| Subject: Re: REPOST: Debunkers MUST have a special license to post here!//NO EXCEPTIONS EVER! |
| From: Bob Casanova |
| Date: 14/10/2010, 20:28 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy |
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Chris Krolczyk
<arfiend2009@gmail.com>:
On Oct 13, 3:11 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:37:55 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Chris Krolczyk
<arfiend2...@gmail.com>:
On Oct 9, 1:49 pm, "Jerry Kolnick" <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
I DID predict a debunker melt-down when the UFO cover-up officially
ended, and again I (sic) proven RIGHT!
Kolnick? Complaining about someone *else* having a meltdown?
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!
What the hell is a "Kolnick", an Artie/Gary sock puppet?
Nope. Sorry for the URL wraparound in advance:
http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/alternative/42244/Sir-Arthur-aka-Jerry-Kolnick-of-Vancouver-WA
OK; thanks for the ref. Loons abound...
And what's he on about with this "cover-up officially ended"
BS? Did ETs land on the Mall?
Nah. It's just Kolnick making a pathetic effort to
grab more attention, apparently by coming off as
someone so loony-tune that he could easily be
a *parody* of an aliens-r-here True Believer.
But hey, newsgroup troll are always like that,
aren't they?
The talented ones are, but based on the info in the link you
provided this looks to me like a loon rather than a troll.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless