| Subject: Re: 2010 - These groups are now considered a debunker-free zone. |
| From: Bob Casanova |
| Date: 05/01/2010, 00:55 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic |
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 00:53:58 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers ASA <science@zzz.com>:
On Jan 3, 1:13 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:29:11 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers ASA <scie...@zzz.com>:
On Jan 2, 11:08 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 23:09:06 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by "Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com>:
On Jan 1, 10:39 am, "Hagar" <hs...@surewest.net> wrote:
"Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote in messagenews:48c9d373-d752-4cec-a31e-82f506f1f031@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
The orders have come down from the Ocatgon®, these newsgroups are now
considered a debunker AND kook-free zone. Thus the following useful
idiots cannot post here any longer: Hagar, Cujo and his numerous sock-
puppets and the one that is called "H"eroin.
You MUST leave now.
I'd like to thank you for all your previous posts, but I can't, so I
won't.
Sir Arthu®
**************************************
... from the O-C-A-T-G-O-N ????
WTF is that, LipFlapper ????
You friggin' moe-ron, the Octagon is the Pentagon WITHIN the
Pentagon.
He asked about the "Ocatgon", not the "Octagon"; presumably
it has something to do with missing cats (or maybe invisible
aliens). *Do* try to keep up, Artie/Gary...
Get the message now?
Of course. Do you?
"Well...uh...duh...no, I don't. Uh... What was the question,
again?"
Translation from Artie/GarySpeak to English provided free of
charge.
You're welcome.
Debunkers...ne'er-do-wells...idiots...KooKs...spOOks...<drool>...
<puke>...<drool>...Gack!
govern yourself accordingly.
Absolutely. And Artie/Gary...?
A simple "Thanks" would have sufficed; as I said, the
translation was free.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless