WHAT CHANGE? By Chuck Baldwin

WHAT CHANGE? By Chuck Baldwin
�Change you can believe in.� This was Barack Obama�s campaign slogan.
There is no doubt that the American people were fed up with George W.
Bush and his fellow Republicans. Who can blame them?
After campaigning for change back in 1999 (What political challenger
doesn�t campaign for change?), President Bush and his fellow neocons
promptly set out to continue business as usual in Washington, D.C.
Federal spending and meddling exploded under the leadership of the
GOP. In fact, one has to go back to the administrations of Franklin D.
Roosevelt to match the increases in Big Government and Big Brother by
Bush and Company. Add to the out-of-control spending habits of the GOP
an unnecessary war, a near-Depression economy, and a burgeoning police
state. It is no surprise that the American people were ready for
change. And Obama excelled in delivering the message of change. So,
what kind of change will Obama actually deliver?
Will Obama remove U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan? Probably not.
Oh, he might reduce troops in Iraq, but if anyone believes that he
will not leave a significant U.S. presence in Iraq, they are living in
a dream world. Furthermore, many, if not most, of the troops from Iraq
will most likely find themselves in Afghanistan. Mark my words; Barack
Obama has no plans to remove U.S. troops from the Middle East. Net
result: no change.
What about America�s economic woes? What changes will Barack Obama
bring to the table? Hardly any. America will continue it�s trademark
deficit spending; we will continue to send manufacturing jobs
overseas; so-called �free trade� deals will continue to advance; Big
Business will continue to receive government bailouts; the Federal
Reserve will continue to call the shots for America�s financial
decisions (and reap gargantuan profits in the process); Congress will
continue to be inept, irresponsible, and clueless; there will be no
attempt to return the United States to sound money principles; and
there will be no reduction in foreign aid. In a nutshell, it will be
business as usual in Washington, D.C., and New York City.
Don�t get me wrong: Barack Obama will doubtless throw out some bones
to his liberal supporters in much the same way that Republican
presidents throw out a bone or two to their conservative constituents.
Watch for Obama to overturn the ban on embryonic stem cell research.
America�s upper income earners can expect some sort of tax increase.
No doubt oil companies will end up losing some tax exemptions. Watch
for additional environmentalist policies to be enacted. And, yes,
there will be some sort of �universal health care� proposal. But the
Bush administration has already given America a socialized financial
system, so how can Republicans complain about socialized medicine?
Obama might try to resurrect the �Fairness Doctrine.� Some suggest
that Obama might try to rid the prohibition of homosexuals serving in
the armed forces, but I doubt that he will take on this one. The
political net gain would not be worth the potential fallout.
Although he might want to, I doubt that Obama will actively promote
additional gun control (Democrats always lose when this happens). He
may push for a ban on �high capacity� magazines that hold over ten
rounds, as Bill Clinton did. If Obama does not go after guns directly,
we can expect some sort of attack on ammunition (which is already
happening) that will drive up the cost of ammo even more. Of course,
some sort of gun confiscation or martial law could materialize in the
wake of another �terrorist� attack. But a McCain administration would
act no differently, so, again, the net result is zero change.
Remember, it was Republican George W. Bush who expunged Posse
Comitatus and deployed 20,000 army troops on U.S. soil to be used for
domestic law enforcement. If Obama really wanted to bring about
change, he would reverse Bush�s draconian decisions, would he not?
Don�t hold your breath.
We can also expect more harassment of gun owners and lawful gun
dealers by the BATFE. But this is no change at all. The current
leadership at BATFE is already about as hostile to gun owners and gun
dealers as it can possibly be. An Obama BATFE will be no worse. But
neither will it be any better. Net result: no change.
So, what will be the overall change to the direction of America?
Answer: there will be no change to the overall direction of the
country. There will be no change to the welfare state. There will be
little change to the warfare state. No change to NATO, except to
expand it. Very little change, if any, to foreign policy. No change to
America�s open sieves, otherwise called national borders. And there
will be absolutely no change to the burgeoning New World Order that
began in earnest under both Bushes and Bill Clinton.
The NAFTA superhighway will have the support of the Obama
administration. The North American Community will proceed unimpeded by
the Obama White House. In all likelihood, the Amero (a common currency
with Canada and Mexico) will materialize during Obama�s first term.
But this would all have happened had John McCain been elected. No
change here.
One reason why it is so easy to predict a business-as-usual Obama
Presidency is the people that Obama has surrounded himself with.
Former New York Federal Reserve chairman Timothy Geithner* for
Secretary of the Treasury; former Secretary of the Treasury Lawrence
Summers* for National Economic Council director; Bush�s Defense
Secretary Robert Gates* will keep his job; Illinois Representative
Rahm Emanuel for Obama�s Chief of Staff; Hillary Clinton for Secretary
of State; Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano* for Secretary of Homeland
Security; former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle* to head the Health
and Human Services Department; former Assistant Attorney General Eric
Holder to be Attorney General; New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson* as
Secretary of Commerce; Susan Rice* for U.S. Ambassador to the United
Nations; Paul Volcker* for the Economic Recovery Advisory Board; James
Steinberg* as Deputy Secretary of State; Mona Sutphen* for Deputy
White House Chief of Staff, and Louis Caldera* for Director of the
White House Military Office.
Does anyone see �change� with the above names? Every one of them is a
longtime political insider. And at least eleven of them (those with an
asterisk [*] behind their names, above) are members of the globalist
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In fact, six out of the eleven
cabinet-level positions in the Obama administration are CFR members.
The CFR has dominated both Democrat and Republican Presidential
administrations for decades. Presidents such as Dwight Eisenhower,
Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush and Bill
Clinton have all been members of the CFR. Vice Presidents such as
Hubert Humphrey, Nelson Rockefeller, Walter Mondale, and Dick Cheney
have been CFR members. And over the last several decades, practically
every secretary of defense, secretary of the treasury, and most CIA
directors have been CFR members. And let�s not forget that this year�s
Republican Presidential nominee, John McCain, is a CFR member.
Do you now see why�no matter who is elected President of the United
States�nothing changes? Republican or Democrat, it does not matter:
the CFR and their collaborators remain in power. And as Sonny and Cher
used to sing, �The Beat Goes On.�
There will be no real change in Washington, D.C., until the CFR and
their elitist cronies are thoroughly and universally removed from
power. And the only way this will happen is if we elect an Independent
President of the United States (someone who truly understands the New
World Order and is dedicated to defeating it), because the two major
parties will never allow someone opposed to the CFR to become their
nominee. The only Republican candidate for President in 2008 who
demonstrated those credentials was Dr. Ron Paul. And to a lesser
degree, the only Democrat who even seemed to vaguely understand this
was Dennis Kucinich. Notice that both men were thoroughly repudiated
by their respective parties� leadership and all but totally ignored by
the national news media. (The CFR and their surrogates also control
the national news media. What a coincidence!)
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin477.htm