Re: Obama and the age of permanent war, John Pilger
Subject: Re: Obama and the age of permanent war, John Pilger
From: "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com>
Date: 28/03/2010, 13:23
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy

On Mar 27, 7:59 am, Riaz K Tayob <riaz.ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Obama and the age of permanent war

John Pilger

Published 25 March 2010

America has emerged from the era of outright aggression on the rest
of the world and into the age of nuanced terror.

Here is news of the Third World War. The United States has invaded
Africa. US troops have entered Somalia, extending their war front
from Afghanistan and Pakistan to Yemen and now the Horn of Africa.
In preparation for an attack on Iran, "bunker-buster" bombs are
said to be arriving at the US base on the British island of Diego
Garcia in the Indian Ocean.

In Gaza, the sick and abandoned population, mostly children, is
being entombed behind underground American-supplied walls to reinforce
a criminal siege. In Latin America, the Obama administration has
secured seven bases in Colombia from which to wage a war of attrition
against the popular democracies in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and
Paraguay. Meanwhile, the secretary of "defence", Robert Gates,
complains that "the general [European] public and the political
class" are so opposed to war, they are an "impediment" to peace.

Remember, this is the month of the March Hare.

According to an American general, the invasion of Afghanistan is
not so much a real war as a "war of perception". Thus, the recent
"liberation of the city of Marjah" from the Taliban's "command-and-control
structure" was pure Hollywood.

Marjah is not a city; there was no Taliban command and control. The
heroic liberators killed the usual civilians, the poorest of the
poor. Otherwise, it was fake. A war of perception is meant to provide
fake news for the folks back home, to make a failed colonial adventure
seem worthwhile and patriotic, as if The Hurt Locker were real and
the parades of flag-wrapped coffins through Wootton Bassett were
not a cynical propaganda exercise.

Silent witness

"War is fun", the helmets in Vietnam used to say with bleakest
irony, meaning that if a war is shown to have no purpose other than
to justify voracious power in the cause of lucrative fanaticisms
such as the weapons industry, the danger of truth beckons. This
danger can be illustrated by comparing the liberal perception of
Tony Blair in 1997 as one "who wants to create a world [where]
ideology has surrendered entirely to 'values'" (Hugo Young, the
Guardian) to the public reckoning today of a liar and war criminal.

Western war-states such as the US and Britain are threatened not
by the Taliban or any other introverted tribesmen in faraway places,
but by the anti-war instincts of their own citizens. Consider the
draconian sentences handed down in London to scores of young people
who protested against Israel's assault on Gaza in January last year.
Following demonstrations in which paramilitary police "kettled"
thousands, first offenders have received two and a half years in
prison for minor offences that would not normally carry a custodial
sentence. On both sides of the Atlantic, serious dissent exposing
illegal war has become a serious crime.

Silence in other high places allows this moral travesty. Across the
arts, literature, journalism and the law, liberal elites, having
hurried away from the debris of Blair and now Obama, continue to
fudge their indifference to the barbarism and aims of western state
crimes by promoting retrospectively the evils of their convenient
demons, such as Saddam Hussein. With Harold Pinter gone, try compiling
a list of well-known writers, artists and advocates whose principles
are not consumed by the "market" or neutered by their celebrity.

Who among them has spoken out about the holocaust in Iraq during
almost 20 years of lethal blockade and assault? And all of it has
been deliberate. On 22 January 1991, the US Defence Intelligence
Agency predicted in impressive detail how a blockade would
systematically destroy Iraq's clean water system and lead to
"increased incidences, if not epidemics, of disease". So the US set
about eliminating clean water for the Iraqi population: one of the
causes, Unicef noted, of the deaths of half a million Iraqi infants
under the age of five. But this extremism apparently has no name.

Partners in crime

Norman Mailer once said he believed the US, in its endless pursuit
of war and domination, had entered a "pre-fascist era". Mailer
seemed tentative, as if trying to warn about something even he could
not quite define. "Fascism" is not right, for it invokes lazy
historical precedents, conjuring yet again the iconography of German
and Italian repression. On the other hand, American authoritarianism,
as the American cultural critic Henry Giroux pointed out recently,
is "more nuance, less theatrical, more cunning, less concerned with
repressive modes of control than with manipulative modes of consent".

This is Americanism, the only predatory ideology to deny that it
is an ideology. The rise of tentacular corporations that are
dictatorships in their own right and of a military that is now a
state within the state, set behind the fagade of the best democracy
35,000 Washington lobbyists can buy, and a popular culture programmed
to divert and stultify, is without precedent. More nuanced, perhaps,
but the results are unambiguous. Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck,
the senior UN officials in Iraq during the US- and British-led
blockade, are in no doubt they witnessed genocide. They saw no gas
chambers.

Insidious, undeclared, even presented wittily as enlightenment on
the march, the Third World War and its genocide proceeded, human
being by human being.

In the coming election campaign in Britain, the candidates will
refer to this war only to laud "our boys". The candidates are almost
identical political mummies, shrouded in the Union Jack and the
Stars and Stripes. As Blair demonstrated a mite too eagerly, the
British elite love America because America allows them to barrack
and bomb the natives and call themselves "partners". We should
interrupt their fun.

http://www.newstatesman.com/print/201003250010

__._,_.___ Reply to
sender<mailto:riaz.ta...@gmail.com?subject=Obama%20and%20the%20age%20of%20per
manent%20war,%20John%20Pilger> | Reply to
group<mailto:toesl...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Obama%20and%20the%20age%20of%20
permanent%20war,%20John%20Pilger> | Reply via web
post<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toeslist/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxZjcyZGRmBF9TAzk
3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIxNTc3MDcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDgzNDY5BG1zZ0lkAzIwMDczBHNlYwNm
dHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTI2OTY3OTQwOA--?act=reply&messageNum=20073>
| Start a New
Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toeslist/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMG03bWF1BF9TAz
k3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIxNTc3MDcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDgzNDY5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGM
Ec3RpbWUDMTI2OTY3OTQwOA--> Messages in this
topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toeslist/message/20073;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ajFha
W0xBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIxNTc3MDcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDgzNDY5BG1zZ0lkAzIwMD
czBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI2OTY3OTQwOAR0cGNJZAMyMDA3Mw-->
(1) Recent Activity:

Visit Your
Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toeslist;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZm9wZWNiBF9TAzk3MzU
5NzE0BGdycElkAzIxNTc3MDcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDgzNDY5BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3Rp
bWUDMTI2OTY3OTQwOA-->
[http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDM
TJkYWw1aWFrBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIxNTc3MDcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDgzNDY5BHNlYw
NmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMjY5Njc5NDA4> Switch to:

Text-Only<mailto:toeslist-traditio...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Change%20Delive
ry%20Format:%20Traditional>, Daily
Digest<mailto:toeslist-dig...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Email%20Delivery:%20Dig
est>
Unsubscribe<mailto:toeslist-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
Terms of Use<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
.

__,_._,___