john wrote:

On Oct 22, 10:42 am, amor...@xenon.Stanford.EDU (Alan Morgan) wrote:

In article <7kanqnF37t2b...@mid.individual.net>,
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax  <dirk.bru...@gmail.com> wrote:

Sam Wormley wrote:

john wrote:

Homet wrote a book and
supplied pictures of
all his 20,000 year old glyphs.
Written in stone, buddy.
john

  John, have you any idea how much out right fraud is published in books?

And he knew they were 20,000 years old because he carbon dated the rock????

I was wondering about that as well.  Given that the only references on the
intertubes appear to be repeats of the same basic (heavily woo-woo) data it
looks like someone is going to have to dig up a dead-tree version of the
findings to resolve this question.

Alan
--
Defendit numerus

How old is any of the glyph
stuff in South America?
Have you seen the Guatemala rock garden?
Columns that taper from several feet at the base
to a foot at the top 20 feet high: 40 wide by 20 deep
and so precisely-placed that they line up perfectly.
Maybe NASA did it 20 years ago, but I doubt it.

Makes no difference.
It wasn't unearthed in recent history until
*after* Adamski published the drawing
on it.

john

Well, taking Adamski at face value, it seems those "aliens" are a bunch of liars. I favour the Ultraterrestrial hypothesis, which puts UFOs etc into the paranormal category. See Vallee, Passport to Magonia etc