| Subject: Re: Manual Virtual mem improved WU speed. |
| From: "Michael D. Ober" <obermd.@.alum.mit.edu.nospam> |
| Date: 06/08/2003, 05:04 |
You are correct that you can set the swap file size on NT and it's
derivatives. However, you won't get the tremendous performance increase,
nor can you control the amount of memory used for disk caching.
Mike.
"~misfit~" <misfit@'SPAMTRAP'orcon.net.nz> wrote in message
news:vYXXa.107004$JA5.2362260@news.xtra.co.nz...
"Michael D. Ober" <obermd.@.alum.mit.edu.nospam> wrote in message
news:9haXa.32126$Mc.2555337@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
It has to be Win95, 98, or ME, since NT and it's descendents don't have
this
control.
Huh? I am running XP Pro and have set my swapfile/pagefile manually to
512MB
max/min. I was unaware that I couldn't do that.
--
~misfit~
"ytrewq" <ytrewq@poiu.com> wrote in message
news:kR8Xa.9514$gi.4711178@news2.news.adelphia.net...
What OS? - W95/8/2k/XP?
What SETI software? Screensavewr or CLI?
===========
"Chuck in Minot" <no0z@earthmail.com> wrote in message
news:viip7nlqorho5f@corp.supernews.com...
I went and set my vitural mem from letting Windows manage it, to
"Let
me
specify my own" and set it 10 times my 128megs of ram as I read on
the
Setispy site, and now on a 400Mhz Celeron WUs that were taking right
around
20hrs to process now take around 14-15...I also since I don't use my
CR-ROM,
went and reduced its cache to save some more resources.
Well now I have been getting a 4-5 hr gain of speed, which is quite
impressive. My machine also boots up a whole lot faster.
Just passing this on if others would like to see if they can gain a
little
time.
KeEp CrUnChiNG!!
==========================
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.507 / Virus Database: 304 - Release Date: 4/08/2003