Re: US Hypocrisy Astonishes the World//Intelligence Data !!!

On Mar 7, 2:18�am, Sir Gilligan Horry <G...@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:

Sir Arthur Wholeflaffers // Banned ....
The


US Hypocrisy Astonishes the World

Americans have lost their ability for introspection, thereby revealing
their astounding hypocrisy to the world.  US War Secretary Robert
Gates has condemned the Associated Press and a reporter, Julie
Jacobson, embedded with US troops in Afghanistan, for taking and
releasing a photo of a US Marine who was wounded in action and died
from his injury.  The photographer was on patrol with the Marines when
they came under fire. She found the courage and presence of mind to do
her job. Her reward is to be condemned by the warmonger Gates as
�insensitive.� Gates says her employer, the Associated Press, lacks
�judgment and common decency.� The American Legion jumped in and
denounced the Associated Press for a �stunning lack of compassion and
common decency.�

To stem opposition to its wars, the War Department hides signs of
American casualties from the public. Angry that evidence escaped the
censor, the War Secretary and the American Legion attacked with
politically correct jargon: �insensitive,� �offended,� and the
�anguish,� �pain and suffering� inflicted upon the Marine�s family.
The War Department sounds like it is preparing a harassment tort.
Isn�t this passing the buck? The Marine lost his life not because of
the Associated Press and a photographer, but because of the war
criminals--Gates, Bush, Cheney, Obama, and the US Congress that
supports wars of naked aggression that serve no American purpose, but
which keeps campaign coffers filled with contributions from the
armaments companies.  Marine Lance Cpl. Joshua M. Bernard is dead
because the US government and a significant percentage of the US
population believe that the US has the right to invade, bomb, and
occupy other peoples who have raised no hand against us but are
demonized with lies and propaganda.

For the American War Secretary it is a photo that is insensitive, not
America�s assertion of the right to determine the fate of Afghanistan
with bombs and soldiers.  The exceptional �virtuous nation� does not
think it is insensitive for America�s bombs to blow innocent villagers
to pieces. On September 4, the day before Gates� outburst over the
�insensitive� photo, Agence France Presse reported from Afghanistan
that a US/Nato air strike had killed large numbers of villagers who
had come to get fuel from two tankers that had been hijacked from
negligent and inattentive occupation forces:

� �Nobody was in one piece. Hands, legs and body parts were scattered
everywhere. Those who were away from the fuel tanker were badly
burnt,� said 32-year-old Mohammad Daud, depicting a scene from hell.
The burned-out shells of the tankers, still smoking in marooned wrecks
on the riverbank, were surrounded by the charred-meat remains of
villagers from Chahar Dara district in Kunduz province, near the Tajik
border. Dr. Farid Rahid, a spokesperson in Kabul for the ministry of
health, said up to 250 villagers had been near the tankers when the
air strike was called in.� What does the world think of the United
States? The American War Secretary and a US military veterans
association think a photo of an injured and dying American soldier is
insensitive, but not the wipeout of an Afghan village that came to get
needed fuel.

The US government is like a criminal who accuses the police of his
crime when he is arrested or a sociopathic abuser who blames the
victim. It is a known fact that the CIA has violated US law and
international law with its assassinations, kidnappings and torture.
But it is not this criminal agency that will be held accountable.
Instead, those who will be punished will be those moral beings who,
appalled at the illegality and inhumanity of the CIA, leaked the
evidence of the agency�s crimes. The CIA has asked the US Justice
(sic) Department to investigate what the CIA alleges is the �criminal
disclosure� of its secret program to murder suspected foreign
terrorist leaders abroad. As we learned from Gitmo, those suspected by
America are overwhelmingly innocent. The CIA program is so
indefensible that when CIA director Leon Panetta found out about it
six months after being in office, he cancelled the program (assuming
those running the program obeyed) and informed Congress.

Yet, the CIA wants the person who revealed its crime to be punished
for revealing secret information. A secret agency this unmoored from
moral and legal standards is a greater threat to our country than are
terrorists. Who knows what false flag operation it will pull off in
order to provide justification and support for its agenda. An agency
that is more liability than benefit should be abolished. The agency�s
program of assassinating terrorist leaders is itself fraught with
contradictions and dangers. The hatred created by the US and Israel is
independent of any leader. If one is killed, others take his place.
The most likely outcome of the CIA assassination program is that the
agency will be manipulated by rivals, just as the FBI was used by one
mafia family to eliminate another. In order to establish credibility
with groups that they are attempting to penetrate, CIA agents will be
drawn into participating in violent acts against the US and its
allies.

Accusing the truth-teller instead of the evil-doer is the position
that the neoconservatives took against the New York Times when after
one year�s delay, which gave George W. Bush time to get reelected, the
Times published the NSA leak that revealed that the Bush
administration was committing felonies by violating the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act. The neocons, especially those
associated with Commentary magazine, wanted the New York Times
indicted for treason. To the evil neocon mind, anything that
interferes with their diabolical agenda is treason. This is the way
many Americans think. America uber alles! No one counts but us (and
Israel). The deaths we inflict and the pain and suffering we bring to
others are merely collateral damage on the bloody path to American
hegemony.

The attitude of the �freedom and democracy� US government is that
anyone who complains of illegality or immorality or inhumanity is a
traitor. The Republican Senator Christopher S. Bond is a recent
example. Bond got on his high horse about �irreparable damage� to the
CIA from the disclosures of its criminal activities. Bond wants those
�back stabbers� who revealed the CIA�s wrongdoings to be held
accountable. Bond is unable to grasp that it is the criminal
activities, not their disclosure, that is the source of the problem.
Obviously, the whistleblower protection act has no support from
Senator Bond, who sees it as just another law to plough under. This is
where the US government stands today: Ignoring and covering up
government crimes is the patriotic thing to do. To reveal the
government�s crimes is an act of treason. Many Americans on both sides
of the aisle agree. Yet, they still think that they are The Virtuous
Nation, the exceptional nation, the salt of the earth.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23439.htm