How to be a Newsgroup UFO Debunker//10 E-Z Steps!! (Updated-2012)

How to be a Newsgroup UFO Debunker//10 E-Z Steps!! (Updated-2012)

Many concerned citizens want to know the secrets on
How to be a Newsgroup UFO Debunker and why!

Well the "why" is the easy part.  The "National Security
State" decided long ago that the information regarding
the reality of UFOs and the alien presence on Earth must
be kept at  the "Above Top Secret" level forever.
They even came up with the strategy called "debunking"
to explain away all sightings and other phenomenon
dealing with our ET visitors.  They felt at that time,
and still feel, the all of mankind's Institutions would be
at risk of collapse.  This is why information regarding
UFOs and the alien presence must be routinely ridiculed
and dismissed.  It is for the public's own safety.
Isn't that thoughtful of us.  By the way, the aliens
want to keep their activities clandestine too, especially
in view of human-beings alarmist tendencies.

Now the "how" to be a UFO newsgroup debunker.
Follow these ten easy steps.  If you forget them;
remember, there are plenty of official "State" debunkers
on theses newsgroups to help you in your timely task.
Just ask Lou Spinetti or Dean "Team" Adams.  They are
only too willing to assist you in your endeavor.

#1)  Never post anything original - It's true, UFO debunkers
NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE post anything
new.  That just isn't  what we do.  If we do post something,
make sure it's an attack on a honest researcher and not
about the subject matter/  Do what admitted "5-time loser"
Twit does, just make up stuff and respond to every post,
and post over 70 times a day.

#2)  Snipe at all credible posts.  -  This is what we do.
We make ourselves a nuisance to credible, documentable,
and verifiable posts.  We are here to confuse the public,
not help the public find the truth and facts concerning ETs!

#3)  Find the most innocuous part of the post to attack
and forget the rest.  For instance, if someone
just relayed some information about a new crop-circle
in England, and they discussed the lights in the sky,
perhaps some lab analysis on radioactive nuclei,
or other strange anomalies; talk about how the
wheat crop is doing this year.  It's effective and it also
throws a monkey-wrench in the works.

#4)  IMPORTANT: Remember, as often as possible
UFO debunkers - the following two words must
be used as frequently as feasible; customarily on a daily basis.
Here are the UFO debunkers two MAGIC WORDS:
"delusional" and "paranoid".  In addition, when discussing
alien abductions, the word "confabulation" comes in handy.

#5) Ask for the person's credentials.  If they have
a Ph.D. ask them for the relevance of it to the subject
matter; if they don't have a Ph. D;  then attack
them for not having one.  It's a win-win approach
that makes even the most "useful idiot" look a little better!

#6)  Whatever you do, debunkers, never address
the facts.  Those are items we do not want to discuss.
They work against the cover-up and enlighten the
public about the truth.  So the best advice is to
IGNORE THE FACTS!  Never under any circumstances
discuss the well-researched scientific data
regarding the hundreds of thousands of crop-circles;
animal mutilations; alien abductions; UFO sightings;
government documents.  That could be rather embarrassing.

#7)  If you have to respond to a fact or two, then
acknowledge them and move on to something
else as quick as possible.  It's ugly to talk about
embrogenesis; ion conductivity; radioactive
nuclei, excision lines made by a laser; bloodless
carcasses.  It's better to talk about swamp gas,
ball lightning and the Planet Venus.

#8) Don't tell the public anything.  Pretend
we don't know what they are talking about
and that we have told the public
everything.  The bigger the lie the better
the lie.  If anyone suggests that the
National Reconnaissance Office or the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (O-BORG) or the
Central Intelligence Agency (Borsch-Belt) or the
National Security Agency  (Manetti) is hiding information;
pretend you've never heard of them!!!

9) Attack the person - try and change the topic from
the aliens to the person writing about the aliens.
Too much has already been made public about
the Extraterrestrial visitors and the last thing we
need is even more factual material to get out.
Again: Attack the person not the evidence!

10) Last but not least, pretend you are really trying
to find out what's going on.  The late Carl Sagan
was a master at this; but in reality he was playing the role
of the official State "UFO-Debunker" to full effect.

As an addemunm - If you have to post something original (such as the
new
sp00k-on-the-block Echelon Manetti) make sure you do not address the
evidence, but attack the person.  That's right, it's okay to write
original
material as long as it has nothing to do with the alien presence.
Refer to rule #9 which is attack the person not the evidence.

Keep this in mind: Members of the Intelligent Agencies
HAVE TO READ EVERY POST; in case hard information
is released by members of the Military and/or Secret Government;
such as sensitive material released by Vance Davis of the Gulf Breeze
6.

Vance Davis and five others used a Ouija board while stationed
in Germany and downloaded some alien information about the
future.  They proceeded to go AWOL and headed to Gulf Breeze, Florida,
which has been a UFO hot-spot for over a decade.  They were
subsequently arrested and threatened with death by our wonderful
Military.  Following a meeting at the White House with Pres. Bush
and ETs, the decision was made to grant all of the soldiers
AN HONORABLE DISCHARGE.  Apparently this meeting
took place with extraterrestrails known as MIBs, or
"Men In Black."    HEY, Don't take my word for it,
read Vance Davis's book called "Unbroken Promises-
At True Story of Courage and Belief" by Vance Davis and
Brian Blashaw.  ISBN # 1-887266-00-3
It can be ordered from:
White Mesa Publishers
P.O. Box 5151
Kent, Washington  98064-5115

206-630-2165

Good luck and happy debunking!
----------------
Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression
by David Martin

Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring
down
a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based
defense,
other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques
depends
heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token
opposition
party.

1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.

2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.

3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors."
If,
     in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn
about
     the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."

4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the
weakest
     charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild
rumors
     and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the
charges, real
     and fanciful alike.

5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut,"
"ranter,"
     "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then
     carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you
have
     thus maligned.

6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting
     strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are
     simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make
money.

7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition
can
     be very useful.

8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."

9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance"
or
     "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the
     impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to
relatively
     harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often
requires
     the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one
     originally taken.

10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as
     ultimately unknowable.

11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With
     thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is
irrelevant. For
     example: We have a completely free press. If they know of
evidence that
     the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior
knowledge
     of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They
haven't
     reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another
     variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy
leaker
     and a press that would report it.

12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. For example:
If
     Vince Foster was murdered, who did it and why?

13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or
reporting a
     distraction.

http://www.Public-Action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum
or http://206.55.8.10/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum
SkyWriter@Public-Action.com
Postal Address: Carol A. Valentine, Public Action, Inc., PO Box 10933,
Burke, VA 22009

The current debunkers sock-puppets include VD-VAC; H�gart, The TRAITOR
and Debunker-Sympathizer Whorey.