Re: REPOST: Debunkers MUST have a special license to post here!//NO EXCEPTIONS EVER!
Subject: Re: REPOST: Debunkers MUST have a special license to post here!//NO EXCEPTIONS EVER!
From: Chris Krolczyk
Date: 13/10/2010, 22:12
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy

On Oct 13, 9:17 am, "Jerry Kolnick." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:37 pm, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 9, 1:49 pm, "DR. Wholeflaffers!" <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:

I DID predict a debunker melt-down when the UFO cover-up officially
ended, and again I (sic) proven RIGHT!

Kolnick? Complaining about someone *else* having a meltdown?

BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!

-Chris Krolczyk

Chris, for some completely unknown reason, you missed the forest AND
the trees.

Look at the title of his post, Debunkers MUST have a special license
to post here.

Oh. Look. He said "license".

How tempting. How *very* tempting.

http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/alternative/42244/Sir-Arthur-aka-Jerry-Kolnick-of-Vancouver-WA

Kyle Robinson <greyw...@aracnet.com> (employee of aracnet) wrote:

#> Jerry Kolnick was shut off because he was claiming to be a doctor.
#> When aproached about it, he couldn't produce a medical license or
#> doctoral certificate to prove he was who he said he was. Here in
the
#> state of Oregon, practicing medicine without a license is a big
#> no-no. A legitimate doctor shouldn't have had a problem getting us
#> proof, which this person couldn't do.

#> The onus of proof was on him, since he was in question. He couldn't
#> prove that he was a doctor, yet he was posting and giving medical
#> advise as one. When questioned, he tried to deny it, but we had the
#> logs and headers of his posts. We don't want that on our system. We
#> refused him further service, and last I saw, he's got an account on
#> another provider and could again be saying he's a doctor.

You're a very stupid, dishonest person, Kolnick.

For our amusement, don't ever change.

-Chris Krolczyk