My Dearest Charles,

<UseNetOnly@t-online.de> wrote in message...
news:5v6076553cihedj0kscq7u5kt7hikohdej@pasoschweiz.de...

Sir Gilligan Horry <GM@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:

HVAC wrote...

You see those 'void' areas?

That's where space is expanding the most.

That's where space is missing Horry.

That's where energy predominates matter. C.

Sorry, Charles, i don't understand you.  Even in the dubious
mainstream's "space is void" context, where many kinds of
photons are distributed in all directions, there would be a
heavy preponderance of energy even in the densest of mass
areas (galaxies).

From my own perspective, where space is comprised of
energy, a special "gravitational" energy that is modulated by
photonic energy, where matter is an extension of this energy,
or "spatially extended" as Einstein put it, energy still must
predominate matter in all areas, void or otherwise.

Why would those void areas be said to be places where
energy predominates matter, if this is the case all over the
Universe, from the voidest, sparsest areas to the densest?

Just curious, Charles.  Have i misinterpreted what you said?

happy days and...
   starry starry nights!

-- 
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.:  "We never know the worth of water 'til the
           well is dry."                    > Thomas Fuller

P.P.S.:  http://astronomy.painellsworth.net
                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth