| Subject: Re: For those who don't understand why there is a UFO coverup |
| From: "Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> |
| Date: 14/11/2009, 21:34 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.conspiracy,alt.paranet.ufo |
JTEM wrote:
"Andrew W" <removethis_ajwer...@optushome.com.au> wrote:
Actually there are many cases where scores of people
reported large objects, some of them police officers etc.
You're kind of proving my point here, making the exact kind
of claim I described without the slightest proof to back it
up.
You are welcome to check the reports and testimonies yourself. They're all
over the net.
Do you expect them to be delivered to you and dropped in your lap?
The eyewitness accounts of airline pilots, airforce pilots,
astronaughts etc. are very credible.
You mean they really did see something they couldn't
identify?
More than that. The objects in many cases made high speed manurers that show
a high level of technology and intelligence.
Some of the objects were of an enormous size.
You obviously didn't read the posted document which
explains the government's and military's numerous
reasons for the cover-up.
....which is every bit as valid as it would be if I posted
your reasons for inventing the idea of a cover-up.
Seriously, can't you see this? It's even more transparent
than your anecdotal evidence that's missing the anecdotes.
You think I and others have reasons for inventing cover-ups?
Who's crazy now?
Why don't you get off your seat and check out the scores of documented
evidence for the government and military cover-up campaigns?
They still have several reasons to continue the cover-up.
Again, it's "I'm right, and the fact that they don't agree with
me proves I'm right."
That's not an argument, that's a disorder!
You are very ignorant about this subject and your government.
Bob Lazar and others have seen the recovered craft.
Many including high ranking officers have seen craft in flight.
The problem here is that you and others simply can't handle the higher
implications of what all this entails, so you base all your beliefs only on
what you can handle, which is that what your five senses can detect and what
mainstream science has confirmed is all there is and nothing more.
And you refuse to look at the mountains of data coming in every day from
around the world because it will take you out of your comfort zone.
--
If you are a hard skeptic then you haven't researched or questioned
enough. If you believe something too much then you have the same
problem.