OK...So tell me. How do I go about using the command line version, and what
are the implications? Is it a hassle to go to Seti and back to a program?
Does seti still run continuously? Anything I should know about the basic
differences from a user standpoint?
"Bl�wphish" <Blowphish@nym/dot/alias/dot/net> wrote in message
news:3ee0d414.247052656@localhost...

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:59:33 +0800, <soon93@time.net.my> wrote:

I'd recommend getting SETI Driver and using the command line exe....

I have several computers running SETI, but my 2.5GHz averages 2hr -
56min. / unit.


Cheers,
Bl�wphish

"Luriko" <ronwalsh@istar.ca> wrote in message
news:5497dvsk5c9vfjdvm8ur16mfed6ltjfig3@4ax.com...

Just a quick question.
Just picked up a new computer
Pentium 4, 2.66ghz, Windows xp.
When I run WUs, it takes on the average
of 21 to 24 hrs to complete.This seem a bit slow to me.
Although,  the other machine is 200 mhz, Windows 95 and it
can take 60+hrs to complete a unit.
So, is  the pentium 4 in the ball park with
regards to process time ?

Thx................

My is Pentium4 2.4ghz with DDR333
It takes average 4hrs10min to finish one unit.
I am using windows version without showing the graphics
(run in background)