george wrote:

On Oct 27, 8:10 pm, "Andrew W" <removethis_ajwer...@optushome.com.au>
wrote:

I am looking for some good cases of recovered craft.
When I have some I will post them.

Meanwhile here's a photo of a craft recovered in
Russia.http://www.burlingtonnews.net/russiandisc.html

I see that you have dropped your claim to be a sceptic.
That is a good start.
Now.
That photo is a setup.
Why?
A vehicle without an taildragger undercarriage is in a nose over
position.
The photo doesn't take in all the 'crash site', just enough to show
the 'vehicle' at an angle therefore it must have hit the ground.
The possibility that there is a supporting structure just out of shot
didn't occur to you?
Go away and look up aircraft crashes in Google especially the damage
to machine and ground.
Your claim 'that only the top brass in the military' know about these
IFOs (Identified flying Objects).
The first thing noticed with the blurry photos is a tank. With I
shouldn't doubt, a tank crew. Then there is the bystander who could be
anything, the phooto being so blurred and the photographer.

Fail

Your opinions on the old Russian photo are noted. I just threw it in their 
as a standby.
Myself I haven't got an opinion on it due to its age and the fact it came 
from Russia.

I haven't had much time to find good articles but here's a couple that are 
interesting.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/02/04

http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case879.htm


-- 
If you are a hard skeptic then you haven't researched or questioned
enough. If you believe something too much then you have the same
problem.