| Subject: Re: Low Angle Range ... |
| From: "m" <no_nomine@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 10/09/2003, 14:36 |
of the last 51 units processed and returned, 9 were of AR <= 0.1 and 4 of
these were <=0.01, plus 6 others in the 'normal' range took 25-30% longer
than normal to process.
"Nixo Villie" <nixo_villie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:j527b.67$NW3.54@news1.central.cox.net...
"m" <no_nomine@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WS17b.13445$Ci1.1951117@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net...
: out of interest - what is the upper limit of AR to qualify a unit as
VLAR.
: If it's 0.5 then I agree I'm getting more of those than any with a
larger
: value of the AR. I actually set SetiCache to look for sweet units.
(I read a
: thread about this, so I wondered what it did) - the proportion has,
if
: anything increased (probably coincidental timing).
I don't know about SetiCache, but when you tell SetiQue to look for
sweet WUs, it simply monitors the Angle Range of the WU it just
downloaded. If the WU qualifies as sweet, it then over-rides any
settings for the queue and fetches another WU in the hopes that the
sweet units are clustered. SQ will download sweet units in this
fashion until the queue is 50% over its maximum "length". When this
limit is reached or a non-sweet WU is downloaded, SetiQue reverts back
to its standard queue settings. At no time is a WU discarded.
Nixo