbelief of the official
narrative. The Zogby poll in 2004 found that half of New Yorkers
thought that U.S. officials knew the terrorist plot was going to
unfold and consciously failed to act. The New York Times and CBS
News commissioned an Angus Reid Global Monitor poll in 2006 and
found that 80 percent of Americans thought President Bush was at
least hiding something regarding 9/11.
In 2006, Popular Mechanics magazine published a study debunking
critiques of NIST, most notably the assertion that explosives brought
down the Trade Center buildings. All this was before engineers,
scientists and architects began to organize and present evidence
challenging both the official narrative and Popular Mechanics'
defense of that narrative.
Puzzling Evidence
Within his 20-year career, Richard Gage counts among his accomplishments
the design of numerous fireproofed steel-framed buildings. In an
interview with Metro, Gage, 53, a lifelong Republican, described
having a moment of clarity when he first heard alternative theories
of 9/11 presented in March 2006 by David Ray Griffin. As he tells
it, he was driving to a construction meeting and crossed the talk
radio political divide that day to listen to progressive Pacifica
Radio's KPFA interviewing Griffin.
"What Griffin was saying is that the ends of these beams that were
being ejected out of the World Trade Center at 55 mph were dripping
with molten steel, and they landed more than 500 feet away," Gage
recounts. The station also played interviews recorded after 9/11,
including with firefighters who described hearing explosions and
seeing flashes of light that would support an explosives/incendiaries
theory.
Before this, Gage notes, he hadn't paid heed to the technical details
of the collapse or questioned the official story. Particularly
striking to Gage was the fact that the taped eyewitness interviews
had only in August 2005 been released to The New York Times by the
city of New York by court orderbnearly four years after 9/11.
"This was information that has been hidden by the city of New York,
and it became obvious the reason why they hid it," Gage said. "So
I began looking at it myself. The more I read, the more disturbed
I got, and I realized fairly quickly what I needed to do, and that
was to start Architects and Engineers for 9/11Truth."
As founder and executive director, the soft-spoken Gage has since
become something like a subversive Al Gore, delivering a disturbingly
inconvenient PowerPoint presentation that he maintains dissects
most of the key elements of the NIST report. Somewhat obsessed with
recruiting as many building professionals as possible, Gage left
his job and spends most of his time traveling from city to city
presenting the core forensic case to bodies of fellow experts and
to any groups that will listen.
"Most all of the architects and engineers that I present to, once
they see the graphic evidence, they are completely overwhelmed, as
I was, with the forensic-based scientific facts surrounding this
case," Gage says. He gets similar buy-in from nonprofessional groups
of all political stripes.
Like Munyak, Gage cites the fact that steel framing serves as a
heat conductor, actually cooling fires and equalizing the burden
on any one steel section. "The steel doesn't get to the temperature
that would cause it to weaken," he says. "No steel-framed high rise
has ever collapsed due to fire, and we have almost 100 examples."
As for NIST's theory that once the towers' impact-area beams gave
way, the mass above them would rapidly crush the lower stories,
Gage argues that the premise ignores the laws of physics.
"No force can crush that kind of a structure at near freefall speed.
It's ludicrous," he says. "Not only that, the videos show that 95
percent of the south tower is being blown outside, indicating
explosions. And the top of the north tower is being reduced from
15 stories to seven stories before it even starts to drop. Half of
its mass is destroyed in the first two seconds.
"The remaining mass cannot fall at near freefall speed and crush
80,000 tons of steel and pulverize to powder 90,000 tons of concrete
and create tons of molten metal by some unknowable process."
Defending the NIST research, spokesman Michael Newman says the
agency's computer models were highly reliable in their crucial
assessment of the amount of fireproofing dislodgedba factor not
present in fires in other steel buildings cited by Gage.
NIST, supported by a number of independent building and explosives
professionals who are critical of AE911, also stands behind its
theory that the impact of the upper floors crushed the lower ones.
"Basically, gravity and the utter force of the upper floors forced
the towers down," Newsman says. "If you have 20 floors of mass
suddenly released, as it goes downward it picks up more mass and
more forceband, yes, you can have a building collapse in 10 seconds,
and yes, it is physically possible.
"We believe that three years of hard scientific technical investigation
based around a tremendous amount of evidence and confirmed by many
physicists will give you the same conclusions."
