Re: Gravity - Anti-Gravity
Subject: Re: Gravity - Anti-Gravity
From: John
Date: 16/08/2010, 20:47
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.visitors

On Aug 16, 12:14 pm, John <jyanj...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 10:47 am, John <jyanj...@rocketmail.com> wrote:





On Aug 11, 1:50 am, John Ayres <jyanj...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:17:53 -0700, John Ayres

<jyanj...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
What if, everything that exists possesses a quality or feature and we
can call that feature gravity and it is constantly pulling inwardsly,
exerting a force on everything outside. Now, if we learn how to switch
the pulling force gravity, and switch it around so it is a pushing
force, and then directionalize it, we could get that directionable
pushing force. We can call this pushing force, Anti-gravity.

Then, all there is to do is to find the best alloy that will push with
the greatest force with the least bit of energy applied. Further
testing could be done to see if it can't be directionalized.

Once you learn how to directionalize it, all there is to do is to find
a way to regulate it, that is the intensity by which force is
directionalized outwardsly.

Finally, install it in your carriage, with all the gear you'll need to
get it to run self-sufficiently, sit in your cockpit, then turn it on,
and up you go.

With similar and duplicate systems built into the carriage, with the
right configuration, you can get the carriage to hoover, spin, reverse
spin, accelerate, and basically, move through the atmosphere.

So, they've found a way to do exactly that. Big deal, right? Big deal.
Yes!

That's what those guys were doing back in 1971, over in the
Shenendoha(sp?) mountains, testing out their new little anti-gravity
machine. Well, now we have, idf's, or identified flying objects. :)

Gosh. The Darla Starship has come a long way since 1971 and they've
added a few things, as well, It seems.

John Ayres

"I am but a child on a shoreline of a vast lake of unanswered questions."

Issac Newton

Basic Reverse Gravitational Stunts

Reversing an object's gravity, can give you eye blinding speeds.

By reversing an object's gravity, you can do those kinds of stunts
where the whole object, and it's gravitational environment, which
includes you, by the way, can take off, and zip away together at
speeds that go by you in a blink of an eye.

The question that needs to be answered is, how do you reverse an
object's gravity?

John Ayres

Update:

Apparently,  you can develop a pushing force by having a core or axis
and two revolving rings or cylinders around it, one revolving in one
direction, and the other revolving in the opposite direction. By
applying a high current to the revolving rings or cylinders, you will
get the pushing force, and anti-gravity. An electrically charged
vortex will develop and it will lift things just like a tornado except
it is electrically charged and the electricity is doing the lifting.
That I happened to see on YouTube. It was in a video on Nazi
Conspiracy, Hitler's attempt to build war weapons to defeat the Allies
during WWII.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGI42LU-gUQ&feature=related

Reversing an object's gravity, once accomplished, you set up a mini
gravitational environment and in that reverse gravitational
environment, you can develop eye blinding speeds. You can do those
kinds of stunts where the whole object, and it's gravitational
environment, which includes you, by the way, can take off, and zip
away together at speeds that go by you in a blink of an eye.

John Ayres


Now if I was able to learn what an anti-gravitational environment is,
and how to create it just by watching YouTube, what the hell are the
scientists doing at NASA? Don't they understand the simplicity of it?
Now. Why won't they do anything to create a new kind of propulsion,
anti-gravity propulision?

John Ayres

I suppose a lot of chemistry jobs will be lost at NASA if they switch
over to an electricty based propulsion system and if they give up on
their chemicals based propulsion system. People in the chem labs won't
like that, will they?

John Ayres