Re: Abduction "Checklist"//Are Aliens Negative From Our Point-Of View?
Subject: Re: Abduction "Checklist"//Are Aliens Negative From Our Point-Of View?
From: "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com>
Date: 19/01/2012, 10:39
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy,alt.alien.visitors

On Jan 17, 9:41 am, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/14/2012 2:58 AM, Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA wrote:

Abduction "Checklist"//Are Aliens Negative From Our Point-Of View?

Your request to make *another* list is,....

Accepted.  Thanks for your acceptance, perhaps there is HOPE.

In one of the most moving accounts in the annals of alien abductions,
Turner tells Ted Rice’s story, in “Masquerade of Angles”, of how as an
eight-year old boy. Rice found himself along with his much-beloved
grandmother inside a UFO and surrounded by a variety of aliens,
including a tall reptoid.  The aliens brought out the grandmother’s
husband, who had been dead for six years, and insisted she have sex
with him. Partway through the act, the grandfather metamorphosed into
the tall reptoid.  Now the reptoid demanded to have sex with Rice.
The boy’s grandmother refused to allow this, even though the aliens
insisted she would be dead in two days if she did not renege.  Two
days later, the grandmother was indeed dead of a massive heart attack.

The blatant deceit of this incident shaded over into Turner’s other
area of contention with the aliens; often, they were cruel, inflicting
physical and mental pain on the abductees.  One of the “Taken”
interviewees was so traumatized by her experience of impregnation on a
UFO that she could not resume normal sex.  Another suffered a bloody,
painful miscarriage in her own bathroom.  On account of a pulling
action by the aliens, a third victim sustained a spinal injury so
severe that her doctor warned he it could prove permanent.  And these
physical problems were accompanied by the usual emotional trauma of
the abductee: confusion, terror, paranoia and ambivalence.

If abductees often came to believe that the aliens must somehow have
some lofty purpose, this was because, insisted Turner, they have total
control over our minds.  Turner cited many cases pointing to a psychic
technology that enabled the aliens to make us see whatever they wanted
us to see.  They could create virtual reality scenarios at will, she
was certain.  The abductees took home from their abduction experineces
as memories whatever the aliens wanted them to remember.  Even what
was revived under hypnosis might only be a screen memory.

Turner was profoundly at variance with those who claimed we would see
the alien abduction phenomenon as benign, if only we could understand
it—but we were not capable of understanding it.  The author spelled
out in “Taken” what became her credo: “In spite of what some prominent
abduction theorists tell us about avoiding thinking in terms of ‘good
ad evil’ or ‘positive and negative’ when it comes to the aliens, this
cannot be done, nor should it be.  For these women, for my husband and
myself, for all abductees, knowing that we have been made a part of
this agenda and that we have been implanted, trained and programmed to
participate in some future scenario, how can we not ask to what
purpose our minds, bodies and souls will be used?

Turner entertained at least one comprehensive theory about why the
alien abductions took place.  At least one group, she suspected, the
Reptoids, needed to eat our bodies.  Rice had provided her with a
chilling account (similar to accounts in “Taken”) of an alien
abduction during which reptoid aliens actually murdered the psychic
(Rice watched this, as if disembodied from a distance), then sucked
the soul out of his body into a black box.  In short time, they re-
released the soul back into a clone of his body, which they had
manufactured apparently using organic materials reaped from cattle
mutilations.  Turner believed the reptoid then ate Rice’s original body
—and in general need to ingest human bodies—because it was saturated
with the emotional and/or the soul vibrations of the human.  The
reptoids did not eat cloned bodies, she speculated, because they had
not become imbued with soul/emotion substance in the course of
living.  (Turner also wondered if the oft-mentioned hybrids might not
simple be organic fodder used to manufacture the bodies of the zombie-
like, carefully-regimented ‘greys.’)

What Turner perceived as deceit and cruelty of the aliens—made her
into a human rights activist who insisted that we must stand up for
ourselves and seize back our souls from this rapacious, non-human
species (she speculated that the aliens had developed parallel to us,
on this Earth, then become trans-dimensional.)  “To accept a spiritual
explanation for the abduction process and the abducting entities,” she
told an interviewer for Contact Forum, in May/June 1995, “is foolhardy
and potentially dangerous to our souls.”  To another interviewer she
reiterated that, if we do not rouse ourselves, “we may come to the
point where we cede the sovereignty of our souls.  We should stand up
for our souls.  I think there is a possibility of finding out how to
change the situation.”

Until shortly before her death, Turner regularly issued veritable
calls to arms from the podiums of UFO conferences across the U.S. and
abroad.  The aliens, she said time and again, used their powers to
control our perceptions and practice disinformation in order to break
down our resistance and deceive us into believing they were interested
in our well-being—when they were not.  All the evidence, she said,
suggested their purposes were totally self-serving and without regard
for the needs of homo sapiens. Now was the time, she insisted, “to
work at getting back control.”  Turner contended the best defense
against alien intrusions was not “abduction therapy”—but abduction
research itself.  To audiences around the country she listed what she
considered to be the only “facts” that might be construed about the
alien invaders:

-	We do not know with any certainty what they are.

-	At least some of the aliens lie.

-	During encounters, they control our perceptions.

-	They can implant false memories.

-	What we report about them is what they want us to report.

-	The alien agenda has physical aims and procedures that have nothing
to do with reproduction.

-	From childhood, they manipulate us physically, spiritually and
sexually.

-	They create virtual reality scenarios that are absolutely real to
the abductees.

-	They show an extraordinary interest in human souls and in our
thoughts.

-	There is some element of human involvement in the UFO phenomenon.

Turner suspected the military sometimes harassed abductees after they
had been harassed by aliens; but the Arkansas researcher did not
reveal facts for fear of endangering friends.

The abductee/author insisted the aliens were engaged in a propaganda
war to convince us that their designs were more benevolent than they
were.  They might be creating virtual reality scenarios of
crossbreeding, she thought, to suggest, that we share commonalties
with them and that they need us.  But, she said, there are just as
many accounts of, for example, brain operations as there are of fetal
transplants.  In a propaganda campaign that included demonstrating
their superiority and their proprietary relationship to us—and in
consistently painting a benevolent picture of themselves—they were
basically attempting, she had become certain, to “debase and lower our
self-view, and to break down our resistances.”

Articulately, always with sensitivity, the former college lecturer
maintained there were a number of steps abductees could take n the
face of alien provocation:

-	Educate themselves about the phenomenon; there is some control in
knowledge.

-	Let go of the fear, it is through fear that negative entities
maintain control.  Anger is a more effective defense than fear.

-	Abductees should be aware of how they’re reacting; they should learn
to step out of themselves, and to maintain perspective.

-	Maintain a good quality of life.

-	Stay close to families.

-	Confide. “The hell with the results,” says Turner.  “You don’t need
the burden of carrying this around [without being able to talk about
it.]”

If the terrors of the abduction experience made us grow stronger,
concluded Turner, it was not because the aliens wanted us to have this
strength, but because we will it ourselves.  Similarly, she insisted,
we should take into our own hands this appalling violation of our
rights as human beings, and fight it with all the resources which we
can muster out of the richness of human creativity and experience.

This brave and defiant refusal, in the name of humanity, to
countenance suffering from an alien tyrant masquerading as a
benefactor, is Karla Tuner’s final legacy.