Newman adds that while the force of the collapse created air pressure
that blew debris outward, mimicking what Gates argues are explosions
but which NIST says were not, there was more than enough mass still
descending straight down to hammer the lower floors into collapsing
one by one, each failed floor then adding to the descending mass.
However unquestioningly the public, media and government may have
accepted NIST's conclusions ("I saw the planes hit the buildings;
what else could have brought them down?" is a common refrain), Gage
and his "not-so-fast" colleagues argue that they easily found flaws
and ignored evidence in the study.
Most prominently, the 47-story steel structure Building 7 was never
struck by a fire-proof dislodging plane but collapsed anyway.
Dust to Dust
Moreover, according to Gage and others, a major clue that something
in the twin towers was producing far more heat than could a jet
fuel fire (and reached far more of the steel structure than the
areas around the jet fuel fires) is the alleged sightings by some
first-responders and later by some of the debris-removal crews, of
molten metal, like hot lava, some found to be glowing in the basements
of WTC buildings up to three weeks after 9/11bfar longer, they say,
than jet fuel sources could produce. (Interviews of many cleanup-crew
members by a demolition company found no evidence of molten steel
sightings. Gage cites evidence to the contrary.)
Newman says NIST believes that any molten metal sightings, including
metal seen pouring from the south tower, were likely molten aluminum
from the airplane. Moreover, he says, NIST was not presented with
evidence of molten steel, and if some melted, this occurred after
the event, in fires underground, and was not a contributing factor
to the fall of the building. Gage dismisses this as "impossible
without a source of oxygen such as thermate," adding that molten
metal seen in NIST-cited videos isn't the color of molten aluminum.
The 9/11 Truthers also respond that most of the steel evidence was
carted away rapidly and recycled in China before it could be examined
to prove either melting or NIST's key theory of dislodged fireproofing,
and consider this "destruction of evidence."
Supporting AE911's theory is Dr. Steven E. Jones, a nuclear physicist
known for his work in cold fusion. Jones says he was forced into
early retirement from his position as a professor at Brigham Young
University because of his work attempting to show that powerful
explosives were present in the WTC towers.
After Jones initial analysis was harshly criticized for flaws by
BYU's own building engineering department, Jones and other scientists
co-authored a new critique accepted for publication in the peer-reviewed
New Civil Engineering Journal that mentioned thermite as a potential
culprit in the building collapses. This was followed by a research
paper published last April.
Co-authored by Jones and associate professor Niels Harrit of
Copenhagen University's famed Niels Bohr Institute in Denmark, and
by Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, lab manager for BYU's Transmission Electron
Microscopy lab, as well as four other researchers, the paper provided
vivid microscopic photo evidence of highly flammable red-gray chips
that the authors say appear to be super thermite found in four
different reputed WTC dust samples sent to Jones by suspicious New
Yorkers who had collected them shortly after 9/11.
Thermite, a mixture of aluminum powder and iron oxide, is known to
burn through steel. Adding either silicon, magnesium or titanium
to the mixture makes it thermate or "super thermite," a substance
with an accelerated capacity to cut through steel. According to
Gage, "the military uses it to cut through steel like a hot knife
through butter."
"Dr. Jones found the chemical signature of thermite," Gage says.
"So, the evidence all ties together to support the hypotheses of a
controlled demolition."
In an interview with Metro, Jones said his and his colleagues'
microanalysis of the four different samples of dust collected from
various sites in lower Manhattan revealed not only extensive presence
of red-gray chips of unignited thermite, it also found significant
traces of microspheres of previously molten iron that are normally
the product of incendiary explosions far hotter than jet fuel fires.
"What strikes me as odd," Jones said, "is that these red chips we
found are so striking, and yet no one has reported their presence
before. These red chips are very unusual and very prevalent, and
they test out as being consistent with a form of thermite. We can
ignite them, and they react very violently when touched off. So how
do you explain their presence in the towers' dust?
"USGS [the U.S Geological Survey, which did some testing on WTC
dust for NIST] has a lame explanation for not looking for this. I
have been encouraging them to test early dust samples, but they
haven't responded."
Jones said he sent a letter in April 2008 to NIST about his findings,
inviting it to test its own dust for such chips. In public comments
since, NIST has dismissed his research as not scientifically valid,
because Jones can't prove the "chain of custody" of the dust he
tested. Other groups, notably contributors to AE911.info, which
supports the NIST findings, argue that neither the samples nor Jones
tests are reliable.
Jones simply says: "They don't need my dust to test. They have
plenty of dust of their own where they know the chain of custody.
They just won't test it."
Mushroom Clouds
Gage, Jones and other critics cite other official evidence possibly
pointing to explosives including the fact that iron-rich microspheres
were found in tests by USGS and RJ Lee Labs.
Says Gage, "In the twin towers, it's very explosive. You can see
the explosions in all the videos, and what's happening is the
explosions are creating this incredible dust cloud. The dust clouds
are forming immediately. In the dust from the WTC, you have millions
of these tiny, perfectly spherical microspheres of iron. Now, where
did they come from?
"The only way they could have been formed is to have molten iron
and then a series of explosions whose incredible force atomizes,
if you will, the molten iron."
Dr. Jones notes that a USGS scientist told him the microspheres
might have come from the cleanup process, when crews were cutting
steel. "Problem is that we have samples from long before the cleanup
began," he says.
Gage and other Truthers point to other indications of explosives.
Besides vast mushroom clouds of dust and debris exploding outward
at the top of both towers, videos show squibs that appear to be
many small explosions. Moreover, like some first responders and
escapees, in some cases live on-air broadcasts reporters joined in
describing the explosions.
According to Newman, NIST studies showed that the apparent explosions
and squibs were actually compressed air from the force of the
collapse finding openings and blowing debris and dust outward in
an explosive manner.
Eyewitness accounts of explosions, he says, weren't evident in
10,000 interviews NIST conducted, and a few such reports were readily
explained by other phenomena.
"No one gave us any evidence that there was any kind of explosive,"
Newman says. Nor did NIST find evidence of a "severe high-temperature
corrosion attack," he says, noting that sulfur and manganese were
heavily present in building materials and that any corrosion might
have occurred in the debris pile after the buildings' collapse, due
to the conditions there.
AE911 critics support NIST with an argument that explosive sounds
likely derived from electrical and air-conditioning transformers
exploding, the sound of floors collapsing onto each other, or rivets
popping all at once as the pressure got to them. "The way I see it,
it had to be the rivets," the online Journal of Debunking 9/11
Conspiracy Theories quotes one firefighter saying.
"So why didn't we look for explosive residues in the towers?" Newman
asks rhetorically. "Because there was no evidence saying go that
way. There was a lot of evidence saying look at the impact of the
plane, the loss of fire-proofing, the bowing of the perimeter beams,
which was the final straw that broke the camel's back."
Even so, why not test debrisba relatively simple operationbto put
the question fully behind and silence critics? Newman says NIST did
calculate the quantity of thermite that would be neededband found
that it would require a tremendous amount in each column to get it
to melt.
Newman acknowledges that NIST's response that it sees "no need" to
test dust for any form of thermite won't satisfy critics, and adds:
"We don't try to debate or argue with these folks because they have
their opinions and what they believe is evidence, but to us it is
counterproductive to engage in debate.
"We'd rather let the body of evidence we presented stand on its own
merits. We feel this is a very good piece of workbin many ways
pushing investigations way beyond what's gone before. Our work is
to help strengthen buildings, and proof of the validity of our
research is that most all our recommendations for changing building
codes have been accepted by the international organization that
models building codes. That wouldn't have happened if they doubted
our findings."
Gage and his allies say that Newman is one among a group of
government-dependent employees fearful that evidence of explosives
would be too traumatic for the public to handleband probably too
risky to their political superiors.
Notably, however, unlike with, say, Environmental Protection Agency
research on WTC toxins, no whistleblowers have emerged to lend
credence to that theory. Not one NIST scientist or technician has
protested the findings or leaked an accusation that the NIST report
was influenced by political pressure.
Ed Munyak, who is more nuanced than Gage in his critique of NIST,
concedes that the NIST report actually provides some evidence
supporting alternative theories of the WTC collapse. Munyak argues
that top-down influence shows up in the overall presentation of the
report to the public and its final conclusions, not in all its
details provided by working technicians and scientists.
