| Subject: Re: EX-GI CLAIMS THE ARMY TRACKED UFOs ON RADAR AS EARLY AS 1942 |
| From: "Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> |
| Date: 30/10/2009, 06:08 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
george wrote:
On Oct 30, 1:25 pm, "Andrew W" <removethis_ajwer...@optushome.com.au>
wrote:
F.Y.I.
Scientists are not having a problem with these concepts any more.
Apparently only you and a few other dinosaurs are.
Not out here in the real world they're not.
Sorry, but yes they are. About 70% of the population now believes and is
interested in metaphysical concepts and whether there is extraterrestrial
life.
Science is now going in that direction. Just ask Dr. Michio Kaku and many
others.
Science demands evidence, evidence that can be tested.
That's one form of science. There are many. Science is basically about
discovery and understanding our world and beyond.
Would you like to point out which scientific fields aliens and alien
invasions come under?
I'd be glad to.
Cryptozoology, astrobiology, exobiology, xenobiology, exopaleontology,
bioastronomy and exopoloitics.
As for alien invasion, that's not going to happen. The military already
determined that the ETs are not a threat to us.
Or crop circles? A bunch of drunken Brits tramping round in the dark?
Cerealogy.
And no, humans did not and could not have made *all* of the 6,000 or so
complex crop circles around the world.
They did however make some for fun.
Out of focus photos and thrown hubcaps don't get far when the
scientific method is applied..
So which 'scientific' field does your 'favorite' radio station
incorporate?
Many.
Playing to the gullible is -not- a science
Now, answer my question.
Who's saying that the subjects on Coast to Coast AM are wacky?
--
If you are a hard skeptic then you haven't researched or questioned
enough. If you believe something too much then you have the same
problem.