Re: EX-GI CLAIMS THE ARMY TRACKED UFOs ON RADAR AS EARLY AS 1942

On Oct 24, 1:03�pm, "Andrew W" <removethis_ajwer...@optushome.com.au>
wrote:

H. wrote:

"Andrew W" <removethis_ajwer...@optushome.com.au> wrote
in message
news:4ae23a52$0$5421$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

george wrote:

On Oct 24, 9:38 am, "Andrew W"
<removethis_ajwer...@optushome.com.au>
wrote:

Ask the trained radar operators. Do some research by
getting info on what the case analysts concluded from
them.
I've heard the conclusions but I'm not going to do
your homework for you.
Its up to you to make an effort to find what will
help you to make up your own mind.

OK smart ass. �I am a trained RADAR operator from the
early 50's and it was impossible to tell what was
sometimes ghosts, weather or unknowns. �RADAR has come
a long way in the last 50 years or so. �New electronic
circuits now decrease spurious signals and concentrate
on what is important. �There were some unexplainable
signals but that doesn't mean they were aliens visiting
from the nearest star system.
H.


You are referring to the radar only cases. They were not given very much
attention.
The ones that were given far more attention were the radar traces that
coincided with visual sightings by pilots or ground crew.
Many of those objects flew around the planes at high speed and often went
very close.
You probably haven't heard much about those cases because you probably don't
do much research in this area.
I suggest you guys download some ufo documentaries from the torrent sites to
see the more interesting cases.

That's your translation and as such you are wrong
which I suppose is
nothing new to you..

No, you are wrong because what you're saying is
totally different to what the experts are saying.
The experts and scientists are not saying "Its all
nonsense" are they?
Only you immature and uninformed debunkers are saying
that because your minds are now closed on the subject
because nobody handed you the 'hard evidence' on a
silver platter as you sat in your comfortable
armchairs.

No dipwad. �The experts are saying they don't know.
Which is much different from seeing alien spaceships.
H.


But the experts are not saying that its all nonsense which is what I said.
However, when you look at all the other cases where objects came up close
and were clearly solid and in most cases silver metallic, then it leaves
very few other conclusions than they are vehicles that have sophisticated
propulsion systems, going by their high speed manurers and zero sound and
exhaust, that are for more than just atmosphere travel.

--
If you are a hard skeptic then you haven't researched
or questioned
enough. If you believe something too much then you
have the same
problem.

If you believe, then you have a religion. �Facts not
beliefs. �Where are the facts?
H.


A religion is when you believe something without seeing anything.
This all started only because people including trained pilots started seeing
objects doing things that physical object are not supposed to do.
Facts, yes there are facts, but if you don't research this subject then you
won't find any.
Where have you been looking for the facts? On the six o'clock news? You
won't find them there.

--
If you are a hard skeptic then you haven't researched or questioned
enough. If you believe something too much then you have the same
problem.


Don't try and reason with debunkers and spOOks such as "H"eroin.  The
amount of proof regarding ETs and the corporate/military cover-up is
enormous.  The debunkers days are over and they know it.  I did
predict they would crack-up when the cover-up ended, and as usual I am
100% correct.

Although the debunkers numbers have decreased significantly, a few of
them refuse to surrender.  The General will send a mop-up crew to
gather up the very few remaining truth-terrorist sometime in the near
future.

We may have to put them in a FEMA "care" facility for their own
protection.