"There is some very good information in the NIST report if you
really look at it and analyze it, as I've done, that makes the case
that something else happened," Munyak says. "The report [conclusion]
says there was one structural failure and after that happened,
collapse was inevitable. Which just is not the case. I'm saying
that's the falsehood of the NIST political leaders, not so much the
people who do the research."
"The fact is that the collapses don't resemble any fire-induced
behavior of structures, but it exactly mimics a controlled demolition,
so why not investigate that? It's all very suspicious and that's
why an independent investigation is needed so we can all learn from
this."
LA Weekly founder Jay Levin is writing a book about the WTC scientific
dispute. Tom McKenzie is a freelance reporter.
Send a letter<http://www.metroactive.com/contact/metro.html> to the
editor about this story.
=======================================================================================================
From: no-re...@examineralerts.com<mailto:no-re...@examineralerts.com>
Date: September 2, 2009 11:38:48 PM GMT-05:00 To:
p...@usa-exile.org<mailto:p...@usa-exile.org> Subject: US Intelligence
Examiner: 9/11 Commission Report questioned by 100 professors
[cid:BB847244-F66B-4960-9623-61DCCC6F8492@local]
<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d2-911...>
9/11 Commission Report questioned by 100
professors<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d2-911...>
Wednesday, September 2,
2009<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d2-911...>
<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d2-911...>Many
respected university professors from all disciplines have expressed
significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. A number even
allege government complicity in the terrorist acts of 9/11. Below
are the highly revealing public statements... Read
more<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d2-911...>B;
Operation Northwoods and
9/11<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d4-Ope...>
Friday, September 4,
2009<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d4-Ope...>
<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d4-Ope...>Was
the Operation Northwoods plan to blow up a drone plane over Cuba
in the early 1960s a precursor to 9/11? Revealing declassified
government documents raise this possibility. As stated in the
opening paragraph of this ABC News report on... Read
more<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d4-Ope...>
B;
False flag
operations<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d5-Fal...>
Saturday, September 5,
2009<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d5-Fal...>
<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d5-Fal...>Was
9/11 a false flag operation? A false flag operation occurs when
elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby
government forces secretly pretend to be a targeted enemy while
attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then... Read
more<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d5-Fal...>
B;
9/11
Conspiracy?<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d7-911...>
Monday, September 7,
2009<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d7-911...>
<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d7-911...>Was
there a 9/11 conspiracy? The US government claims 19 terrorists
conspired to hijack four planes and attack key US targets on Sept.
11, 2001. Thus, the official government story is a 9/11 conspiracy
involving foreign terrorists.Yet many respected,... Read
more<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d7-911...>B;
9/11
timeline<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d9-911...>
Wednesday, September 9,
2009<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d9-911...>
<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d9-911...>The
below 9/11 timeline is based entirely on articles and reports
published on top media websites. Links are provided to verify each
revealing fact. Taken together, the statements in this timeline
raise serious questions as to what really happened... Read
more<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d9-911...>
B;
9/11
information<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d10-91...>
Thursday, September 10,
2009<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d10-91...>
<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d10-91...>This
9/11 information page provides links to reliable, verifiable
information which raises important questions about the official
account of 9/11. Our hearts go out to those killed on this fateful
day and their families. In their honor, let us open... Read
more<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m9d10-91...>
B;
9/11 Information
[http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID6495/images/091010_911_inf...]
9/11 information (Richard Drew/AP)
This 9/11 information page provides links to reliable, verifiable
information which raises important questions about the official
account of 9/11. Our hearts go out to those killed on this fateful
day and their families. In their honor, let us open to learning
what really happened on 9/11, and what we can do about it.
We recommend reading through this entire 9/11 information page
before exploring the links provided. The WantToKnow.info
team<http://www.WantToKnow.info/aboutus> presents this information
as an opportunity for you to educate yourself and others, and to
inspire us to work together to strengthen democracy and build a
brighter future for us all.
9/11 Information Summaries: For the best, most concise introduction
to the 9/11 information, we highly recommend our 9/11 timeline
summaries. These fact-filled summaries provide revealing 9/11
information from respected media sources with links direct to the
articles on their media websites for easy verification of all
information presented. The first two summaries take information
only from the very top, most highly respected major media sources.
