Roger Halstead <newsgroups@rogerhalstead.com> wrote:

With the first release of Windows NT 4.0, it appears. Haven't seen
any word that 3.51 was vulnerable (MS didn't have a patch for it, in
any case).

Hard to tell as MS no longer supports 3.**

Same goes for 9x, they didn't test it, according to their security
bulletin.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp

I'm sure that if 9x was vulnerable, someone would've reported getting
infected, but I don't find it reassuring to know that they didn't even
bother to check on 95/98 as I'm sure there are still a lot more win 98's
out there than win 3.51's

Sharku

-- 
Customer: "What does UART stand for anyway??"
Tech Support: "It stands for UART gettin' online"