| Subject: Re: UFOs use a new state of matter. |
| From: john |
| Date: 22/10/2009, 00:31 |
| Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.electronics.design,comp.ai.philosophy |
On Oct 21, 4:54 pm, amor...@xenon.Stanford.EDU (Alan Morgan) wrote:
In article <d5e0ec1d-8875-4194-bc82-f607b6992...@m13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
john <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:31=A0am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
RichD wrote:
On Oct 16, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
[...]
=A0I don't know why people are so willing to believe these things.
Because it's more fun than boring old science...
wondering and speculating is more exciting than knowing.
[...]
Only if you don't know anything.
The best argument against UFOs being spacecraft is that the technology
demonstrated in "contacts" is so utterly primitive.
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
This was the same Adamski who claimed that the far side of the
moon had trees and mountains with snow-capped peaks? That he
had snacked on Venusian plants? That dude?
Homet was familiar with Adamski's claims and I can't find any
pictures of the petroglyph in question. Is it beyond the realm
of possibility that Homet faked the finding?
Alan
--
Defendit numerus- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Homet wrote a book and
supplied pictures of
all his 20,000 year old glyphs.
Written in stone, buddy.
john