Two-page 9/11 information summary:http://www.WantToKnow.info/9-11cover-up
Ten-page 9/11 information summary:http://www.WantToKnow.info/9-11cover-up10pg25-page 9/11 information
summary:http://www.WantToKnow.info/9-11timeline25pg60-page 9/11
information summary:http://www.WantToKnow.info/9-11timeline60pg
Most Important 9/11 Information Document: Over 50 senior military,
intelligence, and government officials are now on record questioning
9/11. Read media statements from members of congress, a former
director of the FBI, a former chief economist of President George
W. Bush, an assistant secretary of the Treasury under President
Reagan, the former head of advanced space programs for the Department
of Defense under Reagan, a British cabinet minister under Prime
Minister Tony Blair, and more. In reports on respected websites
(links provided), each of these prominent leaders now claims that
there are serious problems with the official government story of
9/11. To see also over 100 respected and distinguished professors
claiming a 9/11 cover-up, click
here<http://www.wanttoknow.info/070618professorsquestion911>.
Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government Officials Question
9/11 Commission Reporthttp://www.WantToKnow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport
Top 9/11 Information News Articles: We have collected many news
articles from highly respected media sources which contain eye-opening
information exposing various aspects of the 9/11 cover-up. Links
are always provided to the original sources for verification. The
first link below contains one-paragraph excerpts from incredibly
revealing news articles with the most important articles listed
first. The second link provides the same article excerpts listed
by order of date posted to WantToKnow.info, while the third lists
them by the article date. The fourth link below contains a list of
only headlines and links to some of the most important articles on
9/11. Below these four links, headlines and links to the entire
text of several of the very best articles are also provided.
http://www.WantToKnow.info/911newsarticles- Highly revealing 9/11
news excerptshttp://www.WantToKnow.info/911newsstories- News
excerpts by date postedhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/911mediaarticles
- News excerpts listed in reverse date orderhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/medianewsarticles#a911- Headlines and
links only
Best Individual 9/11 Articles:
Washington Post and MSNBC Reveal Growing Power, Prestige of the
9/11 Movementhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/060908.911conspiracytheorists
BBC Article Titled "The 9/11 Conspiracy Movement"
http://www.WantToKnow.info/070307bbc911conspiracymovement
Time Magazine Explores 9/11 Conspiracies and Poll Showing Many
Believe 9/11 Cover-uphttp://www.WantToKnow.info/060903time.911conspiracies
CNN Gives Major Coverage to 9/11 Cover-up in March 2006 With Charlie
Sheen, Othershttp://www.WantToKnow.info/cnn9-11cover-up
Ex-FBI Chief Accuses 9/11 Commission of Cover-up in Wall Street
Journalhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/051126abledangerlouisfreeh
New York Times article on 9/11 movement, 9/11 polls, 9/11 conventionhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/060610newyorktimes9-11truth
Association of Influential Scholars Challenges 9/11 Commission
Results - Miami Heraldhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/060223scholarsfor911truth
Los Angeles Times Questions Official 9/11 Story in Revealing Interviewhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/911conspiracy
ABC News: U.S. Military Planned to Orchestrate Terrorism Against
U.S. Citizens as War Pretexthttp://www.WantToKnow.info/010501operationnorthwoods
9/11 Information Resources: Our 9/11 resource list contains
one-paragraph summaries of the best books, videos, and websites
we've found which provide reliable 9/11 information. Ratings are
given on both interest and reliability for each resource listed.
Much of what is listed is available for no charge. Links are always
provided for purchase or free viewing.
http://www.WantToKnow.info/resources#a911
Best 9/11 Information Free Videos: First, 9/11: Press for Truth is
magnificent. Don't miss this entertaining, inspiring documentary
focused on the quest of several 9/11 family members to find the
truth of 9/11. The second has become by far the most popular free
video documentary on 9/11. Loose Change is a very well documented,
engaging film presenting an abundance of evidence which the 9/11
Commission completely failed to address. This video is spreading
across the nation and waking people up to what is happening and
what needs to be done. The third video features Prof. David Ray
Griffinbone of the most highly respected theologians in the world,
with over 20 scholarly books under his belt. A lecture he gave to
a standing-room audience of 400 at the University of Wisconsin in
April 2005 was broadcast on C-SPAN 2.
