Subject: Re: 3 Human Years, 1 CPU year & 1000 WU's
From: gheston@hiwaay.net (Gary Heston)
Date: 27/07/2003, 15:32
Newsgroups: alt.sci.seti

In article <RHLUa.2800$G85.1916@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>,
Roger Gelder <roger.gelder@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Me too. It's like comparing elephants and a mule.
Both do the hauling, one is a big big for fitting to
the wagon, (Ok, OK, sheer envy of a big cartel) :)
  [ ... ]

"Jack Hinton" <probe1a1@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:e6CUa.4734$Az7.4318@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
: I've been crunching for 3 years now.  Thanx for all the help posted
: here, wouldn't be here without it.
  [ ... ]
: I wish they busted up the statistics so that SINGLE COMPUTER users not
: SINGLE ACCOUNT users, could kick it up.
  [ ... ]

Trying to track anything like that would be extremely difficult; it'd
require a much larger database and raise other issues--how to verify
that it's one system, making certain it's not a system running a queue
fed by other systems, what to do when the user gets a new system (make
them get another account, or block the old system), etc.

Some of the systems I've used to crunch units don't exist any more; most
were cheap used systems that have had motherboard swaps, and some haven't
been brought into service yet.

However, whether you're running one system or 26, at 95% or 99.967%, have
1000 completed units or 37,196, all of it contributes to science.


Gary
United Devices can rot.

-- Gary Heston gheston@hiwaay.net PHB: "That's the sort of leadership that will turn this company around." Wally: "Were we doing well?" Dilbert, 5/23/3