| Subject: Re: Witnesses Assert They Saw Aliens at U.S. Bases//Working Relations With ETs Now Decades Old! |
| From: "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> |
| Date: 10/07/2012, 04:46 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy |
On Jul 9, 9:17 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 02:26:23 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by "Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com>:
On Jul 8, 10:07 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:39:49 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by "Sir Arthur C.B.E.
Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com>:
(Supposed) Witnesses Assert...three unnamed witnesses...<yadda, yadda>
Pretty much sums it up...
How about three NAMED debunkers: Casanobrain; The Traitor and VD-VAC.
You think those are names? Interesting...and it explains a
lot.
But it hardly provides names for your claimed "witnesses",
now does it? Nice attempt to tapdance, though.
Okay, are YOU happy now??
Sure, jerking your chain and watching you respond with your
usual (and B-O-O-O-RING) boilerplate irrelevancies always
gives me a laugh. Why?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
The evidence is ABOVE reproach, especially to the nut-cases known as
debunkers. The debunkers credibility is about the same as any sterno-
bum, which not so coincidentally are over half of all debunkers!!! Go
figure!!
Sir A