http://www.WantToKnow.info/911video- 9/11: Press for Truthhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/060407bestdocumentary9-11- Loose Changehttp://www.WantToKnow.info/050504davidraygriffin- Prof. David Ray
Griffin on C-SPAN 2
9/11 Information Subtopics:
9/11 Statement Signed by 100 Prominent Americans, 40 9/11 Family
Membershttp://www.WantToKnow.info/911statement
Sibel Edmonds: FBI Translator and 9/11 Whistleblower Testifies in
Congress - USA Today/APhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/050303sibeledmonds911
Able Danger: Multiple Major Media Reports on 9/11 Commission's
Failure and Deceptionhttp://www.WantToKnow.info/abledangernewsarticles
9/11 Movement Event Listings. For a listing of current events and
activities sponsored by the 9/11 Movement, click
here<http://www.911truth.org/calendar.php>. We have no doubt that
by working together we can and will build a brighter
future<http://www.WantToKnow.info/brighterfuture>. When we step out
of fear, secrecy, and polarization, we choose to join with the ever
increasing numbers of people dedicated to working together for the
good of all in our world.
The box immediately below provides several ideas on what you can
do to further educate yourself and spread the word. We also invite
you to comment below and let us know what you think. How best can
we spread the word to make a difference in our world?
What you can do:
* Read other powerful, reliable articles dealing with the 9/11
at this
link<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner%7Etopic186157...>.
* Inform your media and political representatives of this 9/11
information. To contact those close to you, click
here<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner%7Ey2009m5d5-H...>.
Urge them to join in calling for the release of secret documents
and for a new, impartial investigation of 9/11.
* Learn more about 9/11 and the secret societies likely involved
in this powerful
lesson<http://www.hidden-knowledge.net/lessons/05a_power_elite>
from the free Hidden Knowledge Course<http://www.hidden-knowledge.net/>.
* Read concise summaries of revealing major media reports available
here<http://www.wanttoknow.info/911newsarticles> suggesting elements
of government either allowed or facilitated the 9/11 attacks.
* Spread this news to your friends and colleagues, and bookmark
this article on key news websites using the "Share This" icon on
this page, so that we can fill the role at which the major media
is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference.
Fred
Burks<http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner%7Ey2009m3d27-...>
served as personal language interpreter to Clinton, Bush, Cheney,
Gore, and other top dignitaries in secret meetings. As part of an
international network<http://www.wanttoknow.info/aboutus> of
researchers and news analysts, Fred obtains and disseminates key,
reliable information<http://www.wanttoknow.info> about powerful,
yet little-known forces which shape our world. For more, see articles
and links in the right column of this page.
=============================================================================================================
http://www.thehardevidence.com/
Please visit our temporary site atwww.thehardevidence.com<http://www.thehardevidence.com/> (tickets
there) to purchase tickets for the Sydney Saturday Event.
I am warning you all now that these will sell out as they will be
sent out to thousands of interested people next week so please if
you want to come pay now!
14th and 15th in Sydney 17th Melbourne 19th Brisbane 21st Wellington
NZ
[cid:86FBB0EF-8E46-4F99-80DD-F00848F3EFB5@local]
Sydney
Day 1 - The Hard Evidence (Main Event)
When: Saturday, 14th of November Where: Tom Mann Theatre, 136
Chalmers St, Surry Hills (5 mins walk from Central Station) Time:
9:00 am - 9:00 pm (doors open at 8:30 am for registration) Speakers:
Richard Gage (AIA)www.AE911Truth.org<http://ae911truth.org/>, Dr
Steven Joneswww.STJ911.org<http://stj911.org/>, Janice Matthewswww.911Truth.org<http://911truth.org/>, William Rodriguez (TBC)www.william911.com<http://william911.com/> plus many more!
Cost: Adult $60/Concession $30 - Press and poor free on request
Food and drinks: Limited food and drinks will be available for
purchase
Purchase tickets online now - instantly and securely with Sticky
Tickets<http://www.stickytickets.com.au/2039>
Schedule
08:30 - 09:30 Registration 09:30 - 09:35 Welcome to Our Country by
Indigenous Australian Les Bursill.
09:35 - 09:40 Remembering the victims of 9/11 with Pastor Al Person
09:40 - 10:00 Welcome to The Hard Evidence Tour and speakers with
Janice Matthews 10:00 - 11:30 9/11 Blueprint for Truth - The
Architecture of Destruction presented by Richard Gage (AIA).
11:30 - 12:00 Question Time - Richard Gage (AIA) will take moderated
questions from the audience, John Bursill to faciltate.
12:00 - 13:00 Lunch - Food and drinks available at the kiosk.
13:15 - 14:45 Dr Steven Jones (Physicist) presents the The Hard
Evidence of Explosives in the World Trade Center dust and in
particular the evidence of Nanothermite 14:45 - 15:15 Dr Steven
Jones (Physicist) will take moderated questions from audience, John
Bursill to facilitate.
15:15 - 15:30 Afternoon break - Coffee and Tea available at kiosk
15:30 - 17:00 Panel of experts to take moderated questions from
audience regarding the "Controlled Demolition Evidence" and what
they propose we do next to encourage academia and the media to call
for a new investigation. Panel includes; Dr Steven Jones (Physicist),
Richard Gage (AIA), Janice Matthews (911Truth.org), Luke Rudkowski
(WeAreChange NYC), William Rodriguez (Hero and Survivor), Paul Mason
(Structural Engineer), Dr David Leifer (Architect) and James O'Neil
(Barrister). Discussion and questions will be moderated by John
Bursill (Engineer) 17:00 - 18:30 Dinner - (Not provided) 18:30 -
20:45 William Rodriguez "the last man out" tells his story as a
survivor and hero of the 9/11 attacks in NY (TBC - a sponsor for
William is still required) - "Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup"
will be shown if William can't make it, so please contact organisers
to help get William to Australia!
21:00 Doors Close
Day 2 - Truth in Action (Activist Forum)
When: Sunday, 15th of November Where: Tom Mann Theatre, 136 Chalmers
St, Surry Hills (5mins walk from Central Station) Time: 10:00 am -
5:00 pm (Doors open at 9:30) Speakers: Janice Matthewswww.911Truth.org<http:/911truth.org>, Cosmoswww.TruthAction.org<http://truthaction.org/>, Luke Rudkowskiwww.WeAreChange.org<http://wearechange.org/>, Ken Jenkinswww.911TV.org<http://www.911tv.org/>, Dr Frank Leggewww.journalof911studies.com<http://journalof911studies.com/>,
Hereward Fentonwww.911oz.com<http://911oz.com/> /www.WeAreChange.org.au<http://wearechange.org.au/> and John Bursill
Cost: Adult $30/ Concession $15
Purchase tickets online now - instantly and securely with Sticky
Tickets<http://www.stickytickets.com.au/2212>
Schedule
09:30 Registration 10:00 - 11:00 9/11 Truth - Where Do We Go From
Here? Keynote address presented by Janice Matthews 11:10 - 12:00
Luke Rudkowski founder of "WeAreChange" talks about his experiences
from the 9/11 Truth front lines in NYC and how WeAreChange is
changing the world today!
12:00 - 13:00 Lunch Food and Drinks available at the kiosk.
13:00 - 13:40 Cosmos founder of the "Eleventh Day of Every Month"
Campaign talks about his vision for 9/11 Truth Movement and how the
"grass roots" are taking hold world wide 13:50 - 15:00 Ken Jenkins
Psychologist, Engineer and Film Maker presents why "The Truth is
Not Enough", how to break down the psychological barriers to 9/11
Truth 15:00 - 15:15 Afternoon break (Snacks, tea and coffee will
be available at the kiosk) 15:15 - 15:55 Hereward Fenton Anthropologist,
Radio Host and Web Master explores 9/11 disinformation and how to
judge evidence using the scientific method 16:00 - 17:00 Dr Frank
Legge Chemist and Co-Editor of "The Journal of 9/11 Studies" presents
"What Hit the Pentagon?" making the case for the precautionary
principle.
17:30 Doors Close
[snip]
=============================================================================================================
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of jpeg.jpeg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of jpeg.jpeg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a
name of logo_tagline_small.gif]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of default.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of griffin.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of Survivors Graphic2 800x90 JPG60.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of William Rodriguez 220 JPG80.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of COVER_Tower.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of COVER_wtc.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a
name of examinercom_logo_whiite.gif]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a
name of preview.jpg]